Functional Safety - A New "Mark" From UL
UL offers functional safety certification.
J.B. Titus
UL has added functional safety certification services. Automation suppliers, systems integrators, engineering firms, OEM’s, end-user’s, etc. all have something in common. Their management and design engineers now have a choice regarding the direction they take to obtain safety certifications for hardware and software based products intended for safety applications. One of the market leaders offering these services for the past several years has been the TUV organization. Since around 2002 TUV has been building a U.S. presence with very strong roots in Europe.
UL has historically been one of the market leaders in the U.S. for product certifications as required by various standards, requirements, and/or regulations. However, until recently, UL was not offering services to review, analyze, and certify hardware and software based products for safeguarding applications per the standards, requirements, and/or regulations. Check out the following link at UL’s web site for additional information if this is of interest to you:
www.ul.com/global/eng/pages/offerings/industries/powerandcontrols/functional/
This new service from UL, in my opinion, is both needed and confusing. It’s needed because competition is always good in a free market system because it will help drive quality improvements in the services as well reductions in time lines and the costs for these services. On the other hand, some suppliers and end users have already approached me for advice regarding what this means to them? They ask:
- Do I have to get safety certification marks from both TUV and UL?
- Is one of the two marks more important?
- If there’s an “incident” on my machine, will one mark be sufficient in arbitration?
- How do I determine which mark for my product?
- As an international supplier of safety products, do I need to invest in both marks for a given product?
In my opinion, we need to start a discussion on this subject to gather comments from across industry. Anything new always causes a stir in the market so let’s see if we can build a US “competitive advantage” around this one!
INTEGRATED SAFETY COULD BE YOUR OPPORTUNITY – CONSIDER IT!
As a side note – The 2011 updated NFPA 79, Electrical Standard for Industrial Machinery, was previously expected for release this month. The schedule was recently modified and the current expected release date is June, 2011.
Submit your ideas, experiences, and challenges on this subject in the comments section below. Click on the following text if you don't see a comments box, then scroll down: Functional Safety – A New “Mark” From UL
Related articles:
Contact: www.jbtitus.com for “Solutions for Machine Safety”.
Case Study Database
Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Plant Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.
These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.
Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.
2012 Salary Survey
In a year when manufacturing continued to lead the economic rebound, it makes sense that plant manager bonuses rebounded. Plant Engineering’s annual Salary Survey shows both wages and bonuses rose in 2012 after a retreat the year before.
Average salary across all job titles for plant floor management rose 3.5% to $95,446, and bonus compensation jumped to $15,162, a 4.2% increase from the 2010 level and double the 2011 total, which showed a sharp drop in bonus.