Identifying the causes and fixes for robotic welding troubles

Five common issues and solutions to save time and money

04/15/2013


Robotic welding systems are built for speed, accuracy, and repeatability. Knowing how to troubleshoot problems quickly and effectively can help prevent issues with quality, productivity, and costs. Courtesy: TregaskissKnowing how to troubleshoot quickly and efficiently is critical in any welding operation. For robotic welding systems it is especially important, as there is a lot at stake when something goes wrong in the process. These systems are built specifically for speed, accuracy, and repeatability. Therefore, any downtime to address problems can adversely affect the quality and productivity improvements sought by investing in the equipment. It can also lead to increased costs.

When a problem occurs with a robotic welding system, it’s valuable to identify any variables that may have recently changed. Asking questions like the following may be beneficial:

  • Has a welding operator recently reprogrammed the robot?
  • Has the robot recently been restarted after a long shutdown?
  • Have there been any changes with the consumables or robotic MIG gun?

 

 

In many cases, it may be a simple fix to get the robotic welding system back up and running. To help in the process, consider these causes and remedies for robotic welding troubles to get back to welding sooner.

Trouble 1: Poor wire feeding

Causes:
There are two key causes to poor wire feeding in a robotic welding system: one, issues with the liner such as debris buildup; or two, an improperly functioning wire feeder, particularly the drive rolls. A third issue, wire cable kinking, can sometimes lead to poor wire feeding performance, too. Regardless of the cause, the result is typically the same: poor arc and weld quality. 

Remedies: To prevent and/or address issues with the liner, be certain to change out this component during routine maintenance. Doing so helps prevent debris from building up inside, either from the welding wires or the shop environment.

Using a robotic MIG gun with an “air blast” feature is also very helpful to eliminate debris. This feature blows air through the liner during scheduled downtime in the robotic welding cycle. That downtime may be during a reaming or cleaning cycle and/or during parts changeover. In the absence of an air blast feature, welding operators can also manually blow compressed air through the liner.

If a welding operator suspects that the drive rolls may be the culprits of poor wire feeding, there are two options to assess the situation. One, visually inspect the drive rolls for signs of wear. Over time, these components can become worn and may not guide the welding wire properly. The welding operator  can also conduct a “two-finger” test: Disengage the drive rolls, grasp the welding wire, and pull it through the gun. If the wire pulls through easily, it is likely that the drive rolls are the cause of the poor wire feeding. In both instances, replace the drive rolls as necessary.

Finally, look for kinks in the power cable, as these can also lead to wire feeding problems. Unwind and straighten the cable as necessary.

Trouble 2: Welds are inconsistent or off-location

Causes: Inconsistent or off-location welds are the antithesis of what companies desire from a robotic welding system. Often this problem is the result of an issue with the tool center point (TCP). TCP is the focal point of a tool; in the case of a robotic welding system, it is the location of the robotic MIG gun to the position of the welding wire in the joint (gun-to-work distance). Typically, TCP issues occur after a collision that causes the robotic MIG gun neck to bend.

Variations in part fit-up or fixturing can also cause inconsistent or off-location welds.

Remedies: To rectify issues with TCP (particularly after a collision), welding operators need to bend the neck back to the proper angle. A neck-checking fixture or neck alignment tool is the best tool for this task.  It is also important to check that the neck has been installed correctly. If the neck isn’t fully seated, it may extend too far and lead to TCP problems. Program a TCP check to verify the proper neck position to protect against future issues.

There are steps to take to differentiate between inconsistent welds caused by a TCP problem versus a part fit-up or fixture problem. First, remove the robotic MIG neck, implement a TCP check via the robotic program, and verify that everything is on-location. If everything checks out properly, the problem is likely a part or position variation.

Check that the fixturing and robot base are both securely in place—any movement in these components can cause inconsistency in the welds. Also, check for part variations and rectify these accordingly. 


<< First < Previous 1 2 Next > Last >>

No comments
The Top Plant program honors outstanding manufacturing facilities in North America. View the 2013 Top Plant.
The Product of the Year program recognizes products newly released in the manufacturing industries.
The Engineering Leaders Under 40 program identifies and gives recognition to young engineers who...
The true cost of lubrication: Three keys to consider when evaluating oils; Plant Engineering Lubrication Guide; 11 ways to protect bearing assets; Is lubrication part of your KPIs?
Contract maintenance: 5 ways to keep things humming while keeping an eye on costs; Pneumatic systems; Energy monitoring; The sixth 'S' is safety
Transport your data: Supply chain information critical to operational excellence; High-voltage faults; Portable cooling; Safety automation isn't automatic
Case Study Database

Case Study Database

Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Plant Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.

These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.

Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.

Maintaining low data center PUE; Using eco mode in UPS systems; Commissioning electrical and power systems; Exploring dc power distribution alternatives
Synchronizing industrial Ethernet networks; Selecting protocol conversion gateways; Integrating HMIs with PLCs and PACs
Why manufacturers need to see energy in a different light: Current approaches to energy management yield quick savings, but leave plant managers searching for ways of improving on those early gains.

Annual Salary Survey

Participate in the 2013 Salary Survey

In a year when manufacturing continued to lead the economic rebound, it makes sense that plant manager bonuses rebounded. Plant Engineering’s annual Salary Survey shows both wages and bonuses rose in 2012 after a retreat the year before.

Average salary across all job titles for plant floor management rose 3.5% to $95,446, and bonus compensation jumped to $15,162, a 4.2% increase from the 2010 level and double the 2011 total, which showed a sharp drop in bonus.

2012 Salary Survey Analysis

2012 Salary Survey Results

Maintenance and reliability tips and best practices from the maintenance and reliability coaches at Allied Reliability Group.
The One Voice for Manufacturing blog reports on federal public policy issues impacting the manufacturing sector. One Voice is a joint effort by the National Tooling and Machining...
The Society for Maintenance and Reliability Professionals an organization devoted...
Join this ongoing discussion of machine guarding topics, including solutions assessments, regulatory compliance, gap analysis...
IMS Research, recently acquired by IHS Inc., is a leading independent supplier of market research and consultancy to the global electronics industry.
Maintenance is not optional in manufacturing. It’s a profit center, driving productivity and uptime while reducing overall repair costs.
The Lachance on CMMS blog is about current maintenance topics. Blogger Paul Lachance is president and chief technology officer for Smartware Group.