Industrial wireless monitoring and sensing

Applying industrial wireless applications to monitoring and sensing can serve as a risk management policy. Strong communications address many challenges facility operators face during process transformations.

05/14/2013


Industrial wireless can be easier to implement when referencing a reference architecture, which can serve as a critical infrastructure integrity monitoring (CIIM) model. Courtesy: SAICWireless technology is a constantly evolving area, especially for industrial users, which often makes wireless infrastructure deployments in industrial environments difficult. Before taking on such a project, facility operators need to be aware of the challenges from rapid prototyping of wireless sensors in an industrial environment and the best practices for radio frequency (RF) design in complex or harsh RF environments, such as manufacturing, industrial, or power generation facilities.

The business drivers for this type of project can most often be associated with the transition from conditioned-based monitoring to performance-based monitoring. The conditioned-based monitoring approach typically means lack of on-line data to support diagnostics, and poor data alignment (such as with data residing in separate databases). In addition, the data points are usually collected manually, and the lack of continuous data does not allow for complex analytics or modeling.

Implementing wireless sensor sets create benefits across multiple areas. For instance, scarce engineering resources can focus on data analysis rather than data collection from disparate sources and can concentrate on few degrading trends rather than every trend. Maintenance workers can reduce or entirely eliminate selected data collection rounds through placement of wireless monitoring sensors. The need for deep technical capabilities on-site and concerns about inconsistent diagnostic results due to experience levels of individual employees can be greatly reduced.

By leveraging wireless technologies, operators can acquire critical component monitoring data in significantly higher volumes, reduce staff impact of making collection rounds, and focus those resources on data analysis and prognostics of issues. By implementing a wireless infrastructure and using it for the rapid deployment of new sensor types, operators can create significant advances in critical component monitoring.

Clear wireless infrastructure design

A haphazard approach to wireless infrastructure project strategy can create huge cost and end user satisfaction issues. Even with good performance parameters, failure can occur if they are for the wrong application. To design the project for success, start with a solid system integration approach and define the business case and a clear concept of operations (ConOps). At the very least, list and prioritize applications.

The approach, business case, and ConOps should drive technical specification and help manage end-user and client expectations. With this in hand, the throughput needs can be defined. These will affect technical decisions, such as access point density, backhaul infrastructure, switching, power requirements, cable/fiber runs, and facility penetrations, among others.

Next, focus on the RF design process. Major steps in the RF design process should include passive and active surveys. Start with a passive survey for RF data collection, spectrum analysis, building composition analysis, and the outdoor features/topology noted. The deliverable after the passive survey should be the preliminary design. Once complete, all of the data can be imported into the RF modeling software to generate the preliminary model and design.

Once the preliminary design is finalized, the active survey can start at the facility. The active survey should validate the exercise for the preliminary access point placements. Measure the actual signal performance and confirm the final design approach. Once approved, it is critical to work with the plant information technology staff and engineer of record to formulate the build package and for iterative reviews of design during the installation process as issues arise. After commissioning, designers should return to the facility for testing and tweaking of the operational system for optimal performance. This last step is often overlooked but is critical for successful implementation.

Critical infrastructure problem

Critical infrastructures have their own unique monitoring needs that are not being met, but a strategically planned wireless infrastructure deployment approach may help alleviate some challenges. Critical infrastructure systems are increasingly a complex blend of old and new systems with varying tolerances and management requirements. Aging infrastructure is expensive to instrument, monitor, and maintain. Often, this causes accidents. New infrastructure has its own set of issues and can generate an unmanageable “firehose” of uncorrelated data.

To complicate things further, today’s compliance requirements are reactionary and constantly evolving, and the market is flooded with fragmented point solutions. Right now, the industry lacks a clear “systems approach.” Accidents, shutdowns, and cyber attacks can occur with a failure to monitor and act, so a well-developed wireless deployment plan is even more important on a critical infrastructure project.


<< First < Previous 1 2 Next > Last >>

Jonas , Singapore, 12/23/13 09:20 PM:

For wireless sensor networks in process applications, it looks to me as if the industry is narrowing it down to IEC 52591 (WirelessHART) technology based on IEEE 802.15.4 radio with mesh topology. Broadband applications use IEEE 802.11 (Wi-Fi). This narrowing down makes wireless infrastructure deployments easier than it was in the past.

I agree plants need to be aware of the challenges of wireless sensors in an industrial environment and the best practices for radio frequency (RF) communication in environments full of steel such as vessels, pipe racks, and structural steel found in a plant. A full mesh topology excels in this environment.

