Machine Safety: Does adding a hard guard always make your machine safer?

Machine guarding is sometimes approached with the methodology that says lets first add a hard guard to protect the operator from the hazard. Does this always mitigate the hazard, reduce the hazard to an acceptable level, or achieve “safe enough”?

12/29/2011


Machine guarding is sometimes approached with the methodology that says lets first add a hard guard to protect the operator from the hazard. Does this always mitigate the hazard, reduce the hazard to an acceptable level, or achieve “safe enough”?

   In my opinion this approach only works some of the time. More often, it not only doesn’t solve the problem but it also adds another hazard.

   The required practice today begins with a risk assessment per the local jurisdiction or safety standard governing your application or machine. Having said that, adding the hard guard may have been an appropriate next step, however, it’s only the next step. The safety standard will also say that having added the hard guard you will need to update your risk assessment. One of the driving reasons for this step is to hopefully identify any new hazards created by the addition of the hard guard. Reference; Annex G, Risk Scoring Matrix System, ANSI B11, 2008, below.

Control Engineering Machine Safety blogger J.B. Titus says: Identify any new hazards created by the addition of a hard guard. Reference; Annex G, Risk Scoring Matrix System, ANSI B11, 2008.

   For example, I’ve seen machines that occasionally require an operator to almost work “in” the machine to clear a temporary jam which would otherwise result in lost production or extensive downtime. To reduce the “very likely to occur” hazard of the operator getting caught by the machine and the resulting “catastrophic” potential injury, a hard guard has been added to the machine. But, all too often I’ve seen where this guard has created another hazard if this guard has to automatically open and close to eject a completed product. The updated risk assessment requirement should document this new hazard and mitigation steps should follow. The new guard may protect the operator while the guard is in the closed position, however, what could happen if the operator gets caught by the machine while the guard is open. It seems to me that the operator is still exposed to the catastrophic hazard of the machine and the new hazard of the guard closing. The operator is certainly better protected by the closed guard but potentially in greater harm’s way because of the new hazard.

                                   So, is the machine safer?

   This example suggests the importance of the risk assessment process as a “living” document and the best practice to continually look for machine safety hazards. Adding a hard guard is not always the best answer! And, often it’s recommended to go through this exercise prior to making any changes to the machine because the decision might be made to choose a different machine guarding solution.

   Your comments or suggestion are always welcome so please let us know your thoughts. Submit your ideas, experiences, and challenges on this subject in the comments section below. Click on the following text if you don't see a comments box, then scroll down: Machine Safety: Does adding a hard guard always make your machine safer?

   Related articles:

How To Integrate Safety

Machine Guarding & The Hierarchy of Measures for Hazard Mitigation

Risk assessment - A best practice for sustainable performance

Machine Safety – Hard Guarding Is Best – Right?

Updating Minds About Machine Guarding

 

Contact: www.jbtitus.com for “Solutions for Machine Safety”.



No comments
The Top Plant program honors outstanding manufacturing facilities in North America. View the 2013 Top Plant.
The Product of the Year program recognizes products newly released in the manufacturing industries.
The Engineering Leaders Under 40 program identifies and gives recognition to young engineers who...
The true cost of lubrication: Three keys to consider when evaluating oils; Plant Engineering Lubrication Guide; 11 ways to protect bearing assets; Is lubrication part of your KPIs?
Contract maintenance: 5 ways to keep things humming while keeping an eye on costs; Pneumatic systems; Energy monitoring; The sixth 'S' is safety
Transport your data: Supply chain information critical to operational excellence; High-voltage faults; Portable cooling; Safety automation isn't automatic
Case Study Database

Case Study Database

Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Plant Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.

These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.

Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.

Maintaining low data center PUE; Using eco mode in UPS systems; Commissioning electrical and power systems; Exploring dc power distribution alternatives
Synchronizing industrial Ethernet networks; Selecting protocol conversion gateways; Integrating HMIs with PLCs and PACs
Why manufacturers need to see energy in a different light: Current approaches to energy management yield quick savings, but leave plant managers searching for ways of improving on those early gains.

Annual Salary Survey

Participate in the 2013 Salary Survey

In a year when manufacturing continued to lead the economic rebound, it makes sense that plant manager bonuses rebounded. Plant Engineering’s annual Salary Survey shows both wages and bonuses rose in 2012 after a retreat the year before.

Average salary across all job titles for plant floor management rose 3.5% to $95,446, and bonus compensation jumped to $15,162, a 4.2% increase from the 2010 level and double the 2011 total, which showed a sharp drop in bonus.

2012 Salary Survey Analysis

2012 Salary Survey Results

Maintenance and reliability tips and best practices from the maintenance and reliability coaches at Allied Reliability Group.
The One Voice for Manufacturing blog reports on federal public policy issues impacting the manufacturing sector. One Voice is a joint effort by the National Tooling and Machining...
The Society for Maintenance and Reliability Professionals an organization devoted...
Join this ongoing discussion of machine guarding topics, including solutions assessments, regulatory compliance, gap analysis...
IMS Research, recently acquired by IHS Inc., is a leading independent supplier of market research and consultancy to the global electronics industry.
Maintenance is not optional in manufacturing. It’s a profit center, driving productivity and uptime while reducing overall repair costs.
The Lachance on CMMS blog is about current maintenance topics. Blogger Paul Lachance is president and chief technology officer for Smartware Group.