Machine Safety: Does a risk assessment need to be updated for a minor machine modification?

We’ve made some minor changes to several machines over the past six months but none of these modifications included the safety system. Our engineer said that there was no change in operator safety. Do we have to update the risk assessments anyway? See ANSI B11.0 – 2010 Safety of Machinery – General Requirements and Risk Assessment; OSHA recommended.

05/07/2012


J.B. Titus, CFSE"We’ve made some minor changes to several machines over the past six months but none of these modifications included the safety system. Our engineer said that there was no change in operator safety. Do we have to update the risk assessments anyway?"

   The long and short answer is – yes! This is one of the most frequently asked questions at Machine Safety seminars. Just think about the consequences for a moment. Let’s say a modification was made to the protective fencing moving a man entry gate six feet. The modification was simple enough and the existing door interlock switch continues to work just fine after being re-wired. The operator is unaffected by this change because he/she is not required to access this door. So, operator safety is unaffected as the engineer had said.

   However, if the new door location is now six feet closer to a hazard point the time distance calculations may reflect the need to raise the hazard level from Cat 3 to Cat 4. This will undoubtedly require different hazard mitigation techniques to reach the same reduced level of hazard (acceptable risk). And, how would we discover that this simple modification resulted in a serious change to overall machine safety? An updated risk assessment! This is why any modification to a machine requires that the risk assessment must be updated.

ANSI B11.0 – 2010 Safety of Machinery – General Requirements and Risk Assessment. Cover image used with permission. Courtesy: ANSI   In my opinion, referring to ANSI B11.0 – 2010 Safety of Machinery – General Requirements and Risk Assessment will answer this question in Clause 4.11 (page 27) as follows:

 4.11 Modifying and/or rebuilding a machine

   Non-standard uses or modifications of the machine, machine control system or the safeguarding can create additional hazards. A modifier and/or rebuilder of machinery shall use the risk assessment process to ensure that risks are reduced to an acceptable level. Modifiers and/or rebuilders shall, where practicable, solicit the original supplier’s recommendations regarding any proposed modification to a machine that may affect the safe operation prior to making any such changes.

   Where modifications are made to the machine/system (for example, intended use, tasks, hardware, and software), a risk assessment / risk reduction process shall be repeated for those parts of the machine/system being modified or affected.

   Within the United States I strongly recommend that manufacturers use ANSI B11.0 as one of your core industry standards for machine safety compliance. Also, it’s actually recommended by OSHA.

   Your comments or suggestion are always welcome so please let us know your thoughts. Submit your ideas, experiences, and challenges on this subject in the comments section below. Click on the following text if you don't see a comments box, then scroll down: Machine Safety: Does a risk assessment need to be updated for a minor machine modification?

Related articles:

Updating Minds About Machine Safety

Machine Guarding & The Hierarchy of Measures for Hazard Mitigation

Machine Safety – the myths of safety cultures.

   Contact: www.jbtitus.com for “Solutions for Machine Safety”.



No comments
The Top Plant program honors outstanding manufacturing facilities in North America. View the 2015 Top Plant.
The Product of the Year program recognizes products newly released in the manufacturing industries.
The Engineering Leaders Under 40 program identifies and gives recognition to young engineers who...
World-class manufacturing: A recipe for success: Finding the right mix for a salad dressing line; 2015 Salary Survey: Manufacturing slump dims enthusiasm
2015 Top Plant: Phoenix Contact, Middletown, Pa.; 2015 Best Practices: Automation, Electrical Safety, Electrical Systems, Pneumatics, Material Handling, Mechanical Systems
A cool solution: Collaboration, chemistry leads to foundry coat product development; See the 2015 Product of the Year Finalists
Digital oilfields: Integrated HMI/SCADA systems enable smarter data acquisition; Real-world impact of simulation; Electric actuator technology prospers in production fields
Special report: U.S. natural gas; LNG transport technologies evolve to meet market demand; Understanding new methane regulations; Predictive maintenance for gas pipeline compressors
Cyber security cost-efficient for industrial control systems; Extracting full value from operational data; Managing cyber security risks
Getting ready for industrial IoT; Visualizing the (applied) automation continuum; Preventing VFD faults and failures; Using wireless for closed-loop applications
Migrating industrial networks; Tracking HMI advances; Making the right automation changes
Understanding transfer switch operation; Coordinating protective devices; Analyzing NEC 2014 changes; Cooling data centers

Annual Salary Survey

After almost a decade of uncertainty, the confidence of plant floor managers is soaring. Even with a number of challenges and while implementing new technologies, there is a renewed sense of optimism among plant managers about their business and their future.

The respondents to the 2014 Plant Engineering Salary Survey come from throughout the U.S. and serve a variety of industries, but they are uniform in their optimism about manufacturing. This year’s survey found 79% consider manufacturing a secure career. That’s up from 75% in 2013 and significantly higher than the 63% figure when Plant Engineering first started asking that question a decade ago.

Read more: 2014 Salary Survey: Confidence rises amid the challenges

Maintenance and reliability tips and best practices from the maintenance and reliability coaches at Allied Reliability Group.
The One Voice for Manufacturing blog reports on federal public policy issues impacting the manufacturing sector. One Voice is a joint effort by the National Tooling and Machining...
The Society for Maintenance and Reliability Professionals an organization devoted...
Join this ongoing discussion of machine guarding topics, including solutions assessments, regulatory compliance, gap analysis...
IMS Research, recently acquired by IHS Inc., is a leading independent supplier of market research and consultancy to the global electronics industry.
Maintenance is not optional in manufacturing. It’s a profit center, driving productivity and uptime while reducing overall repair costs.
The Lachance on CMMS blog is about current maintenance topics. Blogger Paul Lachance is president and chief technology officer for Smartware Group.
This article collection contains several articles on the vital role that compressed air plays in manufacturing plants.