Job scheduling/planning system integration yields profitable unattended operations

As manufacturers automate more of their processes, the payoff can be huge—both in cost savings and employee morale. That’s exactly the case for San Jose, Calif.-based Cypress Semiconductor, where employees once used pencil and paper to schedule jobs, says Rob Price, data warehouse manager for the San Jose, Calif.-based maker of computer chips and semiconductors used in data communications, telecommunications, computation, consumer products, and industrial control products.

08/01/2008


As manufacturers automate more of their processes, the payoff can be huge—both in cost savings and employee morale. That’s exactly the case for San Jose, Calif.-based Cypress Semiconductor, where employees once used pencil and paper to schedule jobs, says Rob Price, data warehouse manager for the San Jose, Calif.-based maker of computer chips and semiconductors used in data communications, telecommunications, computation, consumer products, and industrial control products.
Price says what made the situation particularly vexing was the sheer number of products, and all the possible configurations.
Cypress company management realized the need for a more refined scheduling system, but first looked to make better use of the planning system in use from i2 Technologies.
“To make optimal use of the i2 system, we needed a job scheduling solution,” Price says. “Not doing anything was out of the question—as was developing our own solution, which would have taken a number of programmers a long time to create.”
After reviewing some of the leading scheduling systems, Cypress selected ActiveBatch, an enterprise job scheduling solution from Advanced Systems Concepts said to be 10 times cheaper than others.
ActiveBatch is a cross-platform solution that structures tasks and applications into organized, integrated workflows. The result is reliable, unattended operations that trigger workflows based on date and time, events, or completion status.
Cypress is using ActiveBatch to orchestrate and coordinate jobs, Price says.
“As manufacturers become more sophisticated and global competition heats up, they need to automate as much as they can,” says Jim Manias, VP of Advanced Systems Concepts. “There’s a lot to be gained by eliminating manual hand-offs because that allows a company to reduce errors, production time, and operations costs. Those reductions can make a company more competitive.”
The problem is that automation by itself isn’t enough—particularly when more processes are being scheduled more frequently, Manias adds.
“In today’s world, events happen frequently and they can trigger subsequent events,” he says. “So the goal becomes not only to schedule across disparate systems, but also to know what to do when things don’t go right so operations don’t come to a standstill.”
That level of capability has become crucial for Cypress Semiconductor, whereby the company may chain together 100 jobs with numerous interdependencies, Price says. When one job is finished, its completion triggers the next job. A failure, on the other hand, might cause ActiveBatch to do something different or trigger an alarm, he says.
Additional benefits stem from knowing how long each job should take, Price says. That way, if a job takes too long, or is even completed too soon, ActiveBatch can send the correct alert or alarm, he says.
“Information about a job’s run time is documented for process improvement, along with data about all other jobs,” Price says. “That way we can go back and look at jobs based on run time and other factors to determine what went wrong and what went right—and make corresponding improvements to ensure jobs go right more frequently.”
The combination of the i2 planning system and the ActiveBatch solution for production planning and scheduling has driven significant improvements at Cypress, including the ability to cut its planning department by half, reduce inventory by 30 percent, and cut cycle time by 10 percent, Manias reports.





No comments
The Top Plant program honors outstanding manufacturing facilities in North America. View the 2013 Top Plant.
The Product of the Year program recognizes products newly released in the manufacturing industries.
The Engineering Leaders Under 40 program identifies and gives recognition to young engineers who...
The true cost of lubrication: Three keys to consider when evaluating oils; Plant Engineering Lubrication Guide; 11 ways to protect bearing assets; Is lubrication part of your KPIs?
Contract maintenance: 5 ways to keep things humming while keeping an eye on costs; Pneumatic systems; Energy monitoring; The sixth 'S' is safety
Transport your data: Supply chain information critical to operational excellence; High-voltage faults; Portable cooling; Safety automation isn't automatic
Case Study Database

Case Study Database

Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Plant Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.

These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.

Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.

Maintaining low data center PUE; Using eco mode in UPS systems; Commissioning electrical and power systems; Exploring dc power distribution alternatives
Synchronizing industrial Ethernet networks; Selecting protocol conversion gateways; Integrating HMIs with PLCs and PACs
Why manufacturers need to see energy in a different light: Current approaches to energy management yield quick savings, but leave plant managers searching for ways of improving on those early gains.

Annual Salary Survey

Participate in the 2013 Salary Survey

In a year when manufacturing continued to lead the economic rebound, it makes sense that plant manager bonuses rebounded. Plant Engineering’s annual Salary Survey shows both wages and bonuses rose in 2012 after a retreat the year before.

Average salary across all job titles for plant floor management rose 3.5% to $95,446, and bonus compensation jumped to $15,162, a 4.2% increase from the 2010 level and double the 2011 total, which showed a sharp drop in bonus.

2012 Salary Survey Analysis

2012 Salary Survey Results

Maintenance and reliability tips and best practices from the maintenance and reliability coaches at Allied Reliability Group.
The One Voice for Manufacturing blog reports on federal public policy issues impacting the manufacturing sector. One Voice is a joint effort by the National Tooling and Machining...
The Society for Maintenance and Reliability Professionals an organization devoted...
Join this ongoing discussion of machine guarding topics, including solutions assessments, regulatory compliance, gap analysis...
IMS Research, recently acquired by IHS Inc., is a leading independent supplier of market research and consultancy to the global electronics industry.
Maintenance is not optional in manufacturing. It’s a profit center, driving productivity and uptime while reducing overall repair costs.
The Lachance on CMMS blog is about current maintenance topics. Blogger Paul Lachance is president and chief technology officer for Smartware Group.