Go Beyond Motors to Reduce Energy Use

With energy costs impacting every business, and growing concerns about how burning fossil fuels is affecting the world’s climate, companies of all sizes are exploring ways to make their operations more energy efficient. The use of high-efficiency motors would appear to be a logical solution. But motor efficiency does not always equal energy savings.

07/01/2009


Sidebars:
IBM forms Green Sigma Coalition
Regulatory compliance papers
RSTechED focuses on sustainability

With energy costs impacting every business, and growing concerns about how burning fossil fuels is affecting the world’s climate, companies of all sizes are exploring ways to make their operations more energy efficient. The use of high-efficiency motors would appear to be a logical solution. But motor efficiency does not always equal energy savings.

The true potential for saving energy involves a much bigger story, one that requires taking into account the entire power train. That’s because an energy efficient motor can reduce energy use by only 10%, even under optimum operating conditions. Far more important in saving significant amounts of energy are the use of electronic speed controls, which can reduce energy use by 30%, and optimizing mechanical systems, which can reduce energy use 60%.

Understanding energy loss

Energy is defined as the work stored in a system or a system’s ability to do work. If any of the electrical energy that flows through a system is not actually applied in doing work, then it is wasted. In other words: the more efficient a system is, the less energy is lost.

To calculate how much energy is being lost through system inefficiencies, engineers use the following formula to determine the amount of power (P) introduced into a system compared to the energy output: P in – P out = P loss

So how is energy lost? A typical power train consists of a motor, drive, gearing, and wiring. Energy can be lost from each component. In an asynchronous motor, for example, there are friction, magnetization and ohmic (resistance) losses. Both the design of a motor and the quality of materials used to construct it can contribute to energy losses.

Since each component can contribute to energy loss, let’s consider each one individually.

The low-hanging fruit for energy saving may be mechanical, not electrical.

The low-hanging fruit for energy saving may be mechanical, not electrical.

Motors —Major sources of energy loss in motors result from friction in the bearings and seals, wind resistance of the motor fan, iron losses in the forms of hysteresis and eddy currents (based on the quality of sheet metal used to construct the stator and rotor laminations), copper losses (I2R losses), and harmonics.

Improving the energy efficiency of motors can be achieved by using better materials with lower resistance, such as rotor cages of copper instead of aluminum. Motor efficiency can also be improved by increasing the size of the active components of the motor. This is why premium-efficiency motors have higher inertia rotors. But be careful here— while it may be tempting to use motors with higher horsepower ratings than your application calls for simply because their nameplate efficiency is higher, that efficiency is based on full-load operation.

A 10 HP motor may be listed as being more efficient than a 5 HP motor, but it will use a lot more current. And a partially loaded motor is terribly inefficient. A good rule of thumb is to operate motors in the 80% to 90% utilization range for optimal efficiency. The use of VFDs (variable frequency drives) allows you to slow the motor down to keep the utilization at its optimum.

Wiring —Electric cables produce both ohmic and capacitive (energy storage) losses. Ohmic losses in the conductors are inversely proportional to the diameter but are proportional to the length. With standard designs, total power losses on the cable can amount to as much as 5% of the transferred power. Shorter cables with larger diameter conductors minimize energy losses.

Gearing —Losses in gearing are due primarily to friction caused by movement between the teeth. Worm gears, for example, are the least efficient type of gearing because they experience a great deal of sliding and therefore generate significant friction.

Lack of sufficient lubrication is another source of friction and resulting energy loss. Incorrect mounting positions, temperature, and immersion depths are the key factors here. The flow of the oil is determined by its temperature and viscosity. The thicker the oil, the more torque is required to move the gear. The higher the oil temperature, the thinner the medium will be and the lower the power loss. The design of the housing also determines the arrangement of components, and therefore the oil flow.

Bearings and oil seals also have a part to play in energy-efficient operation. Gear unit efficiency is influenced by the seal between the motor and gear unit as well as by losses in the gear unit. The higher the input speed, the higher the losses in the bearings and churning losses in the oil.

