Low energy Bluetooth wireless protocol

Bluetooth low energy technology isn’t just another Bluetooth revision—it’s a whole new technology that can benefit industrial communications.


There’s considerable interest in Bluetooth low energy technology regarding its possibilities. Bluetooth low energy technology also has some important limitations as well as benefits; it is quite different from Classic Bluetooth technology. It is so different that one carefully needs to consider which technology best fits the application needs.

Bluetooth technology was originally designed for continuous, streaming data applications, including voice, and has successfully eliminated wires in many consumer, industrial, and medical applications. Classic Bluetooth technology will continue to provide a robust wireless connection between devices, such as headsets, cars, industrial controllers, and streaming medical sensors. Many of these connections are not good candidates for new Bluetooth low energy technology, but many other new applications will be.

Bluetooth low energy technology was introduced in 2011 through the Bluetooth Specification v4.0 (Bluetooth v4.0). With its extremely low power consumption, unique characteristics, and new features, Bluetooth low energy technology enables new applications that were impractical with Classic Bluetooth technology. Coin cell battery-operated sensors and actuators in medical, industrial, consumer, and fitness applications (also known as “Smart”) can smoothly connect to Bluetooth low energy technology enabled  smartphones, tablets, or gateways (also known as “Smart Ready.”) Bluetooth low energy technology is ideal for applications requiring episodic or periodic transfer of small amounts of data.

Low power consumption

The key feature of Bluetooth low energy technology is its low power consumption that makes it possible to power a small device with a tiny coin cell battery, such as a CR2032 battery, for 5-10 years. (Click application image for video link.)

Bluetooth low energy technology is implemented in iPhone 4S whereby one can, via an app, read and send data to a Bluetooth low energy device (“smart” device). This demo shows a connectBlue low energy module equipped with temperature sensor, accelerometer,Just as with Classic Bluetooth technology, Bluetooth low energy technology operates in the 2.4 GHz ISM (industrial, scientific, and medical) radio band and has similar radio frequency (RF) output power; however, since a Bluetooth low energy device is in sleep mode most of the time and only wakes up when a connection is initiated, the power consumption can be kept to a minimum. Power consumption is kept low since the actual connection times are of only a few mS. The maximum/peak power consumption is only 15 mA and the average power consumption is only about 1 uA.

Features in common

Many features of Classic Bluetooth technology are inherited in Bluetooth low energy technology including Adaptive Frequency Hopping (AFH) as well as part of the Logical Link Control and Adaptation Protocol (L2CAP) interface.

Bluetooth low energy technology also implements the same link security with simple pairing modes, secure authentication, and encryption.

This inheritance makes Bluetooth low energy technology very easy to set up, robust, and reliable in tough environments.

Data transfer vs. battery

The use of low power consumption and coin cell battery operation also has its limitations. Data transfer rates with Classic Bluetooth technology using Enhanced Data Rate (Bluetooth v2.1 + EDR) can exceed 2 Mbps (actual payload), but practical transfer rates for Bluetooth low energy technology are below 100 kbps (actual payload of roughly 1/20). Therefore, streaming Bluetooth low energy connections will lose a great deal of the huge potential power savings as the use approaches continuous transmission.

In other words, some applications are better served with a Bluetooth low energy connection than others. Use varies depending on the type of device a sensor is connected to. (See geodetic instruments image.) 

Profile support differences

The behavior of a Bluetooth connection, whether Classic or low energy, is determined by the Bluetooth profiles a device has implemented. Devices can only connect if they each have the same Bluetooth profile implemented, and there are some important differences between profiles for Classic Bluetooth technology and those for Bluetooth low energy technology.

A good example of the differences is seen in serial port emulation. Classic Bluetooth technology provides the Serial Port Profile (SPP) for emulation of serial data connections. Bluetooth low energy technology provides no such support in standard Specification v4.0; although suppliers can provide a good level of support.

Many other profiles are not offered for Bluetooth low energy technology because of differences in the connection models. The Classic Bluetooth scenarios that are not part of Bluetooth low energy technology include headset (HSP), object exchange (OBEX), audio distribution (A2DP), video distribution (VDP), and file transfer (FTP). See the following table.

Classic vs. low energy Bluetooth



Classic Bluetooth technology


Bluetooth low energy technology


Data payload throughput (net)


2 Mbps


~100 kbps










Up to 1000m


Up to 250m


Local system density






Large scale network






Low latency






Connection setup speed






Power consumption




Very strong








New Bluetooth technology

In several key aspects, Bluetooth low energy technology is a totally new technology. For instance, the technology features very efficient discovery and connection setup, short data packages, and asymmetric design for small devices.

Just as with Classic Bluetooth technology, Bluetooth low energy technology is based on a master connected to a number of slaves. However, in Bluetooth low energy technology the number of slaves can be very large; how large depends on the implementation and available memory. The new “advertising” functionality makes it possible for a slave to announce that it has something to transmit to other devices that are “scanning.” “Advertising” messages can also include an event or a measurement value.

