Generator ratings and the implications for data centers

Understanding how generator ratings are determined is quite simple, but there is a long list of variables to consider. This reviews the fundamentals of generator ratings and a recent industry discussion about specific ratings for generators in data centers.

03/30/2014


Learning Objectives:

  • Differentiate power generator ratings in data center applications.
  • Understand power generator components.
  • Consider impact of new emissions standards on generator ratings.

Figure 1: This graph shows the relationship between the load level and engine life relative to the rating. The highest rating for a generator with a given engine and alternator combination is the standby rating; the lowest is the continuous rating. Courtesy: Kohler Power SystemsRecently, some generator manufacturers have created ratings specifically for products they supply to the data center market. This is in direct response to the technical white paper, “Data Center Site Infrastructure Tier Standard: Topology,” published by the data center organization Uptime Institute LLC. The paper states that for Tier III (99.982% reliability) and Tier IV (99.995% reliability) designs of data centers, the generator, not the utility, is to be treated as the primary source of power. It is important to note that the references to Tier III and Tier IV designations have nothing to do with EPA Tier 3 and Tier 4 emissions requirements for engines (which we’ll discuss later)—an unfortunate coincidence in designation that has led to a good deal of misunderstanding in the industry.

The Uptime Institute’s paper specifies that the generator must be “capable of supporting the site load on a continuous basis” and refers to ISO 8528-1 (International Standard for Reciprocating Internal Combustion Engine-Driven Alternating Current Generating Sets), in which four generator ratings are defined: standby, prime, limited running time, and continuous.

As a result, data center designers have specified generators with a “continuous” rating based on the peak demand of the site, which in turn has led to the installation of oversized generators that add unnecessary cost to the data-center design. Some generator manufacturers are even promoting and specifying a “continuous” rating for data center use on their generators to sell larger models and boost sales. We believe that oversizing of generators in the data center industry adds unnecessary cost and diminishes efficiency. When you consider the actual run time of these generators, oversizing does not provide value to the customer or improve reliability of the system.

Specifying a generator rating

Here’s why specifying a continuous rating (as the Uptime Institute recommends) for generators in the data center industry is unnecessary. First, consider that the main purpose of the ISO 8528-1 ratings standard is to classify the type of application for which a generator rating is to be used. In nearly every case, data centers are standby (emergency) applications. The generator is not the primary power source; it is used to back up a reliable utility, or in the case of Tier III and Tier IV data centers, multiple independent utilities. The only exceptions are areas where there are no utilities, and the generator is used as prime power.

Figure 1 shows the relationship between the load level and engine life relative to the rating. The highest rating for a generator with a given engine and alternator combination is the standby rating; the lowest is the continuous rating. This relationship is the same for all engines (and generators). Although the slope of the line may differ from generator to generator, the relationship of these ratings remains the same. The more hours you plan to run the generator at a given load, the lower the rating needs to be to maintain the same level of reliability.

When choosing the generator rating, you need to know how many hours per year you expect the generator to be used and what the load profile looks like. As stated above, the majority of data centers are stationary emergency (standby) applications; generator run time is low when backing up a utility. So even though the Uptime Institute specifies that the generator should be the primary power source for Tier III and Tier IV data centers, we know this is not the reality.

Figure 2: Data centers have a varying load profile and should follow a standby rating load profile, shown here. Courtesy: Kohler Power SystemsAnother important factor to consider is the load profile over time. Figure 2 shows a standby application profile that has a varying load over time. Data centers have a varying load profile. In its white paper, the Uptime Institute provides generator rating definitions referenced to ISO 8528-1, which include a continuous rating. This does not consider the rest of the definition in ISO 8528-1, which states that the load is also nonvarying. Figure 3 shows a continuous-rating load profile. Continuous ratings are intended for peak shaving programs where a designated block of power is sold back to the utility or used on-site, but are not intended for applications where the load varies. A data center’s load profile is always variable, which fits the standby rating definition in ISO 8528-1.

Consider a worst-case scenario. In 2005, Hurricane Katrina created an extremely long utility outage. According to the Energy Information Association, it took 30 days to resolve 90% of the utility outages after the hurricane. When you consider that a month of continuous generator run time equals 720 hours and that the engines and alternators used in Kohler generators for large data center applications, for example, are designed for tens of thousands of hours, a clearer picture starts to emerge. The fact is that standby-rated generators can run an unlimited number of hours with varying load during the utility outage. (Unlimited hours are subject to the manufacturer’s recommended maintenance intervals.)

