New-generation software technologies impact operational stability, safety

Operational stability, safety, and security remain critical requirements in industrial applications.


Regardless of the changes in industrial applications, one fact holds: operational stability, safety, and security remain critical requirements. A variety of new technologies are helping ensure and promote these features. In field instrumentation, for example, safety and security are not guaranteed just by internal procedures or the manufacturer’s warranty, but by a system architecture that uses voltages and currents that are intrinsically safe in the environment in which the instrumentation will operate. 

An analogous concept applies with software. The previous generation used C/C++, pointers, multiple modules sharing the same memory area, and direct access to hardware and operating system resources that were considered intrinsically unsafe. New generation software, on the other hand, uses computational environments—such as the .Net framework. Here, processes are natively isolated from the operating system, allowing better use of multiple processor cores and greater operational stability, even in the face of driver and hardware errors or individual system module failures. 

Similarly with user scripting in an application, previous generation software used proprietary scripts or interpreted languages such as VBScript, VBA, or proprietary expressions editors. Today, new generation software relies on modern, compiled languages such as C# or VB.Net with object-orientation and execution control. Legacy interpreted languages do not permit a complete code validation during the development stages, allowing it only when the final verification is made. As a result, it may be possible to test problems or concerns only when the project is running, not earlier during engineering configuration. 

In a typical project, code may have hundreds to thousands of possible execution paths. Scenarios cannot test all those paths and all possible cases. The ability to detect potential errors during engineering configuration, and the ability to recover and isolate the errors during runtime, are key elements for safety and operational stability. They are possible only by fully migrating legacy interpreted scripts to new compiled and managed languages.

The table below lists some typical real-time, industrial automation systems features and components, and how legacy and new-generation software technologies affect them.


Feature or component


New-generation technologies


Legacy technologies


Internal programming



Automatic, protected memory management; independent of hardware and operating system protection.



Extensive use of pointers; required validation for each device; direct access to hardware and operating system.


Graphics programming


WPF, XBAP, Silverlight, XAML

Uses hardware acceleration regardless of resolution (vector); greater performance, native capacity for 3D, multi-touch.



Pixel-oriented; dependent on monitor resolution, distorts in conversion, limitations of dynamic animations and use of graphical card.


Editing and project execution


Multi-user, remote editing, and execution of multiple projects.


Single-user and mono project. Remote access requires external tool.


Remote access to runtime


Smart-client technology with centralized installation on a server or Web, or in Cloud, without installation of additional components. Standardized, secure protocols such as WCF.


Local installation required for clients and Web clients. Dedicated protocols with frequent need to open firewall ports. Custom protocols and need for often unsafe Active-X components.


Traceability of version control and configuration


Client-server architecture, SQL, databases centered with native traceability of project versions and settings.


Configuration split in multiple files with no built-in ties. Traceability performed manually or through external programs.


Functional modules and scripts at runtime


Native multiple processes and threads; each module and script execution thread .Net natively protected from others. Architecture designed for effective use of multi-core processors. Exception control and memory protection by the operating environment.


Single process multi-threaded or manually programmed logical and sequential execution of unified environment. Insulation of modules, parallel execution of scripts and protection exceptions, when they existed, were done through dedicated programming with higher level of complexity.




Compiled (Vb.Net/C#)

Implementation of logic is 10 to 40 times faster than an interpreted script or owner. Performs more checks during configuration, is multi-threaded and handles exceptions, ensuring isolation of errors and increased performance. Full access to all functions in .NET framework.


Interpreted (VBA/VBScript or logical and mathematical proprietary).

Detection of many errors possible only when the system is run. Most were mono-thread with slower functions, possible compromise of system errors, and sometimes limited access to Windows functions.


Native platforms


64-bit native; support for 32-bit. Better use of hardware; more compatibility. System originally designed for 64-bit to use components already present in the operating system.


32-bit native; support for 64-bit. When and where possible, support for 64-bit required the installation of many additional components not native to the operating system.


Communication drivers


Parallel execution with a capacity for multiple connections to each node. Automatic statistics, diagnostics, redundancy, syntax validation on the addresses field, and exception recovery are standard.


No parallel requests or multi-threading. Statistics, diagnostics, redundancy partially available. Typically a driver exception halts the driver execution, sometimes the whole system.


No comments
The Top Plant program honors outstanding manufacturing facilities in North America. View the 2013 Top Plant.
The Product of the Year program recognizes products newly released in the manufacturing industries.
The Engineering Leaders Under 40 program identifies and gives recognition to young engineers who...
A cool solution: Collaboration, chemistry leads to foundry coat product development; See the 2015 Product of the Year Finalists
Raising the standard: What's new with NFPA 70E; A global view of manufacturing; Maintenance data; Fit bearings properly
Sister act: Building on their father's legacy, a new generation moves Bales Metal Surface Solutions forward; Meet the 2015 Engineering Leaders Under 40
Cyber security cost-efficient for industrial control systems; Extracting full value from operational data; Managing cyber security risks
Drilling for Big Data: Managing the flow of information; Big data drilldown series: Challenge and opportunity; OT to IT: Creating a circle of improvement; Industry loses best workers, again
Pipeline vulnerabilities? Securing hydrocarbon transit; Predictive analytics hit the mainstream; Dirty pipelines decrease flow, production—pig your line; Ensuring pipeline physical and cyber security
Upgrading secondary control systems; Keeping enclosures conditioned; Diagnostics increase equipment uptime; Mechatronics simplifies machine design
Designing positive-energy buildings; Ensuring power quality; Complying with NFPA 110; Minimizing arc flash hazards
Building high availability into industrial computers; Of key metrics and myth busting; The truth about five common VFD myths

Annual Salary Survey

After almost a decade of uncertainty, the confidence of plant floor managers is soaring. Even with a number of challenges and while implementing new technologies, there is a renewed sense of optimism among plant managers about their business and their future.

The respondents to the 2014 Plant Engineering Salary Survey come from throughout the U.S. and serve a variety of industries, but they are uniform in their optimism about manufacturing. This year’s survey found 79% consider manufacturing a secure career. That’s up from 75% in 2013 and significantly higher than the 63% figure when Plant Engineering first started asking that question a decade ago.

Read more: 2014 Salary Survey: Confidence rises amid the challenges

Maintenance and reliability tips and best practices from the maintenance and reliability coaches at Allied Reliability Group.
The One Voice for Manufacturing blog reports on federal public policy issues impacting the manufacturing sector. One Voice is a joint effort by the National Tooling and Machining...
The Society for Maintenance and Reliability Professionals an organization devoted...
Join this ongoing discussion of machine guarding topics, including solutions assessments, regulatory compliance, gap analysis...
IMS Research, recently acquired by IHS Inc., is a leading independent supplier of market research and consultancy to the global electronics industry.
Maintenance is not optional in manufacturing. It’s a profit center, driving productivity and uptime while reducing overall repair costs.
The Lachance on CMMS blog is about current maintenance topics. Blogger Paul Lachance is president and chief technology officer for Smartware Group.