SEARCH Archives
Loading
Sponsored by:

K-rated or harmonic mitigating transformers

Just as current harmonics can cause additional heating and losses in the magnetic core of a motor, they can produce much the same effect in the iron core of a transformer. However, greater losses from harmonics can occur in the windings of the transformer.

David Chesley, PE, LEED AP, RCDD, Interface Engineering, Portland, Ore.

09/17/2012


Eddy currents are circulating current in the conductors induced by the sweeping action of leakage magnetic field on the conductors. Eddy current concentrations are higher at the ends of transformer windings due to the crowding effect of the leakage magnetic fields at the coil extremities. Eddy current losses increase with the square of the frequency of the harmonic content of the current. Transformers that supply power to nonlinear loads generate more internal heat than if the same load was strictly linear in type, meaning that the transformers aren’t capable of meeting their nameplate capacities without running at damaging high temperatures. 

By the early 1980s, commercial buildings had a significantly high percentage of nonlinear loads in proportion to total load; as a result, overheating was regularly seen on heavily loaded transformers. Electrical manufacturers responded with transformers specially designed to handle harmonic-rich loads, called k-rated transformers. 

For this reason, where transformers will be serving nonlinear loads comprising more than 35% to 50% of their nameplate rating, k-rated transformers ensure the transformer does not overheat and possibly fail. 

The k-rating of a transformer is defined as highest k-factor load that the transformer can serve at its nameplate rating. In effect, the higher the k-factor, the more resulting heat the transformer is able to handle without exceeding its load carrying rating. In practical terms, the most common k-rated transformers typically have a k rating of 4, 7, 13, or 20, which corresponds to harmonic producing equipment totaling up to 35%, 50%, 75%, and 100% of downstream load, respectively. 

A key weakness of k-rated transformers is that while they reduce losses within the transformer itself, they do not actually reduce harmonics within the power system. Thus all loads connected to the secondary side of the transformer see the same voltage harmonics, and the upstream building electrical system is exposed to the current harmonics drawn by the transformer. 

Harmonic mitigating transformers (HMTs) are designed to greatly reduce certain harmonics based on their design, and thus reduce exposure to the rest of the electrical system from current harmonics drawn by downstream loads such as VFDs.



No comments
The Top Plant program honors outstanding manufacturing facilities in North America. The 2012 Top Plant winners have been named.
In 2012, Plant Engineering's Product of the Year program will celebrated its 25th anniversary. Read about the 2012 winners and nominate for 2013.
The Leaders Under 40 program features outstanding young people who are making a difference in manufacturing. View the 2012 Leaders here.
Investment in excellence: One plant's improved productivity and quality was repaid when their company expanded the facility
Strategic uptime, Increased capacity goes right to the bottom line
2013 Forecast Issue: A shift in manufacturing
Case Study Database

Case Study Database

Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Plant Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.

These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.

Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.

Alarm management tips, Power management, Building automation
Estimating data center PUE, Design tips for cost savings, Networked controls, NFPA 70E
Attacking Energy Costs: Strategies for showing financial return on energy management investments

2012 Salary Survey

In a year when manufacturing continued to lead the economic rebound, it makes sense that plant manager bonuses rebounded. Plant Engineering’s annual Salary Survey shows both wages and bonuses rose in 2012 after a retreat the year before.

Average salary across all job titles for plant floor management rose 3.5% to $95,446, and bonus compensation jumped to $15,162, a 4.2% increase from the 2010 level and double the 2011 total, which showed a sharp drop in bonus.

2012 Salary Survey Analysis

2012 Salary Survey Results


Poll of the Week

What category most helps you select new products?
Recommendation from colleagues
Product of the Year winners
Supplier information
Trade show visit


Click Here for Poll Archives
Sponsored by:

About Us | Contact Us | Advertise | Subscribe to Magazine | Site Map | Privacy Policy
Home | Channels | New Products | Media Library | Connect | Industry News | Events and Awards | Newsletters | Blogs | Magazine
Control Engineering | Plant Engineering | Consulting-Specifying Engineer
All content copyright © 2010-2013 CFE Media. All rights reserved.