MES vs. ERP: Do you need one system or two?

With today’s competitive manufacturing environment, companies will certainly be looking at which technology can help them deliver more quickly, cheaply and efficiently to meet their customer’s demands—the question is: can this be achieved through an ERP system or does it require specialist functionality that only MES provides?

08/04/2008




Rita Flakoll, Syscom, PLC

Linking shop-floor to top-floor is increasingly being recognized as crucial to securing success in the manufacturing industry. The best way to manage factory floor production and achieve the information flow desired, however, is a hotly debated matter. Vendors of specialist Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES) often claim that Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) software is geared towards office-based tasks, such as accounting and order entry, and as such is of little value to the manufacturing department. ERP advocates, on the other hand, will often point out that the main reason for this argument is historic; ERP software has evolved, with today’s solutions offering the functionality manufacturers need alongside the integration crucial for a unified, plant-wide view of production and effective utilization of shop-floor data.
With today’s competitive manufacturing environment, companies will certainly be looking at which technology can help them deliver more quickly, cheaply and efficiently to meet their customer’s demands—the question is: can this be achieved through an ERP system or does it require specialist functionality that only MES provides?
Defining MES
Also known as Shop Floor Control Systems or Plant-Side IT Solutions, MES are defined by the MESA International as dynamic information systems that drive effective execution of manufacturing operations.
For many manufacturers MES remains a confusing acronym. Although all systems are used to manage and monitor work-in-progress on the factory floor, the software varies significantly for each vertical industry and product line. Some systems, for example, provide Statistical Process Control, which allows for collection of in-process data, while others offer visual representations of projected workloads. In general, MES systems will allow users to specify when materials should be ordered, to schedule tasks against an organization’s total production capacity through advanced production scheduling (APS), which allows for visual representations of projected workloads, and offer some form of Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) reporting to gauge real-time efficiency. MES can also guide workers or machines through the production process. Specialist functionality for particular process industries can include modules such as ingredient expiration date monitoring and emergency shutdown systems.
What to expect from MES
In summary, MES software aims to provide operator support, production scheduling, genealogy tracking capabilities and accurate, real-time visibility into production performance. As a result such software could deliver the following benefits to an organization:
• Reduction of errors (and thus a reduction of waste and rework);
• Easier location of the causes of problems;
• Reduction of manual entry time;
• Reduced cycle-time (and thus increased yield and throughput);
• Efficient use of equipment;
• Improved planning and streamlined schedules (enabling a better handling of rush orders and improving on-time delivery percentages);
• Reduced order-to-ship times; and
• Reduced cost of regulatory compliance.
MES software centers wholly on the manufacturing aspect of a business, and as a result its functionality does not naturally extend to cover areas such as finance or customer relationship management. An MES system will, for example, tell you when an item is ready to be shipped but would not automatically handle any invoicing or update a customer’s record. In order to link plant floor events in real-time with business events, ERP or other similar software might be a better option.
Can an ERP application offer the same, if not greater, benefits within a modern manufacturing organization?
Defining ERP
ERP software comprises a suite of modules which together automate the business administration functions of an enterprise. ERP is generally defined as integrated, multi-module application software packages designed to serve and support several business functions across an organization.
Although today ERP is considered a desirable tool for most organizations, it has been traditionally associated mainly with discrete manufacturing companies, having originated as an extension of Materials Requirements Planning (MRP). Today, the majority of ERP systems span all the functions of an enterprise. Modules usually include financials, order processing, manufacturing, supply chain and inventory management, human resources and customer relationship management.
A truly integrated ERP system is designed to use one unified database, which enhances communication between all functions and modules. This means that, unlike traditional MES software, ERP provides enterprise-wide collaboration and real-time reporting capabilities.
As with MES software, there is a wide variety of ERP solutions on the market.
The problem in the past with ERP systems was that, despite having their roots in MRP, they provided limited functionality for the manufacturing department. “Of course today ERP systems are a far cry from what they used to be,” says Sally Reynolds, Marketing Manager Syscom PLC . “Now the manufacturing modules in many ERP systems are extremely advanced, offering functionally like job costing, tool tracking and capacity planning. Unfortunately the misconception that modern ERP systems do little more than handle orders, stock and financials still lingers, so many manufacturers assume they need additional specialist software when an ERP solution may in fact be the best solution for them.”
What to expect from ERP
By its very definition, ERP can aid management of resources across an entire business, ensuring greater efficiency, improved profitability and competitiveness.
In summary, a good ERP system could:
• Connect manufacturing operations with the entire organization;
• Reduce data input, improving efficiency and reducing manual errors;
• Improve customer service;
• Give an enterprise-wide view and reporting to allow for better, more informed decision making;
• Improve collaboration internally as well with suppliers and customers;
• Increase visibility of business operations and control costs; and
• Provide an effective means of translating strategic business goals to real-time planning and control.
MES vs. ERP
The pharmaceutical, chemical, and food industries have all traditionally been heavy users of MES software. Here the additional, specialist functionality that some MES systems provide is often beneficial—for example, recipe management capabilities, which give machine operating instructions concerning the weight of ingredients and timing of manufacturing events, and statistical process control, which can ensure variables such as temperature do not exceed set parameters, may be essential for a drug manufacturer. Many MES systems also include advanced planning and scheduling (APS) which generates visual schedule boards to represent machine, material, and staff availability as well as queued production runs and their due dates. This means that any planned maintenance, for example, is highlighted in a visual format. MES traceability and genealogy tracking capabilities can also reduce the cost of regulatory compliance by providing manufacturers with a complete manufacturing record containing all the information needed to demonstrate that a process was completely successful. This concern, however, is almost exclusively limited to food, pharmaceutical, and medical device manufacturers.
MES systems have not caught on in the same way in non-process industries. For businesses involved in discrete, make-to-stock or make-to-order manufacturing an ERP application can provide a wealth of functionality to manage these types of operations.
“For the most part discrete manufacturers do not need to be able to collect detailed in-process data,” says Reynolds. “The workflow scheduling, bill of material generation and quality analysis capabilities an ERP system provides are more than sufficient. Manufacturers in these industries need to consider whether the additional functionality of an MES system may prove to be overkill in certain situations.”
Moreover, organizations today recognize that company-wide integration is crucial for increasing efficiency and gaining the business insights necessary to secure a competitive advantage and maximize profitability. “Software applications that only manage one aspect of a business provide islands of information which can lead to the compartmentalization of an organization,” Reynolds adds. “Businesses with such systems often lack the information flow they expected to achieve. ERP of course gives this enterprise-wide view. Arguably, the largest benefits of MES come from using the factory floor visibility gained to improve overarching supply chain management and business strategies, so companies who do feel they need an MES system may choose to run this alongside an ERP system to gain a more comprehensive view of production.”
Choose the best system for your business
There is no standard tick-list for deciding whether your business needs MES software, an ERP system or both. The key to a successful software implementation is making sure you define your requirements and what is important to your business before selecting which software would best meet your business objectives. “Check out the jargon,” Reynolds advises. “The additional acronyms in the list of available functionality may sound impressive but you may not actually need it.”