I agree existing plants lack on-line data to support diagnostics; the data is usually collected manually. I believe this is because most plants were built years ago with only a minimal amount of instrumentation necessary required to safely operate the process, because 4-20 mA and on/off signals are expensive due to the large amount of cable, conduit, junction boxes, cable tray, installation labor, marshalling cabinets, system cabinets, and I/O cards etc. Improving process unit utilization, energy efficiency, reducing maintenance costs, and mitigating safety and environmental incidents to stay competitive requires additional automation, but the necessary data is not available. These are missing measurements. But ageing plants can be modernized with wireless.

I agree implementing wireless sensor networks create benefits across multiple areas. For instance, process equipment diagnostics (commonly referred to as ‘type 4’ diagnostics) improve process equipment reliability, reducing downtime, while minimizing maintenance cost and more effectively scheduling turnarounds by continuously diagnosing which equipment require maintenance and which don’t. Potential equipment includes heat exchangers, pumps, blowers, air cooled exchangers (fin-fans), unmonitored compressors, and cooling towers etc. Furthermore, the equipment diagnostics, for instance on equipment onboard a FPSO or FLNG vessel, or a platform etc, can be accessed remotely by experts from an onshore center of operations in an integrated operations (iOps) scenario. Another area benefitting from modernization is automatic energy monitoring to drive energy conservation measures for generation, consumption, and loss to improve energy efficiency thus reducing cost.

A third area of benefits is automatic HS&E monitoring to reduce personnel exposure (reduced operator clipboard rounds), detect hazards, record emissions, and provide operators increased situational awareness thus benefitting health, safety, and environmental as well as for associated regulatory compliance should also be part of modernization.

A primary layer of automation already exists in plants using hardwired or fieldbus signals to the control and safety systems covering functions “on the P&ID”. A new second layer of automation uses wireless sensor networks mainly to the asset management system for monitoring of missing measurements with pervasive sensing going beyond the P&ID for maintenance, reliability, HS&E, and energy personnel in offices beyond the control room. By eliminating wires, deployment is accelerated and low risk, possible during a turnaround or even while the plant is running.

Wireless sensors and software enable plant personnel to become more effective

I also agree that a wrong approach to wireless infrastructure architecture can create huge cost and dissatisfaction. For instance, I personally believe use of a full multi-hop multi-path mesh topology is a critical success factor for high reliability as well as for easy and low risk deployment. Other topologies may require costly backbone router infrastructure which is disruptive to install.

A modernization guide is available to help engineering from justification and scope, to design, installation, and handover.

I agree that until now, aging infrastructure is expensive to instrument, monitor, and maintain. However, WirelessHART changes this. The WirelessHART mesh network reduces the cost and risk of deploying sensors around an aging plant.

Interestingly, most of the new data does not go to the control or safety system operator consoles in the control room. Most additional data goes beyond the control room, for instance to the maintenance and reliability office, presented as KPI and equipment dashboards, not as an animated P&ID. To avoid the data “fire hose” the raw data from wireless instruments is aggregated in essential asset monitoring software with pre-engineered modules for pumps, heat exchangers, air cooled exchangers, cooling towers, blowers, unmonitored compressors, filters & strainers, as well as pipes & vessels. Multi-parametric algorithms embedded into the software provide easy-to-understand process equipment diagnostic information.

Once wireless sensor networks have been deployed plant-wide, the plant is prepared to quickly and easily add more automation as needed in the future to meet shifting and evolving industry demands.
New plants should be built including wireless sensor networks from the very beginning. Do not design in traditional operator rounds.

I agree that the market is flooded with proprietary wireless network solutions which would result in fragmented point solutions. The IEC 62591 (WirelessHART) standard finally provides a single common network infrastructure, a “systems approach” for all applications: steam trap monitoring, relief valve monitoring, and process equipment monitoring and many more, eliminating needs for multiple proprietary wireless solutions.

Personally I totally agree that planning maintenance for aging legacy equipment is difficult because they are “un-instrumented”. Being able to deploy a second layer of automation based on WirelessHART instrumentation and communication can allow for better operational monitoring and maintenance planning and reduce downtime.

There is no need to migrate or upgrade the control system to deploy a second layer of automation based on WirelessHART. The gateway interfaces with modern as well as legacy DCS and PLC using standard backhaul protocols. Moreover, most of the data may not go to the control system, but direct to asset management system or other applications.

