ISA88 Part 5 draft: Traditional automation designs for batch recipes

A series of discussions follow seeking input on possible language in ISA88 Part 5 draft standard, Figures 1-6 follow. Please provide comments at the bottom of this posting to ensure the standard is understandable, appropriate, and useful across industries and areas of control, machine control, batch control, and continuous control, as well as flexible and scalable, across hybrid applications.

04/30/2011


A series of discussions follow seeking input on possible language in ISA88 Part 5 draft standard, Figures 1-5 follow. Please provide comments at the bottom of this posting to ensure the standard is understandable, appropriate, and useful across industries and areas of control, machine control, batch control, and continuous control, as well as flexible and scalable, across hybrid applications.

Traditional

     To help in understanding the focus of Part 5 it is beneficial to discuss some of the dominate traditional approaches used to design, develop and deliver automation used to support ISA 88 batch recipes. The following discussion points provide insight into many of the different traditional approaches used in delivery of ISA 88 modular systems and contrasts those approaches with the recommendations of Part 5.

  • Traditional Equipment and Control Modules are custom engineered composites of automation components designed to meet the requirements of a functional strategy (FS) as represented in...

Figure 1: Traditional Automation Module.

Figure 1: Traditional Automation Module, ISA88 Part 5, draft

  • A functional strategy may consist of a totally custom design and implementation or it may utilize components provided by the suppliers of the automation control equipment as represented in Figure 2, which uses a function block provided by a vendor to implement a motor starter. The IEC 61915-2 specification provides methods to interact with function block described as part of that standard and can significantly reduce the amount of custom effort required to implement a FS. As indicated in Figure 2 there is generally additional functionality required to deliver the FS than is provided by the function blocks and the engineer must add that functionality and the methods to interact with the FS of that module. Often the methods and interfaces provide by the function blocks are not appropriate for general use and as part of the additional functionality the module must manage what is exposed and mange interaction with the components used to deliver the FS.

Example of some additional functionality: Simulation, management of permissives and interlocks, ability to bypass the function block and manipulate the outputs directly (Part 1 Automatic and Manual Mode), initialization functionality, alarm management, etc.

Figure 2: FS using vendor supplied function block

Figure 2: Functional strategy using vendor supplied function block, ISA88 Part 5 draft

  • Traditional modules may contain clearly defined methods that allow them to be commanded and controlled from an external source to carry out the functional strategy as represented in Figure 3. In some instances the interactions are obscure and require deep understanding of the FS implementation to be able to interact with it as indicated in Figure 4.

Figure 3: Clearly defined command and control

Figure 3: Clearly defined command and control, ISA88 Part 5 draft

Figure 4: Obscure command and control

Figure 4: Obscure command and control, ISA88 Part 5 draft

  • Command and control encompasses all the external interfaces, data in, status and data out, and commands to activate or change states and behavior as indicated in Figure 5: Command and Control Interfaces.

Figure 5: Command and Control Interfaces

Figure 5: Command and Control Interfaces, ISA88 Part 5 draft

  • These command and control methods are generally custom and are generally deep within the custom automation and require detailed understanding of the FS and the implementation to successfully interact with the module.

     Next post will discuss Figures 6-12.

     Comments? Questions? Suggestions? Please add them below. Cannot see the comment boxes? Click here and scroll down.



No comments
The Top Plant program honors outstanding manufacturing facilities in North America. View the 2015 Top Plant.
The Product of the Year program recognizes products newly released in the manufacturing industries.
The Engineering Leaders Under 40 program identifies and gives recognition to young engineers who...
2015 Top Plant: Phoenix Contact, Middletown, Pa.; 2015 Best Practices: Automation, Electrical Safety, Electrical Systems, Pneumatics, Material Handling, Mechanical Systems
A cool solution: Collaboration, chemistry leads to foundry coat product development; See the 2015 Product of the Year Finalists
Raising the standard: What's new with NFPA 70E; A global view of manufacturing; Maintenance data; Fit bearings properly
Special report: U.S. natural gas; LNG transport technologies evolve to meet market demand; Understanding new methane regulations; Predictive maintenance for gas pipeline compressors
Cyber security cost-efficient for industrial control systems; Extracting full value from operational data; Managing cyber security risks
Drilling for Big Data: Managing the flow of information; Big data drilldown series: Challenge and opportunity; OT to IT: Creating a circle of improvement; Industry loses best workers, again
Migrating industrial networks; Tracking HMI advances; Making the right automation changes
Understanding transfer switch operation; Coordinating protective devices; Analyzing NEC 2014 changes; Cooling data centers
Upgrading secondary control systems; Keeping enclosures conditioned; Diagnostics increase equipment uptime; Mechatronics simplifies machine design

Annual Salary Survey

After almost a decade of uncertainty, the confidence of plant floor managers is soaring. Even with a number of challenges and while implementing new technologies, there is a renewed sense of optimism among plant managers about their business and their future.

The respondents to the 2014 Plant Engineering Salary Survey come from throughout the U.S. and serve a variety of industries, but they are uniform in their optimism about manufacturing. This year’s survey found 79% consider manufacturing a secure career. That’s up from 75% in 2013 and significantly higher than the 63% figure when Plant Engineering first started asking that question a decade ago.

Read more: 2014 Salary Survey: Confidence rises amid the challenges

Maintenance and reliability tips and best practices from the maintenance and reliability coaches at Allied Reliability Group.
The One Voice for Manufacturing blog reports on federal public policy issues impacting the manufacturing sector. One Voice is a joint effort by the National Tooling and Machining...
The Society for Maintenance and Reliability Professionals an organization devoted...
Join this ongoing discussion of machine guarding topics, including solutions assessments, regulatory compliance, gap analysis...
IMS Research, recently acquired by IHS Inc., is a leading independent supplier of market research and consultancy to the global electronics industry.
Maintenance is not optional in manufacturing. It’s a profit center, driving productivity and uptime while reducing overall repair costs.
The Lachance on CMMS blog is about current maintenance topics. Blogger Paul Lachance is president and chief technology officer for Smartware Group.
This article collection contains several articles on the vital role that compressed air plays in manufacturing plants.