Inverters —While inverters or variable speed drives are often added to a power train to reduce energy consumption, they also consume electricity in operation. A drive’s contribution to energy savings lies in its ability to allow you to manage motor operations to reduce output power. Managing motor speeds, ramps, and available torque translates directly into managing power consumption.

Improve system efficiency

In designing for energy efficiency, it is critical to take a holistic view of the system or process. When several machines or components work in series as a system, then their individual efficiency ratings must be multiplied to arrive at the overall efficiency rating.

For example, while a premium-efficiency motor has an efficiency rating of roughly 95%, the efficiency of a worm gear is between 50% and 80%, depending on the make and model. Using a premium-efficiency motor with worm gearing would therefore be counterproductive, since the system’s overall efficiency rating would be closer to the gearing than that of the motor.

An understanding of the application is equally important in component selection. High-efficiency motors are designed to reduce power consumption in continuously running operations, such as fans or pumps. Therefore, they usually have heavier rotors than standard motors, which enable them to take advantage of inertia once they are started. But in applications where motors run intermittently, with frequent starts and stops, the heavier (often larger diameter), high inertia rotors can become real energy burners, as it requires more energy to start these high-efficiency motors.

Now think about the equipment at your site, such as sorters, pushers, indexers that are typically found in airports and parcel handling systems. Or applications such as conveyors in automotive plants, out-feed conveyors on packaging machines, or large packaging machines like palletizers and pallet wrappers. Motors powering high-cycling applications like these may only run at full speed for a few seconds, but they are in start-up mode much of their lives. For these applications, motors with lower inertia rotors will use much less energy.

High-efficiency motors are designed to deliver their best performance under specific operating conditions. Using a high-efficiency design outside of its ideal applications can result in worse energy performance than a conventional motor. Make sure you understand those characteristics before choosing.

High-efficiency motors are designed to deliver their best performance under specific operating conditions. Using a high-efficiency design outside of its ideal applications can result in worse energy performance than a conventional motor. Make sure you understand those characteristics before choosing.

Application-oriented engineering

Different applications require different engineering solutions to reduce power losses and consumption. The following examples represent just two approaches to saving energy.

Conveyors —Many conveyor systems, like those used in automotive assembly, packaging or baggage handling are powered by a combination of components that include a NEMA-frame motor, an external clutch brake, reducer, V-belt, and pulleys. The high inertial factors involved in this design approach and the repeated shaking of the equipment every time the clutch is engaged place a severe strain on components. Reducers and clutch brakes must be replaced frequently, resulting in downtime and energy consumption rates that are unacceptable.

While a single start/stop cycle might use only a fraction of a second of energy, some of these applications may involve thousands of cycles per hour. When compounded monthly or yearly, the impact on energy usage and heat damage to components is significant.

A more efficient alternative to this cumbersome drive train design is an IEC-type gearmotor with an integral brake, a shaft-mounted helical bevel gear reducer and a VFD. This streamlined system reduces maintenance, parts and energy usage, while equipment uptime is increased.

Storage and retrieval —In a vertical storage and retrieval system, like those used in a manufacturing plant to manage parts inventory, one drive handles the travel axis and another controls the hoist axis. Since energy is proportional to mass x height, items stored in the rack have associated potential energy. This energy is released when the load is lowered.

Also consider the kinetic energy in the motion of the horizontal carrier. What happens to this energy when this high-inertia horizontal load is decelerated? With conventional control, the released energy of both axes is dissipated using braking resistors, resulting in significant power loss. A more energy-efficient solution is to tightly coordinate the timing of the motions of the two drives using a programmable controller. This allows the regenerative energy produced during the braking operation of one drive to be diverted to power the motion operation of the second drive.

By taking advantage of this regenerative power sharing, total energy consumption falls dramatically, in the range of 25% to 40% depending on the system, without reducing system dynamics or cycle time.

Focus factors for efficiency

Designing for energy savings requires reducing both power losses and power consumption.

