Intelligent Vision Stops Bypass of Quality Control

Operators sometimes employ clever and often low-tech strategies for bypassing a vision-based label quality-control system. Sometimes they simply shut off the system and let products go through. Other times, they place an image of a good product in front of the camera to allow the lesser quality labels to go by.

05/01/2009


Machine Vision, May '09, Control Engineering

Other articles in the May 2009 Control Engineering North American print edition supplement:
- 415 Parts Seen
- Motion and Vision Combine to Detect Flaws
- The New Look of Facial Recognition

Operators sometimes employ clever and often low-tech strategies for bypassing a vision-based label quality-control system. Sometimes they simply shut off the system and let products go through. Other times, they place an image of a good product in front of the camera to allow the lesser quality labels to go by. Makers of a global brand of personal care products recently found some of its own operators were breaking the rules this way.

The company asked CI Vision (Aurora, IL), for a new vision inspection system with a mechanism to prevent plant staff from bypassing it. CI Vision’s “Anti-Vision Circumvention Technology” turned out to be a useful feature of its Pro Series inspection system.

The base model of the Pro Series system has two cameras in steel housings connected via the GigE Vision camera interface standard. Up to four cameras can be installed, and the vision system is controlled either by a custom-built PC or Matrox 4Sight X industrial PC. The CIVCore software that controls the image acquisition and inspection tasks is built from the Matrox Imaging Library (MIL).

CI Vision

CI Vision's label image acquisition and inspection software is built from the Matrox Imaging Library

To inspect a product batch, an operator sets up the inspection type on a touchscreen. When an image is acquired, normalized grayscale correlation is used to determine the presence or absence of the label itself, as well as the location of the label’s region of interest (a bar or matrix code, or a lot number). Code 128 bar and two-dimensional data matrix codes are read by MIL’s code module for correctness. The CIVCore’s OCV module, which is built from MIL’s pattern matching and image processing modules, reads text-based lot numbers and label control numbers.

The Pro Series system features an optional tool that detects if the same label appears on the front and back of the product. The system uses the search model from the presence/absence feature to determine which label is in front of Camera 1. With that result, the system automatically instructs Camera 2 to look for the other label. If the second camera fails to find it, the system concludes that the product has the same label on both sides.

If a product fails any inspection, it gets flagged and diverted off the line. But, as this manufacturer had discovered, sometimes operators let non-conforming labels go through. Rick Koval, lead software engineer at CI Vision, implemented a three-part strategy to ensure the system inspects 100% of the products:

Step one . Make sure that the vision system operated with other automation equipment at all times. When the labeler is running, the vision system must also be running.

Step two . During operation, use image acquisition trigger inputs as a mechanism for determining the product’s presence so it can be inspected. If a certain number of seconds pass without a trigger while the labeler’s 'run’ signal is detected, the vision system faults and outputs a signal to shut down the line. Similarly, when there is no 'run’ signal and the vision system receives triggers, the labeler also signals to shutdown the line.

Step three . To detect fake images, check for movement between acquired images by comparing translation results. Locations are compared from image to image over the sequence of acquired images. If a certain number of images indicate no movement between them, the current part and all future parts will fail.

www.civision.com , www.matrox.com/imaging





No comments
The Top Plant program honors outstanding manufacturing facilities in North America. View the 2013 Top Plant.
The Product of the Year program recognizes products newly released in the manufacturing industries.
The Engineering Leaders Under 40 program identifies and gives recognition to young engineers who...
The true cost of lubrication: Three keys to consider when evaluating oils; Plant Engineering Lubrication Guide; 11 ways to protect bearing assets; Is lubrication part of your KPIs?
Contract maintenance: 5 ways to keep things humming while keeping an eye on costs; Pneumatic systems; Energy monitoring; The sixth 'S' is safety
Transport your data: Supply chain information critical to operational excellence; High-voltage faults; Portable cooling; Safety automation isn't automatic
Case Study Database

Case Study Database

Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Plant Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.

These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.

Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.

Maintaining low data center PUE; Using eco mode in UPS systems; Commissioning electrical and power systems; Exploring dc power distribution alternatives
Synchronizing industrial Ethernet networks; Selecting protocol conversion gateways; Integrating HMIs with PLCs and PACs
Why manufacturers need to see energy in a different light: Current approaches to energy management yield quick savings, but leave plant managers searching for ways of improving on those early gains.

Annual Salary Survey

Participate in the 2013 Salary Survey

In a year when manufacturing continued to lead the economic rebound, it makes sense that plant manager bonuses rebounded. Plant Engineering’s annual Salary Survey shows both wages and bonuses rose in 2012 after a retreat the year before.

Average salary across all job titles for plant floor management rose 3.5% to $95,446, and bonus compensation jumped to $15,162, a 4.2% increase from the 2010 level and double the 2011 total, which showed a sharp drop in bonus.

2012 Salary Survey Analysis

2012 Salary Survey Results

Maintenance and reliability tips and best practices from the maintenance and reliability coaches at Allied Reliability Group.
The One Voice for Manufacturing blog reports on federal public policy issues impacting the manufacturing sector. One Voice is a joint effort by the National Tooling and Machining...
The Society for Maintenance and Reliability Professionals an organization devoted...
Join this ongoing discussion of machine guarding topics, including solutions assessments, regulatory compliance, gap analysis...
IMS Research, recently acquired by IHS Inc., is a leading independent supplier of market research and consultancy to the global electronics industry.
Maintenance is not optional in manufacturing. It’s a profit center, driving productivity and uptime while reducing overall repair costs.
The Lachance on CMMS blog is about current maintenance topics. Blogger Paul Lachance is president and chief technology officer for Smartware Group.