Machine vision improves safety, productivity for food and beverage manufacturers
Move to 360-deg inspection
Tabasco brand products have been made by McIlhenny Company on Avery Island, La., since 1868. McIlhenny Company has four different bottling lines that are used for bottles ranging in size from 2 ounces to 12 ounces. The lines operate at around 300 bottles per minute. The company is extremely quality-minded about everything from aging its product for up to three years to making sure every label is correct, straight, and in the right position on the bottle.
Each bottle of Tabasco sauce has a diamond label on the front, a rectangular label on its back, a wrap on its top neck, a cap, and a fitment underneath the cap to control flow out of the bottle.
“We use hundreds of different labels, and it’s critical to ensure that the correct label is affixed to every bottle,” said Tom Grimsley, Jr., bottling manager for McIlhenny Company. “For example, if we produce an order intended for Germany with Austrian labels, we will not only have an unhappy customer but also considerable expenses to remake and reship the product. Since we produce a premium product, we also want to be sure that every label is straight and in the correct position.”
“In the past we used infrared light and photoeyes to inspect labels,” Grimsley said. “The previous method was capable of determining whether the label was in the correct position but could not determine if the label itself was correct. We are very quality-minded, so we decided that we needed to find something better.
“About two years ago I went to a packaging trade show with our purchasing manager, night shift manager, and maintenance manager to look at the latest vision inspection systems for bottling lines. We concluded that Acquire Automation had the best performing solution for 360-deg inspection. Their product uses Cognex OmniView to produce a complete image of the circumference of the bottle. Their system offers an operator friendly human/machine interface and can easily be programmed for new labels and bottle sizes. We also liked the fact that their system measures 30 in. by 30 in. so it easily fits within the footprint vacated by our previous inspection system.”
Complete 360-deg inspection of unoriented bottles, tubes, and cylindrical containers has traditionally required line scan vision technology combined with complex mechanical handling devices for image acquisition. Acquire Automation’s approach enables less intrusive integration options and higher throughput rates. Units can be in any orientation as they pass through the vision inspection system. The system selected by McIlhenny Company uses four cameras to obtain a 360-deg view of all features of the bottles. The vision software technology uses images from multiple area-scan cameras positioned around the cylindrical object to instantly generate a virtual 3D surface model. It then creates a seamless, undistorted, unwrapped image of the complete surface to which optical character recognition (OCR), barcode reading, and other machine vision software tools can be applied. “This inspection system provides confidence in the quality and conformance of every product we ship,” said Grimsley.
Grimsley said the inspection system has already paid for itself, primarily by ensuring that only conforming products are shipped to customers. He also said that the overall quality of the product has been improved. “If something goes wrong with the equipment that is causing skewed labels, we can identify the problem on the very first label,” Grimsley said. “Overall, we are more comfortable with our quality and feel confident that every product we ship conforms to our standards.”
Saving $250,000 per year with machine vision
A snack food manufacturer with multiple brands packages its individual serving products in boxes that are 3-ft wide by 2-ft by 1.5-ft tall. The boxes travel down a conveyor line to a diverter chute where they are sorted for shipping. Barcodes on the boxes, which are placed at varying locations and orientations, are read during a brief pause of the conveyor right before the diverter chute. The company chose its previous laser-based barcode scanner after seeing a demonstration, but found out after installation that the laser solution would not work because of perspective distortion and the relative size of code vs. distance. The laser scanner was positioned 36 in. away, mounted at a height of 36 in. and aimed downward at an approximate 45-deg angle to the inspection surface. Because of the distortion caused by the mounting angle, as well as the distance from the barcode, the laser-based scanner was getting read rates of only 20% to 30%.
The company addressed the problem by stationing an operator at the diverter to manually direct boxes to the correct locations when their barcodes weren’t read. Because the manufacturer runs three shifts per day, the inefficiency of the laser-based scanner cost the company an estimated $100,000 per year for the three full-time positions. This approach sometimes resulted in boxes going to the wrong locations, resulting in orders that were filled incorrectly and returned products that could not be resold. Losses attributed to these mistakes were estimated at $150,000 annually.
Crescent Electric Supply Company, a machine vision distributor and integrator, came up with a better approach. “I knew the minute I looked at their setup that there was no way a laser-based scanner would work,” said Rick Rasbitsky, an application engineer at Crescent Electric. What he proposed instead was to configure the ID reader with a 50 mm lens and mount it exactly where the laser-based scanner had been. He also installed an external blue light (SV75) at a low angle to the box to better illuminate the 12-in. by 12-in. area of inspection and then connected the ID reader.
From the moment the image-based ID reader started operating, it produced a 100% read rate. “The snack food company was surprised and also very pleased,” said Rasbitsky. “The device reads correctly 100% of the time, no matter where the labels are positioned or how they are oriented.” Since replacing the laser-based scanner with the ID reader, the food manufacturer has eliminated the cost of having one employee per shift manually divert boxes. It also avoids shipping products to the wrong locations, eliminating the losses previously caused by returned products. Management is so pleased with the ID reader, and the $250,000 annual savings it generates, that they are planning to purchase additional devices for other packaging lines.
Allergen management, product quality, assembly verification, packaging inspection, and full traceability are critical issues facing the food and beverage industry. Machine vision technology can help food and beverage industry companies improve their manufacturing quality and performance by preventing defects, verifying assembly and tracking, and capturing information at every stage of the production process. Smarter automation using vision systems and ID readers can help generate lower manufacturing costs and higher customer satisfaction.
- The basic idea behind image-based technology is that the reader captures an image and uses a series of algorithms to process the image to make it easier to read.
- Units can be in any orientation as they pass through the vision inspection system. One system uses four cameras to obtain a 360-degree view of all features of the bottles.
- Since replacing the laser-based scanner with the ID reader, a food manufacturer has eliminated manually diverting boxes and shipping products to the wrong locations.
Annual Salary Survey
After almost a decade of uncertainty, the confidence of plant floor managers is soaring. Even with a number of challenges and while implementing new technologies, there is a renewed sense of optimism among plant managers about their business and their future.
The respondents to the 2014 Plant Engineering Salary Survey come from throughout the U.S. and serve a variety of industries, but they are uniform in their optimism about manufacturing. This year’s survey found 79% consider manufacturing a secure career. That’s up from 75% in 2013 and significantly higher than the 63% figure when Plant Engineering first started asking that question a decade ago.