I like the expression “bug-like”. The sensors are wireless and are stuck onto equipment etc. everywhere, snooping on these equipment, overhearing what’s going on, reporting back their status. One reason wireless sensors are low cost is because they are non-intrusive. There is no wiring for power. No wiring for signal I/O. That is, electrical installation is non-intrusive. In many cases non-intrusive mechanical installation is also possible: there may be existing thermowells or tapping points for installation of temperature sensors and pressure transmitters. Clamp-on surface temperature transmitters can also be used. Pressure transmitters can be installed where pressure gauges previously were mounted. Valve position feedback bolt onto hand operated valves like bypass valves. Vibration sensors can either be screwed on the outside, glued on, or even use a magnet. Acoustic transmitters for monitoring of valve leaks, relief valve activation, and steam trap health simply strap onto the outside of the pipe using hose clamp. In many cases new process penetrations need not be drilled, cut, or welded. That is, not only low installed cost, but low installed risk.

Learn more from this blog:
http://community.emerson.com/process/emerson-exchange/b/weblog/archive/2013/10/03/why-are-there-missing-measurements.aspx

Indeed wireless sensors are very fast to install and provision/commission.

IEC 62591 (WirelessHART) is the international standard for wireless in process applications. It is supported by multiple vendors ensuring wireless transmitters and gateways from these vendors are compatible and interoperate. The plant can deploy a single cohesive network architecture used for all their wireless sensors maximizing the use of the system. Because it is a standard, technology obsolescence is staved off. WirelessHART devices are tested and registered for compliance with the IEC 62591 standard.

The interface between the WirelessHART networks and the control system and asset management system is using the HART-IP, Modbus/RTU, Modbus/TCP, or EtherNet/IP protocols in any combination. OPC is often used too as a software interface, but proprietary APIs are not used.

All these improvements are possible without adding any control loops and without migrating the control system.

WirelessHART enables existing sites to be modernized & sustained in ways previously not possible, benefitting both operations and maintenance. Start by requesting the user’s guide to how to modernize and sustain an old plant using a second layer of automation for pervasive sensing of missing measurements found beyond the P&ID. The guide covers the modernization process from justification and audit to commissioning and handover. The guide can also be used for new projects to deploy plant-wide wireless infrastructure, to make sure the new plant is not built to be run & maintained the old way.

Plant modernization is a new EPC business model. EPCs can go back to all the plants they have build over the past 20-30 years and offer all the above plant modernization by means of a second layer of automation based on WirelessHART.
The Top Plant program honors outstanding manufacturing facilities in North America. View the 2013 Top Plant.
The Product of the Year program recognizes products newly released in the manufacturing industries.
The Engineering Leaders Under 40 program identifies and gives recognition to young engineers who...
The true cost of lubrication: Three keys to consider when evaluating oils; Plant Engineering Lubrication Guide; 11 ways to protect bearing assets; Is lubrication part of your KPIs?
Contract maintenance: 5 ways to keep things humming while keeping an eye on costs; Pneumatic systems; Energy monitoring; The sixth 'S' is safety
Transport your data: Supply chain information critical to operational excellence; High-voltage faults; Portable cooling; Safety automation isn't automatic
Case Study Database

Case Study Database

Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Plant Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.

These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.

Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.

Maintaining low data center PUE; Using eco mode in UPS systems; Commissioning electrical and power systems; Exploring dc power distribution alternatives
Synchronizing industrial Ethernet networks; Selecting protocol conversion gateways; Integrating HMIs with PLCs and PACs
Why manufacturers need to see energy in a different light: Current approaches to energy management yield quick savings, but leave plant managers searching for ways of improving on those early gains.

Annual Salary Survey

Participate in the 2013 Salary Survey

In a year when manufacturing continued to lead the economic rebound, it makes sense that plant manager bonuses rebounded. Plant Engineering’s annual Salary Survey shows both wages and bonuses rose in 2012 after a retreat the year before.

Average salary across all job titles for plant floor management rose 3.5% to $95,446, and bonus compensation jumped to $15,162, a 4.2% increase from the 2010 level and double the 2011 total, which showed a sharp drop in bonus.

2012 Salary Survey Analysis

2012 Salary Survey Results

Maintenance and reliability tips and best practices from the maintenance and reliability coaches at Allied Reliability Group.
The One Voice for Manufacturing blog reports on federal public policy issues impacting the manufacturing sector. One Voice is a joint effort by the National Tooling and Machining...
The Society for Maintenance and Reliability Professionals an organization devoted...
Join this ongoing discussion of machine guarding topics, including solutions assessments, regulatory compliance, gap analysis...
IMS Research, recently acquired by IHS Inc., is a leading independent supplier of market research and consultancy to the global electronics industry.
Maintenance is not optional in manufacturing. It’s a profit center, driving productivity and uptime while reducing overall repair costs.
The Lachance on CMMS blog is about current maintenance topics. Blogger Paul Lachance is president and chief technology officer for Smartware Group.