It’s time for IIoT; where do we begin?

IIoT can improve maintenance practices as well as managing energy costs, coordinating supply chains, and understanding how a plant operates.


Bob Vavra, content manager, Plant Engineering. Courtesy: CFE MediaThe idea of the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) is a grand reawakening of manufacturing. Many industry gurus call it a revolution, and there's very little evidence to suggest it is anything less. IIoT is the darling of manufacturing experts and media types. If it were a movie, it would be filmed in Technicolor and presented in CinemaScope, with Dolby Surround sound. IIoT is epic.

And perhaps that is IIoT's biggest problem today.

The idea that everyone could have access to every piece of data on the plant floor is overwhelming. Add in the idea that analytics could deliver the right data at the right time to the right person in the right context, and suddenly data became a tool to solve problems.

Strip away the theory and the hype, and you are left with some fundamental problems that IIoT can help solve for plant managers. IIoT can improve maintenance practices by better defining when a machine needs to be maintained, and it can end the strict time-based schedules.

IIoT also can be a great tool for managing energy costs, coordinating supply chains, understanding how and when work is done in assembly, and turning the manufacturing operation into a single organism as opposed to a departmentalized hierarchy. At Hannover Messe this year, the only word heard more often than 'collaboration' was 'democratization'. It is a brilliant theory. It is game-changing in its implications, and that this point in its development, it is going to be the way we work in the future. That's a daunting, almost overwhelming concept, especially for small to mid-sized manufacturers.

We are stuck in our current way of doing things. We have a largely competent manufacturing process that produces generally excellent products in a relatively timely and efficient manner.

We use the adjectives "largely," "generally," and "relatively" to hedge our bets, even though we'd be far happier with a manufacturing operation that is "competent" as opposed to one that is "relatively competent."

We hedge our bets because there is risk in change, and these already are risky times in which we live. Add to this the enormous scope of IIoT, and we are reluctant to gamble on the future when the present is so comfortable.

So, between a big gamble and inertia, where should manufacturers go? Find those areas in your plant where you have some room to experiment. Maybe your maintenance costs have gone up on a particular line, or your downtime is an issue. Perhaps there's a department where productivity could be better, or where bottlenecks are so common they now are part of the process.

There is room for improvement in all processes. Data will be the way to point to the improvements, and data will make a compelling case to secure the funding needed for the process improvements. Very often, cost savings alone can pay for a project.

Often what's lacking is leadership within the plant. An IHS Markit study presented at Hannover Messe discussed a number of key issues about IIoT implementation, and most revolved around whether IIoT is the IT department's project, or whether operations should take the lead. While it is clear C-suite support is crucial, the hard work will be done in the trenches with operations and IT collaborating.

It is time to begin to get better. I believe Plant Engineering's readers can provide that crucial leadership role around IIoT. It is time for the plant manager to lead on the issue of IIoT within manufacturing, because it will be the operations team that will turn the data into measurable improvement—into better maintenance and smarter production and increased efficiency.

You can lead the revolution, but you cannot lead it from the sidelines. It's time for a lunch with the IT department, and maybe a couple of other department heads. Ask one simple question:

"It's time; where do we begin?"

Bob Vavra is content manager, Plant Engineering, CFE Media,

The Top Plant program honors outstanding manufacturing facilities in North America. View the 2017 Top Plant.
The Product of the Year program recognizes products newly released in the manufacturing industries.
Each year, a panel of Control Engineering and Plant Engineering editors and industry expert judges select the System Integrator of the Year Award winners in three categories.
SCCR, 2018 Maintenance study, and VFDs in a washdown environment.
Welding ergonomics, 2017 Salary Survey, and surge protection
2017 Top Plant winner, Best practices, Plant Engineering at 70, Top 10 stories of 2017
Product of the Year winners, Pattern recognition, Engineering analytics, Revitalize older pump installations
Control room technology innovation; Practical approaches to corrosion protection; Pipeline regulator revises quality programs
The cloud, mobility, and remote operations; SCADA and contextual mobility; Custom UPS empowering a secure pipeline
Setting internal automation standards
Knowing how and when to use parallel generators
PID controllers, Solar-powered SCADA, Using 80 GHz radar sensors

Annual Salary Survey

Before the calendar turned, 2016 already had the makings of a pivotal year for manufacturing, and for the world.

There were the big events for the year, including the United States as Partner Country at Hannover Messe in April and the 2016 International Manufacturing Technology Show in Chicago in September. There's also the matter of the U.S. presidential elections in November, which promise to shape policy in manufacturing for years to come.

But the year started with global economic turmoil, as a slowdown in Chinese manufacturing triggered a worldwide stock hiccup that sent values plummeting. The continued plunge in world oil prices has resulted in a slowdown in exploration and, by extension, the manufacture of exploration equipment.

Read more: 2015 Salary Survey

Maintenance and reliability tips and best practices from the maintenance and reliability coaches at Allied Reliability Group.
The One Voice for Manufacturing blog reports on federal public policy issues impacting the manufacturing sector. One Voice is a joint effort by the National Tooling and Machining...
The Society for Maintenance and Reliability Professionals an organization devoted...
Join this ongoing discussion of machine guarding topics, including solutions assessments, regulatory compliance, gap analysis...
IMS Research, recently acquired by IHS Inc., is a leading independent supplier of market research and consultancy to the global electronics industry.
Maintenance is not optional in manufacturing. It’s a profit center, driving productivity and uptime while reducing overall repair costs.
The Lachance on CMMS blog is about current maintenance topics. Blogger Paul Lachance is president and chief technology officer for Smartware Group.
The maintenance journey has been a long, slow trek for most manufacturers and has gone from preventive maintenance to predictive maintenance.
This digital report explains how plant engineers and subject matter experts (SME) need support for time series data and its many challenges.
This digital report will explore several aspects of how IIoT will transform manufacturing in the coming years.
Maintenance Manager; California Oils Corp.
Associate, Electrical Engineering; Wood Harbinger
Control Systems Engineer; Robert Bosch Corp.
This course focuses on climate analysis, appropriateness of cooling system selection, and combining cooling systems.
This course will help identify and reveal electrical hazards and identify the solutions to implementing and maintaining a safe work environment.
This course explains how maintaining power and communication systems through emergency power-generation systems is critical.
click me