There also are differences in software structure. In Bluetooth low energy technology all parameters have a state that is accessed using the Attribute Protocol. Attributes are represented as characteristics that describe signal value, presentation format, client configuration, etc. The definitions of these attributes and characteristics along with their use make it possible to build numerous basic services and profiles like Proximity, Battery, Automation I/O, Building Automation, Lighting, Fitness, and Medical Devices. These nuances make the implementation seamless and compatible between devices from different manufacturers.

Single, dual modes

Because the two technologies are fundamentally different, there are the two following options for implementations:

  • Single-mode devices are stand-alone Bluetooth low energy devices (also known as “Smart” devices) optimized for small battery-operated devices with low cost and low power consumption in focus. Since the sensors have limited resources they may not be able to support the sensor role and the collector role. One example of a single-mode device is a heart-rate sensor.
  • Dual-mode devices (also known as “Smart Ready” devices) include both Bluetooth low energy technology and Classic Bluetooth technology. Dual-mode devices will rarely gain in power saving since they need to support both technology implementations; the power savings will only be achieved with the single-mode option. Dual-mode device examples include mobile phones and PCs.


Application selection

In other words, even if both technologies have a common name in “Bluetooth,” it is important to understand that the addition of Bluetooth low energy technology is not the same thing as when new versions of the Bluetooth Specification have been released in the past.  For some applications “Classic” is the best choice, and for others “low energy” is the best choice. Bluetooth low energy technology does not replace Classic Bluetooth technology—it is a whole new game.

- Rolf Nilsson is CEO and Bill Saltzstein is the U.S. president of connectBlue. Edited by Mark T. Hoske, content manager CFE Media, Control Engineering, Plant Engineering, and Consulting-Specifying Engineer, mhoske(at)cfemedia.com.

See connectBlue wireless technology comparisons

ONLINE extra

About the authors: Rolf Nilsson is the CEO and founder of connectBlue with more than 30 years of thorough insight and know-how from industrial automation and communication. Before founding connectBlue, Rolf was the President of Eurotherm Scandinavia, and before that he was in leading positions at Alfa Laval Automation/ABB Automation Products.

Bill Saltzstein is the U.S. president and the medical business development manager of connectBlue. with over 25 years of experience in medical device development and wireless technology.Prior to joining connectBlue, Bill worked as a wireless medical expert through his own company, Code Blue Communications, and product management and development positions at Medtronic Physio-Control, Instromedix, and Hewlett-Packard.

About connectBlue: connectBlue is a leading provider of robust industrial and medical wireless solutions, designed and tested for the most demanding applications and environments. Based on Bluetooth technology, Wireless LAN (WLAN) and IEEE 802.15.4 / ZigBee, connectBlue provides ready-to-use products and modules as well as custom design solutions. connectBlue has its head office in Sweden and local offices in Germany and the U.S.; connectBlue is a registered trademark of connectBlue AB.


See controleng.com/wireless for more about industrial wireless. 

No comments
The Top Plant program honors outstanding manufacturing facilities in North America. View the 2013 Top Plant.
The Product of the Year program recognizes products newly released in the manufacturing industries.
The Engineering Leaders Under 40 program identifies and gives recognition to young engineers who...
The true cost of lubrication: Three keys to consider when evaluating oils; Plant Engineering Lubrication Guide; 11 ways to protect bearing assets; Is lubrication part of your KPIs?
Contract maintenance: 5 ways to keep things humming while keeping an eye on costs; Pneumatic systems; Energy monitoring; The sixth 'S' is safety
Transport your data: Supply chain information critical to operational excellence; High-voltage faults; Portable cooling; Safety automation isn't automatic
Case Study Database

Case Study Database

Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Plant Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.

These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.

Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.

Maintaining low data center PUE; Using eco mode in UPS systems; Commissioning electrical and power systems; Exploring dc power distribution alternatives
Synchronizing industrial Ethernet networks; Selecting protocol conversion gateways; Integrating HMIs with PLCs and PACs
Why manufacturers need to see energy in a different light: Current approaches to energy management yield quick savings, but leave plant managers searching for ways of improving on those early gains.

Annual Salary Survey

Participate in the 2013 Salary Survey

In a year when manufacturing continued to lead the economic rebound, it makes sense that plant manager bonuses rebounded. Plant Engineering’s annual Salary Survey shows both wages and bonuses rose in 2012 after a retreat the year before.

Average salary across all job titles for plant floor management rose 3.5% to $95,446, and bonus compensation jumped to $15,162, a 4.2% increase from the 2010 level and double the 2011 total, which showed a sharp drop in bonus.

2012 Salary Survey Analysis

2012 Salary Survey Results

Maintenance and reliability tips and best practices from the maintenance and reliability coaches at Allied Reliability Group.
The One Voice for Manufacturing blog reports on federal public policy issues impacting the manufacturing sector. One Voice is a joint effort by the National Tooling and Machining...
The Society for Maintenance and Reliability Professionals an organization devoted...
Join this ongoing discussion of machine guarding topics, including solutions assessments, regulatory compliance, gap analysis...
IMS Research, recently acquired by IHS Inc., is a leading independent supplier of market research and consultancy to the global electronics industry.
Maintenance is not optional in manufacturing. It’s a profit center, driving productivity and uptime while reducing overall repair costs.
The Lachance on CMMS blog is about current maintenance topics. Blogger Paul Lachance is president and chief technology officer for Smartware Group.