Machine Safety: Does adding a hard guard always make your machine safer?

Machine guarding is sometimes approached with the methodology that says lets first add a hard guard to protect the operator from the hazard. Does this always mitigate the hazard, reduce the hazard to an acceptable level, or achieve “safe enough”?

12/29/2011


Machine guarding is sometimes approached with the methodology that says lets first add a hard guard to protect the operator from the hazard. Does this always mitigate the hazard, reduce the hazard to an acceptable level, or achieve “safe enough”?

   In my opinion this approach only works some of the time. More often, it not only doesn’t solve the problem but it also adds another hazard.

   The required practice today begins with a risk assessment per the local jurisdiction or safety standard governing your application or machine. Having said that, adding the hard guard may have been an appropriate next step, however, it’s only the next step. The safety standard will also say that having added the hard guard you will need to update your risk assessment. One of the driving reasons for this step is to hopefully identify any new hazards created by the addition of the hard guard. Reference; Annex G, Risk Scoring Matrix System, ANSI B11, 2008, below.

Control Engineering Machine Safety blogger J.B. Titus says: Identify any new hazards created by the addition of a hard guard. Reference; Annex G, Risk Scoring Matrix System, ANSI B11, 2008.

   For example, I’ve seen machines that occasionally require an operator to almost work “in” the machine to clear a temporary jam which would otherwise result in lost production or extensive downtime. To reduce the “very likely to occur” hazard of the operator getting caught by the machine and the resulting “catastrophic” potential injury, a hard guard has been added to the machine. But, all too often I’ve seen where this guard has created another hazard if this guard has to automatically open and close to eject a completed product. The updated risk assessment requirement should document this new hazard and mitigation steps should follow. The new guard may protect the operator while the guard is in the closed position, however, what could happen if the operator gets caught by the machine while the guard is open. It seems to me that the operator is still exposed to the catastrophic hazard of the machine and the new hazard of the guard closing. The operator is certainly better protected by the closed guard but potentially in greater harm’s way because of the new hazard.

                                   So, is the machine safer?

   This example suggests the importance of the risk assessment process as a “living” document and the best practice to continually look for machine safety hazards. Adding a hard guard is not always the best answer! And, often it’s recommended to go through this exercise prior to making any changes to the machine because the decision might be made to choose a different machine guarding solution.

   Your comments or suggestion are always welcome so please let us know your thoughts. Submit your ideas, experiences, and challenges on this subject in the comments section below. Click on the following text if you don't see a comments box, then scroll down: Machine Safety: Does adding a hard guard always make your machine safer?

   Related articles:

How To Integrate Safety

Machine Guarding & The Hierarchy of Measures for Hazard Mitigation

Risk assessment - A best practice for sustainable performance

Machine Safety – Hard Guarding Is Best – Right?

Updating Minds About Machine Guarding

 

Contact: www.jbtitus.com for “Solutions for Machine Safety”.



No comments
The Top Plant program honors outstanding manufacturing facilities in North America. View the 2015 Top Plant.
The Product of the Year program recognizes products newly released in the manufacturing industries.
The Engineering Leaders Under 40 program identifies and gives recognition to young engineers who...
2015 Top Plant: Phoenix Contact, Middletown, Pa.; 2015 Best Practices: Automation, Electrical Safety, Electrical Systems, Pneumatics, Material Handling, Mechanical Systems
A cool solution: Collaboration, chemistry leads to foundry coat product development; See the 2015 Product of the Year Finalists
Raising the standard: What's new with NFPA 70E; A global view of manufacturing; Maintenance data; Fit bearings properly
Special report: U.S. natural gas; LNG transport technologies evolve to meet market demand; Understanding new methane regulations; Predictive maintenance for gas pipeline compressors
Cyber security cost-efficient for industrial control systems; Extracting full value from operational data; Managing cyber security risks
Drilling for Big Data: Managing the flow of information; Big data drilldown series: Challenge and opportunity; OT to IT: Creating a circle of improvement; Industry loses best workers, again
Migrating industrial networks; Tracking HMI advances; Making the right automation changes
Understanding transfer switch operation; Coordinating protective devices; Analyzing NEC 2014 changes; Cooling data centers
Upgrading secondary control systems; Keeping enclosures conditioned; Diagnostics increase equipment uptime; Mechatronics simplifies machine design

Annual Salary Survey

After almost a decade of uncertainty, the confidence of plant floor managers is soaring. Even with a number of challenges and while implementing new technologies, there is a renewed sense of optimism among plant managers about their business and their future.

The respondents to the 2014 Plant Engineering Salary Survey come from throughout the U.S. and serve a variety of industries, but they are uniform in their optimism about manufacturing. This year’s survey found 79% consider manufacturing a secure career. That’s up from 75% in 2013 and significantly higher than the 63% figure when Plant Engineering first started asking that question a decade ago.

Read more: 2014 Salary Survey: Confidence rises amid the challenges

Maintenance and reliability tips and best practices from the maintenance and reliability coaches at Allied Reliability Group.
The One Voice for Manufacturing blog reports on federal public policy issues impacting the manufacturing sector. One Voice is a joint effort by the National Tooling and Machining...
The Society for Maintenance and Reliability Professionals an organization devoted...
Join this ongoing discussion of machine guarding topics, including solutions assessments, regulatory compliance, gap analysis...
IMS Research, recently acquired by IHS Inc., is a leading independent supplier of market research and consultancy to the global electronics industry.
Maintenance is not optional in manufacturing. It’s a profit center, driving productivity and uptime while reducing overall repair costs.
The Lachance on CMMS blog is about current maintenance topics. Blogger Paul Lachance is president and chief technology officer for Smartware Group.
This article collection contains several articles on the vital role that compressed air plays in manufacturing plants.