Interconnection, interoperability for integration in the Smart Grid

The relationship between interconnection and interoperability in the Smart Grid is often a source of confusion for engineers.


The relationship between interconnection and interoperability is often a sourceMark Siira. Courtesy: InterProse. of confusion for engineers. During the development of the IEEE 2030-2011 Smart Grid standard, it was a personal struggle for me to “get” the concept of interoperability and how it related to power systems interconnection. Once I understood the perspectives of Information Technology (IT) and Communication Technology (CT), I realized that the systems-of-systems view employed and recommended in the IEEE 2030-2011 Smart Grid guide standard was extremely powerful.

Interconnection is a widely known concept and the fundamental area covered by the IEEE 1547 series of standards. Generally it deals with all equipment and functions used to interconnect a distributed energy resource unit with an area electric power system (distribution system). Interconnection to the distribution system has been well documented and discussed in the IEEE 1547 series of standards.

Interoperability is the capability of multiple networks, systems, devices, applications, or components to exchange and use information securely and effectively. It is helpful to define the key terms describing the different perspective: IT classifies the types and methods of information exchanged between entities that interact with the Energy Storage System. This includes a fundamental classification as Command and Control (intermittent and/or periodic), Monitor Data (periodic), or Alerts & Alarms (intermittent). Additionally the purpose of the information exchanged could be: Operational/Functional, Management of Assets and Infrastructure, Regulatory, Pricing and Markets, or Security.

CT deals with the network paths available to transport that information. These parameters can include: protocols (IEEE 802), connection medium (wired, wireless), latency (milliseconds), and many others

Interoperability is used in many other standards. It is helpful to see how pervasive it is. The table below lists the definition of interoperability used in some other standards.



IEEE Std 1232-Standard for Artificial Intelligence and Expert System Tie to Automatic Test Equipment 

The ability of two or more systems or elements to exchange information and to use the information that has been exchanged          

ISO/IEC 14536 : 1995 [ANSI/IEEE Std 896.5, 1995 Edition] Information technology Microprocessor systems 

The capability for units of equipment to work together to do useful functions.

IEEE Std 1003.23-1998 IEEE Guide for Developing User Organization Open System Environment (OSE) 

The ability of two or more systems to exchange information and use the information that has been exchanged mutually

IEEE Std 610.12-1990 IEEE Standard Glossary of Software Engineering Terminology 

The ability of two or more systems or components to exchange information and to use the information that has been exchanged

Although some of them are no longer in use, you can see the pattern…

In Distributed Energy Resources systems, specifications commonly leave out specific requirements for CT and IT, deferring this to the utility.

The benefit of common nomenclature and recommendations for applications is that, over time, communication requirements will be specified using the same terms in the same order repeatedly, eventually leading to modular solutions. This will drive lead times and reduce cost. This is happening as the standards development community takes a deep dive into specific applications and defines these requirements, so they can be applied repeatedly. For example, the IEEE P2030.2 is developing a guide for applying these concepts to energy storage systems connected to the electric power system.

The most recent developments that lay a path to improving interoperability are included in the IEEE 2030 series of standards, with IEEE 2030-2011 being the cornerstone. This guide standard introduces the Smart Grid Interoperability Reference Model (SGIRM) that organizes all the functions and interconnections of a Smart Grid in terms of three separate perspectives that together comprise the Smart Grid:

  • The Power Systems (PS-IAP) Perspective defines the Smart Grid in terms of power entities and their interoperability.
  • The Communications Technology (CT-IAP) Perspective defines the Smart Grid in terms of communications paths.
  • The Information Technology (IT-IAP) perspective describes the Smart Grid in terms of information flows, entities, and protocols used to exchange that information.

In this Standard Guide IEEE 2030.2, we apply the SGIRM to electrical energy storage systems by defining the PS-IAP, CT-IAP and IT-IAP for specific applications and use cases of electrical storage systems.This is an important topic in that we will gradually see the CT and IT requirements communicated along with power systems requirements in specifications for projects and products. As the method and nomenclature become more familiar to consulting and specifying engineers, the entire system specification can become more modular. Modularity leads to subsystem optimization and may lead to lower total system costs. I suspect we may first see this in the modularity of SCADA, facility communication systems, and security systems.The electric power infrastructure is transforming from a system of power interconnections to a very complex diverse, interconnected, interdependent, and adaptive system. Work needs to continue to adapt interconnection standards to current needs. These efforts will lead to a better comprehension of interoperability requirements and the best approaches to interoperability.

Useful references:
IEEE 2030 Smart Grid Series
IEEE 1547 Interconnection Series
NIST Framework and Roadmap for Smart Grid Interoperability

Mark Siira, ComRent International, is chair of IEEE P2030.2 Guide for Interoperability of Energy Storage Systems to the EPS.

No comments
The Top Plant program honors outstanding manufacturing facilities in North America. View the 2013 Top Plant.
The Product of the Year program recognizes products newly released in the manufacturing industries.
The Engineering Leaders Under 40 program identifies and gives recognition to young engineers who...
A cool solution: Collaboration, chemistry leads to foundry coat product development; See the 2015 Product of the Year Finalists
Raising the standard: What's new with NFPA 70E; A global view of manufacturing; Maintenance data; Fit bearings properly
Sister act: Building on their father's legacy, a new generation moves Bales Metal Surface Solutions forward; Meet the 2015 Engineering Leaders Under 40
Cyber security cost-efficient for industrial control systems; Extracting full value from operational data; Managing cyber security risks
Drilling for Big Data: Managing the flow of information; Big data drilldown series: Challenge and opportunity; OT to IT: Creating a circle of improvement; Industry loses best workers, again
Pipeline vulnerabilities? Securing hydrocarbon transit; Predictive analytics hit the mainstream; Dirty pipelines decrease flow, production—pig your line; Ensuring pipeline physical and cyber security
Upgrading secondary control systems; Keeping enclosures conditioned; Diagnostics increase equipment uptime; Mechatronics simplifies machine design
Designing positive-energy buildings; Ensuring power quality; Complying with NFPA 110; Minimizing arc flash hazards
Building high availability into industrial computers; Of key metrics and myth busting; The truth about five common VFD myths

Annual Salary Survey

After almost a decade of uncertainty, the confidence of plant floor managers is soaring. Even with a number of challenges and while implementing new technologies, there is a renewed sense of optimism among plant managers about their business and their future.

The respondents to the 2014 Plant Engineering Salary Survey come from throughout the U.S. and serve a variety of industries, but they are uniform in their optimism about manufacturing. This year’s survey found 79% consider manufacturing a secure career. That’s up from 75% in 2013 and significantly higher than the 63% figure when Plant Engineering first started asking that question a decade ago.

Read more: 2014 Salary Survey: Confidence rises amid the challenges

Maintenance and reliability tips and best practices from the maintenance and reliability coaches at Allied Reliability Group.
The One Voice for Manufacturing blog reports on federal public policy issues impacting the manufacturing sector. One Voice is a joint effort by the National Tooling and Machining...
The Society for Maintenance and Reliability Professionals an organization devoted...
Join this ongoing discussion of machine guarding topics, including solutions assessments, regulatory compliance, gap analysis...
IMS Research, recently acquired by IHS Inc., is a leading independent supplier of market research and consultancy to the global electronics industry.
Maintenance is not optional in manufacturing. It’s a profit center, driving productivity and uptime while reducing overall repair costs.
The Lachance on CMMS blog is about current maintenance topics. Blogger Paul Lachance is president and chief technology officer for Smartware Group.