Green Automation: Thomson-RCA energy monitoring cuts energy costs

Assigning accurate costs to compressed air, chill water, and steam generation allowed more efficient use of resources at a Thomson RCA plant and annual savings of $35,000 for compressed air alone. Electrical demand, power, pressure, and flow are among measured variables.

02/21/2011


Accurate knowledge of the cost of energy production allows for more efficient use of resources for compressed air, chill water, and produce steam in a multi-building Thomson-RCA facility in Indianapolis, IN.

Energy Monitoring at Thomson-RCA

The energy management and information system, connected with automation hardware and software, uses analog and digital connections to field equipment to track power, equipment, and systems, for more accurate and efficient cost allocation across multiple plants and customers. More effective asset utilization, just for one compressed air unit, will save $35,000 a year. Additional savings are expected.

When French communications, media, and entertainment giant Thomson SA purchased RCA from American conglomerate General Electric, Thomson remained headquartered in Europe but operations continued at several RCA offices, including those in Indianapolis. Later, when these offices moved to a new facility north of the city, plans were made to rent the vacated space.

The old location, spread over more than 80 acres, has a central boiler plant providing chilled water, compressed air, heat, and domestic hot water to several buildings. Energy costs across multiple systems needed to be measured, optimized, and accurately allocated to various stakeholders on campus.

To get this data, Thomson-RCA implemented an AutoPilot Energy Information System designed by Holmes Energy, with Opto 22 hardware and software. Using analog and digital interfaces that connected Opto 22 I/O processors to field equipment via multiple I/O modules, the Autopilot system was able to monitor 108 I/O points. The monitored machinery and equipment included gas and electric meters, as well as chillers, cooling towers, boilers, and water heating equipment. The AutoPilot system also monitored the facility’s compressed air system—electrical demand and power consumption of two 500-hp Centac compressors and one 350-hp Worthington compressor, along with system pressure and airflow.

Data gathering

The system was initially intended to monitor only energy use and offer real-time screens detailing the status of each monitored point, individually and as a part of a group. But the system also provided human-machine interface (HMI) screens that offered data archiving and historical reports, as well as charts and graphs showing consumption and power demand in 15-minute intervals, along with monthly and annual totals.

As Thomson underwent internal restructuring, the company increased emphasis on utility cost reduction. Reports generated drew attention towards excessive energy use by the compressed air system and showed significant variation in efficiencies based on air demand and compressor. The most obvious differences seemed to occur when the Worthington (the smallest compressor) operated and during times of low demand.

Another somewhat startling discovery was the observation of a 30% variation in compressed air system efficiencies, from a low of 148 cubic feet per kilowatt to a high of 191 cf/kW.

Measure, analyze

To better determine differences among the three compressors, identify how many kilowatts each was consuming, explain variances in efficiency, and find optimum operating parameters for each under different conditions required, experimenting with different compressor combinations and loads.

In one such experiment, the first Centac compressor required 380 kW, the second Centac slightly under 350 kW, and the Worthington less than 250 kW. Based largely on this data (aggregated by the AutoPilot system), it became clear that running the Worthington alone on weekends offered the largest savings opportunity. In addition, Centac 2, thought to be identical to Centac 1, was more efficient under all conditions.

“Discoveries such as this—ones that offer tremendous revenue saving opportunities—are only made possible through the close examination that real-time monitoring provides,” says Bill Holmes, designer and integrator of the AutoPilot system. “But before one can even begin to consider how to cut costs, before any control can or should be exercised, and even before energy usage behavior can change, one needs to first closely observe and accurately measure.”

Demand cut, costs saved

 

Compressed Air System Performance, February

Using the data gathered from the system, boiler plant personnel began changing the operating sequence for the three compressors to maintain the highest system efficiency under all operating conditions. Controls were modified to allow the Worthington to run as the primary unit with the Centacs serving as automatic backups. Data (and some quick math) showed that with good compressor management, a demand reduction of approximately 175 kW could be achieved and the facility’s compressed air requirements could still be satisfied.

Implementation resulted in nearly 64,000 kWh savings per month. Air compressor electrical costs were reduced by 20%, leading to an annual cost savings in excess of $35,000.

Compressed Air System Performance, June

“In addition to tracking the power used in the buildings, we also began monitoring all of the individual equipment in the powerhouse and other facility systems,” says Thomson’s manager of maintenance, John Munchel. “With that information we were able to assign accurate dollar figures on what it cost to generate compressed air, chill water, and produce steam, and then accurately allocate costs between any departments or companies we would lease to.”


About the companies

www.opto22.com

Opto 22 develops and manufactures hardware and software for applications involving industrial automation and control, remote monitoring, and data acquisition.

www.holmesenergy.com

Holmes Energy is lead by Bill Holmes, PE, mechanical systems designer, and former professor of thermodynamics, power systems, and energy conservation at Purdue University. Clients include General Electric, DuPont, Honda, and GenCorp.

www.rca.com

RCA



No comments
The Top Plant program honors outstanding manufacturing facilities in North America. View the 2013 Top Plant.
The Product of the Year program recognizes products newly released in the manufacturing industries.
The Leaders Under 40 program features outstanding young people who are making a difference in manufacturing. View the 2013 Leaders here.
The new control room: It's got all the bells and whistles - and alarms, too; Remote maintenance; Specifying VFDs
2014 forecast issue: To serve and to manufacture - Veterans will bring skill and discipline to the plant floor if we can find a way to get them there.
2013 Top Plant: Lincoln Electric Company, Cleveland, Ohio
Case Study Database

Case Study Database

Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Plant Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.

These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.

Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.

Why manufacturers need to see energy in a different light: Current approaches to energy management yield quick savings, but leave plant managers searching for ways of improving on those early gains.
Electric motor power measurement and analysis: Understand the basics to drive greater efficiency; Selecting the right control chart; Linear position sensors gain acceptance
Protecting standby generators for mission critical facilities; Selecting energy-efficient transformers; Integrating power monitoring systems; Mitigating harmonics in electrical systems

Annual Salary Survey

Participate in the 2013 Salary Survey

In a year when manufacturing continued to lead the economic rebound, it makes sense that plant manager bonuses rebounded. Plant Engineering’s annual Salary Survey shows both wages and bonuses rose in 2012 after a retreat the year before.

Average salary across all job titles for plant floor management rose 3.5% to $95,446, and bonus compensation jumped to $15,162, a 4.2% increase from the 2010 level and double the 2011 total, which showed a sharp drop in bonus.

2012 Salary Survey Analysis

2012 Salary Survey Results

Maintenance and reliability tips and best practices from the maintenance and reliability coaches at Allied Reliability Group.
The One Voice for Manufacturing blog reports on federal public policy issues impacting the manufacturing sector. One Voice is a joint effort by the National Tooling and Machining...
The Society for Maintenance and Reliability Professionals an organization devoted...
Join this ongoing discussion of machine guarding topics, including solutions assessments, regulatory compliance, gap analysis...
IMS Research, recently acquired by IHS Inc., is a leading independent supplier of market research and consultancy to the global electronics industry.
Maintenance is not optional in manufacturing. It’s a profit center, driving productivity and uptime while reducing overall repair costs.
The Lachance on CMMS blog is about current maintenance topics. Blogger Paul Lachance is president and chief technology officer for Smartware Group.