Following are the five key factors to focus on to reduce power losses:

  • Increase gear unit efficiency;

  • Increase motor efficiency;

  • Eliminate unnecessary functions;

  • Use/recycle released energy by direct utilization, regeneration of braking energy and energy storage; and

  • Size components according to demand.

In addition to reducing power loss, engineers should also focus on reducing power consumption to address both portion of the power loss equation. Here are the four critical power consumption factors:

  • Reduce/control output speeds;

  • Reduce load torque through rigid transmission components, counterweights and minimizing friction;

  • Use of energy-saving modes; and

  • Turn the device off.

The bottom line is that there is no single solution for saving energy when it comes to motorized systems. Each component of the drive train offers opportunities to improve efficiency and reduce power losses. These opportunities vary by application, as does the engineering solution required. Being energy smart will require rethinking old assumptions and practices. Above all, it will mean engineering for energy savings in every system, every machine, and every process.


Author Information

Rich Mintz is head of product marketing for SEW-Eurodrive. He can be reached at rmintz@seweurodrive.com .


IBM forms Green Sigma Coalition

Creating a unique arrangement with its metering, monitoring, data communications, and automation partners, IBM rallies its technology resources to to provide smart solutions for energy, water, waste, and greenhouse gas management. budurl.com/tnun

Regulatory compliance papers

Aimed at the manufacturing industries and its suppliers, a series of white papers from the Telecommunications Industry Association address regulatory compliance issues such as RoHS, WEEE, REACH, and EuP directives.

budurl.com/jufk

RSTechED focuses on sustainability

From predictive modeling based on a multitude of factors to driving business data down to the plant floor, Rockwell Software’s direction is clearly centered on sustainable energy and production efficiencies. budurl.com/5fn5



No comments
The Top Plant program honors outstanding manufacturing facilities in North America. View the 2013 Top Plant.
The Product of the Year program recognizes products newly released in the manufacturing industries.
The Leaders Under 40 program features outstanding young people who are making a difference in manufacturing. View the 2013 Leaders here.
The new control room: It's got all the bells and whistles - and alarms, too; Remote maintenance; Specifying VFDs
2014 forecast issue: To serve and to manufacture - Veterans will bring skill and discipline to the plant floor if we can find a way to get them there.
2013 Top Plant: Lincoln Electric Company, Cleveland, Ohio
Case Study Database

Case Study Database

Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Plant Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.

These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.

Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.

Why manufacturers need to see energy in a different light: Current approaches to energy management yield quick savings, but leave plant managers searching for ways of improving on those early gains.
Electric motor power measurement and analysis: Understand the basics to drive greater efficiency; Selecting the right control chart; Linear position sensors gain acceptance
Protecting standby generators for mission critical facilities; Selecting energy-efficient transformers; Integrating power monitoring systems; Mitigating harmonics in electrical systems

Annual Salary Survey

Participate in the 2013 Salary Survey

In a year when manufacturing continued to lead the economic rebound, it makes sense that plant manager bonuses rebounded. Plant Engineering’s annual Salary Survey shows both wages and bonuses rose in 2012 after a retreat the year before.

Average salary across all job titles for plant floor management rose 3.5% to $95,446, and bonus compensation jumped to $15,162, a 4.2% increase from the 2010 level and double the 2011 total, which showed a sharp drop in bonus.

2012 Salary Survey Analysis

2012 Salary Survey Results

Maintenance and reliability tips and best practices from the maintenance and reliability coaches at Allied Reliability Group.
The One Voice for Manufacturing blog reports on federal public policy issues impacting the manufacturing sector. One Voice is a joint effort by the National Tooling and Machining...
The Society for Maintenance and Reliability Professionals an organization devoted...
Join this ongoing discussion of machine guarding topics, including solutions assessments, regulatory compliance, gap analysis...
IMS Research, recently acquired by IHS Inc., is a leading independent supplier of market research and consultancy to the global electronics industry.
Maintenance is not optional in manufacturing. It’s a profit center, driving productivity and uptime while reducing overall repair costs.
The Lachance on CMMS blog is about current maintenance topics. Blogger Paul Lachance is president and chief technology officer for Smartware Group.