Another point to remember is that the main causes of a generator’s failure to start or to operate during an outage are not due to engine life, but to fuel contamination, low or dead starting batteries, or a poorly run maintenance program that did not follow the manufacturer’s recommendations.

Some generator manufacturers offer multiple standby ratings definitions that vary based on the average load factor and number of hours run. ISO 8528-1 states that the average power output shall not exceed 70% power in a 24-hour period, unless the engine manufacturer agrees to a level higher than 70%. The engines in some generators allow for an 85% average power level for large data center applications. Thinking back to Figure 1, this is a true statement of an engine’s durability. The generator can be specified using the manufacturer’s generator-sizing program; all that is required is to enter the planned site load profile.

Given all of the above, our recommendation is that data center designers fully consider the actual requirements of the generator during an outage. Specifying the correct size generator at the start and then following a structured maintenance and testing program will prove the most sensible course of action.


<< First < Previous 1 2 Next > Last >>

Anonymous , 04/09/14 03:08 PM:

I know a manufacture who recommended 1500 hours at standby.
Anonymous , 02/10/16 10:03 AM:

We have even considered the highest available rating for a generator i.e. Standby Rating as the main rating for a data centre design using large number of 2.5 MVA generators. We were sure that utility failures in future are likely to be not more than few hours in a year based on last 30 years of statistics. If we had gone by the continuous rating as per ISO, the rating would have been close to 3.5 MVA resulting huge additional dead investment which would have never been put to use.
The Top Plant program honors outstanding manufacturing facilities in North America. View the 2015 Top Plant.
The Product of the Year program recognizes products newly released in the manufacturing industries.
The Engineering Leaders Under 40 program identifies and gives recognition to young engineers who...
Strategic outsourcing delivers efficiency; Sleeve bearing clearance; Causes of water hammer; Improve air quality; Maintenance safety; GAMS preview
World-class maintenance: The three keys to success - Deploy people, process and technology; 2016 Lubrication Guide; Why hydraulic systems get hot
Your leaks start here: Take a disciplined approach with your hydraulic system; U.S. presence at Hannover Messe a rousing success
Flexible offshore fire protection; Big Data's impact on operations; Bridging the skills gap; Identifying security risks
The digital oilfield: Utilizing Big Data can yield big savings; Virtualization a real solution; Tracking SIS performance
Getting to the bottom of subsea repairs: Older pipelines need more attention, and operators need a repair strategy; OTC preview; Offshore production difficult - and crucial
Applying network redundancy; Overcoming loop tuning challenges; PID control and networks
Putting COPS into context; Designing medium-voltage electrical systems; Planning and designing resilient, efficient data centers; The nine steps of designing generator fuel systems
Package boilers; Natural gas infrared heating; Thermal treasure; Standby generation; Natural gas supports green efforts

Annual Salary Survey

Before the calendar turned, 2016 already had the makings of a pivotal year for manufacturing, and for the world.

There were the big events for the year, including the United States as Partner Country at Hannover Messe in April and the 2016 International Manufacturing Technology Show in Chicago in September. There's also the matter of the U.S. presidential elections in November, which promise to shape policy in manufacturing for years to come.

But the year started with global economic turmoil, as a slowdown in Chinese manufacturing triggered a worldwide stock hiccup that sent values plummeting. The continued plunge in world oil prices has resulted in a slowdown in exploration and, by extension, the manufacture of exploration equipment.

Read more: 2015 Salary Survey

Maintenance and reliability tips and best practices from the maintenance and reliability coaches at Allied Reliability Group.
The One Voice for Manufacturing blog reports on federal public policy issues impacting the manufacturing sector. One Voice is a joint effort by the National Tooling and Machining...
The Society for Maintenance and Reliability Professionals an organization devoted...
Join this ongoing discussion of machine guarding topics, including solutions assessments, regulatory compliance, gap analysis...
IMS Research, recently acquired by IHS Inc., is a leading independent supplier of market research and consultancy to the global electronics industry.
Maintenance is not optional in manufacturing. It’s a profit center, driving productivity and uptime while reducing overall repair costs.
The Lachance on CMMS blog is about current maintenance topics. Blogger Paul Lachance is president and chief technology officer for Smartware Group.
This article collection contains several articles on the vital role that compressed air plays in manufacturing plants.
This article collection contains several articles on the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) and how it is transforming manufacturing.
This article collection contains several articles on strategic maintenance and understanding all the parts of your plant.
click me