Rita Flakoll is a marketing and research assistant, with Syscom PLC, a UK-based firm dedicated to providing business wide integrated software applications to small and mid size companies.





No comments
The Top Plant program honors outstanding manufacturing facilities in North America. View the 2013 Top Plant.
The Product of the Year program recognizes products newly released in the manufacturing industries.
The Engineering Leaders Under 40 program identifies and gives recognition to young engineers who...
The true cost of lubrication: Three keys to consider when evaluating oils; Plant Engineering Lubrication Guide; 11 ways to protect bearing assets; Is lubrication part of your KPIs?
Contract maintenance: 5 ways to keep things humming while keeping an eye on costs; Pneumatic systems; Energy monitoring; The sixth 'S' is safety
Transport your data: Supply chain information critical to operational excellence; High-voltage faults; Portable cooling; Safety automation isn't automatic
Case Study Database

Case Study Database

Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Plant Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.

These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.

Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.

Maintaining low data center PUE; Using eco mode in UPS systems; Commissioning electrical and power systems; Exploring dc power distribution alternatives
Synchronizing industrial Ethernet networks; Selecting protocol conversion gateways; Integrating HMIs with PLCs and PACs
Why manufacturers need to see energy in a different light: Current approaches to energy management yield quick savings, but leave plant managers searching for ways of improving on those early gains.

Annual Salary Survey

Participate in the 2013 Salary Survey

In a year when manufacturing continued to lead the economic rebound, it makes sense that plant manager bonuses rebounded. Plant Engineering’s annual Salary Survey shows both wages and bonuses rose in 2012 after a retreat the year before.

Average salary across all job titles for plant floor management rose 3.5% to $95,446, and bonus compensation jumped to $15,162, a 4.2% increase from the 2010 level and double the 2011 total, which showed a sharp drop in bonus.

2012 Salary Survey Analysis

2012 Salary Survey Results

Maintenance and reliability tips and best practices from the maintenance and reliability coaches at Allied Reliability Group.
The One Voice for Manufacturing blog reports on federal public policy issues impacting the manufacturing sector. One Voice is a joint effort by the National Tooling and Machining...
The Society for Maintenance and Reliability Professionals an organization devoted...
Join this ongoing discussion of machine guarding topics, including solutions assessments, regulatory compliance, gap analysis...
IMS Research, recently acquired by IHS Inc., is a leading independent supplier of market research and consultancy to the global electronics industry.
Maintenance is not optional in manufacturing. It’s a profit center, driving productivity and uptime while reducing overall repair costs.
The Lachance on CMMS blog is about current maintenance topics. Blogger Paul Lachance is president and chief technology officer for Smartware Group.