Machine Safety: Discourage the defeating of safety interlocks
There are people who intentionally defeat safety interlocks. Doesn’t this increase risk and hazard level? See 6 proactive actions to discourage disabling of safety interlocks, along with one additional technology-based solution.
You’re kidding me. Do you mean to say there actually are people who intentionally defeat safety interlocks? Doesn’t this mean that they have increased the hazard level?
Yes, there are folks in manufacturing who defeat safe guards, and safety interlocks are a prime example of such safe guards.
Machines or workcells have various types of access doors. There are fixed removable access doors, which are typically only removed for some level of maintenance procedures. In some cases these doors could have safety interlocks installed.
Another type of access doors are those designed and installed as removable and/or can be opened on a routine basis. Examples include: tooling set-up or adjustment, clean out of the work area for such things as swarf on metal cutting machines, working an awkwardly-shaped work piece or to perform a secondary manual operation simultaneously with a primary automated operation. Such access doors typically have safety interlocks installed to signal a safety-related function.
Upon inspection of a manufacturing area, either type of access door often have safety interlocks defeated with the intent of speeding up an activity. In some cases it may be because personnel around these machines have become so intimate with their surroundings that they feel they can safely operate the machines without guards. They may think they can take appropriate precautions because they’re all too aware of the hazards. In these cases, is management turning a blind eye to this practice?
Of course, “safety culture” are the first two words that come to mind.
The first thing I think of is a quote from Bill Hilton, director of health and safety at Georgia-Pacific: “A historical lack of accidents does not imply a current presence of safety. It simply means you’ve been faster than the machine."
So, what are some pro-active actions to consider for discouraging defeating of safety interlocks?
1. Update and/or conduct a risk assessment of your machine(s).
2. Review your safety culture to insure that it doesn’t allow dangerous behaviors.
3. Evaluate the design of access doors to make sure that all conditions are met.
4. Train personnel and conduct audits on proper procedures.
5. Document and keep required records current.
6. Consider a certified safety controller to monitor your safe interlocks.
On this final potential action of a safety certified controller, one best practice could include installing safety interlocks with both opposing normally open and normally closed contacts. The safety controller could then monitor the state and health of each set of contacts. An abnormal state would then automatically cause a safe state of operation for the machine with appropriate alarms annunciated.
Don’t we agree that most owners of manufacturing businesses don’t typically sleep well thinking their employees are properly protected because they will always be faster than the machine? Injuries do not improve productivity.
Has this presented you with any new perspectives? Add your comments or thoughts to the discussion by submitting your ideas, experiences, and challenges in the comments section below.
Machine Safety – designing a safe machine begins with Risk Assessment!
Case Study Database
Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Plant Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.
These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.
Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.
Annual Salary Survey
In a year when manufacturing continued to lead the economic rebound, it makes sense that plant manager bonuses rebounded. Plant Engineering’s annual Salary Survey shows both wages and bonuses rose in 2012 after a retreat the year before.
Average salary across all job titles for plant floor management rose 3.5% to $95,446, and bonus compensation jumped to $15,162, a 4.2% increase from the 2010 level and double the 2011 total, which showed a sharp drop in bonus.