SEARCH Archives
Loading
Sponsored by:

Machine Safety: Are you using planning and execution tools?

Machine guarding has clearly entered the technology world with integrated safety systems. But, are you still using 1970s approaches for planning and executing? Scotty didn’t beam colleagues to the Starship Enterprise via Hertz Rent-a-Car!

J.B. Titus

12/09/2011


JB Titus, CFSEMachine guarding has clearly entered the technology world with integrated safety systems. But, are you still using 1970s approaches for planning and executing? Scotty didn’t beam colleagues to the Starship Enterprise via Hertz Rent-a-Car!

   We’ve entered the twenty-first century with state-of-the-art technology approved for use in machine safety applications. Along with the technology comes a whole host of new tools specifically designed to assist industry in the evaluation, design, and validation stages of your machine guarding responsibility. This is really a subject where you can help your colleagues by sharing your experience with different tools. Let’s take a quick look at just a few of these tools.            

   One of the most recent tools was just announced last month in Chicago at Rockwell Automation’s Safety Automation Forum and Automation Fair. This new tool is an ROI (return on investment) calculation Tool for machine safety. Its primary application is in the project development stage for securing investment funding. This comprehensive tool is unique because it combines financial, injury, and productivity related data to calculate a projected investment ROI. A basic understanding is that the new integrated safety systems can provide improved business performance for manufacturers compared with conventional hard wired machine guarding solutions.

   Siemens, Pilz, and Rockwell Automation all have tools for users to design safety circuits compliant to IEC 62061 and EN ISO 13849-1. Projects can be archived and retrieved as needed for timely updates and the tools will also generate a safety standard compliant report which can be incorporated into your required machine documentation. They generally include a complete library of safety products for planning a complete safety circuit. All of these project planning and execution tools provide automatic calculations of requirements such as; common-cause failures (CCF), diagnostic coverage (DC), performance level (PL), safety integrity level (SIL), probability of a dangerous failure per hour (PFHD), and several more. Links to these tools are listed below:

 

   I’ve touched on just a few of the available tools developed over the past ten years for the specific purpose of supporting safety integrated systems for machine safety. What are your opinions of these tools and what additional tools have you used and found useful?

   Your comments or suggestion are always welcome so please let us know your thoughts. Submit your ideas, experiences, and challenges on this subject in the comments section below. Click on the following text if you don't see a comments box, then scroll down: Machine Safety: Are you using planning and execution tools? 

   Related articles:

How To Integrate Safety

Rockwell Automation ROI Tool

Siemens Safety Evaluation Tool

PILZ PAScal Safety Calculator

Rockwell Automation SISTEMA

Contact: www.jbtitus.com for “Solutions for Machine Safety”.



No comments
The Top Plant program honors outstanding manufacturing facilities in North America. The 2012 Top Plant winners have been named.
In 2012, Plant Engineering's Product of the Year program will celebrated its 25th anniversary. Read about the 2012 winners and nominate for 2013.
The Leaders Under 40 program features outstanding young people who are making a difference in manufacturing. View the 2012 Leaders here.
Investment in excellence: One plant's improved productivity and quality was repaid when their company expanded the facility
Strategic uptime, Increased capacity goes right to the bottom line
2013 Forecast Issue: A shift in manufacturing
Case Study Database

Case Study Database

Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Plant Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.

These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.

Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.

Alarm management tips, Power management, Building automation
Estimating data center PUE, Design tips for cost savings, Networked controls, NFPA 70E
Attacking Energy Costs: Strategies for showing financial return on energy management investments

2012 Salary Survey

In a year when manufacturing continued to lead the economic rebound, it makes sense that plant manager bonuses rebounded. Plant Engineering’s annual Salary Survey shows both wages and bonuses rose in 2012 after a retreat the year before.

Average salary across all job titles for plant floor management rose 3.5% to $95,446, and bonus compensation jumped to $15,162, a 4.2% increase from the 2010 level and double the 2011 total, which showed a sharp drop in bonus.

2012 Salary Survey Analysis

2012 Salary Survey Results


Poll of the Week

What category most helps you select new products?
Recommendation from colleagues
Product of the Year winners
Supplier information
Trade show visit


Click Here for Poll Archives
Sponsored by:

About Us | Contact Us | Advertise | Subscribe to Magazine | Site Map | Privacy Policy
Home | Channels | New Products | Media Library | Connect | Industry News | Events and Awards | Newsletters | Blogs | Magazine
Control Engineering | Plant Engineering | Consulting-Specifying Engineer
All content copyright © 2010-2013 CFE Media. All rights reserved.