SEARCH Archives
Loading
Sponsored by:

Follow precedence when demoting an employee

Machine Repairman Grade II Ed Crowley was hired in June by Maintenance Supervisor Jack Andrews.

By Raymond Dreyfack

03/01/1998


Machine Repairman Grade II Ed Crowley was hired in June by Maintenance Supervisor Jack Andrews. Although his performance was marginal at best, he survived his 30-day probationary period only because the department was in a state of disruption, and Andrews was too busy or confused to monitor his work.

Crowley's performance continued to be marginal or worse. About 4 mo after his date of hire, Andrews resigned and was replaced by a new supervisor, Bill Shapper. Shapper was a good man, but it took him 2 mo or more to learn his job and become familiar with its requirements. At this point, he began to reorganize the maintenance department.

It was thus more than 6 mo before Shapper got around to reviewing Crowley's job sheets and performance.

He confided to his assistant, "This guy never should have been kept beyond his probationary period."

"I know, but that wasn't my decision to make."

"What to do with him now is the decision to make."

Shapper summoned Crowley to his desk and reviewed his performance record with him. Crowley had no comment to make.

"Ed, I'm sorry I have to do this, but I'm moving you a step down to Mechanic Grade II," Shapper said.

Crowley scowled. He knew this move entailed a lower wage rate and lower level work.

Crowley protested, "That's in violation of the labor agreement. The Manual states that prior to terminating or demoting an employee, remedial measures must be applied to improve his performance. I was never put into a training program or anything."

Shapper discussed Crowley's response with his assistant, who felt the employee might have a point. "The Manual does call for a Corrective Action Plan."

"The policy makes sense," Shapper said. "But it would be hopeless in Crowley's case. No way could his performance be improved. It would be a waste of money and time."

He put through the demotion notice. Crowley promptly responded by grieving.

Question : How do you rate Shapper's chance of making the demotion stick?

Plant engineer's decision: When Plant Engineer Carl Barcley was apprised of the details, he advised Shapper to rescind the demotion and enroll Crowley in a training program, with his future job classification dependent on the outcome.

"When procedures are preestablished for dealing with substandard performance, whether an employee is judged hopeless or not, you have no choice but to follow them."





No comments
The Top Plant program honors outstanding manufacturing facilities in North America. The 2012 Top Plant winners have been named.
In 2012, Plant Engineering's Product of the Year program will celebrated its 25th anniversary. Read about the 2012 winners and nominate for 2013.
The Leaders Under 40 program features outstanding young people who are making a difference in manufacturing. View the 2012 Leaders here.
Find the fake! Counterfeit electrical equipment a clear and present danger
Investment in excellence: One plant's improved productivity and quality was repaid when their company expanded the facility
Strategic uptime, Increased capacity goes right to the bottom line
Case Study Database

Case Study Database

Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Plant Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.

These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.

Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.

Alarm management tips, Power management, Building automation
Estimating data center PUE, Design tips for cost savings, Networked controls, NFPA 70E
Attacking Energy Costs: Strategies for showing financial return on energy management investments

2012 Salary Survey

In a year when manufacturing continued to lead the economic rebound, it makes sense that plant manager bonuses rebounded. Plant Engineering’s annual Salary Survey shows both wages and bonuses rose in 2012 after a retreat the year before.

Average salary across all job titles for plant floor management rose 3.5% to $95,446, and bonus compensation jumped to $15,162, a 4.2% increase from the 2010 level and double the 2011 total, which showed a sharp drop in bonus.

2012 Salary Survey Analysis

2012 Salary Survey Results


Poll of the Week

What category most helps you select new products?
Recommendation from colleagues
Product of the Year winners
Supplier information
Trade show visit


Click Here for Poll Archives
Sponsored by:

About Us | Contact Us | Advertise | Subscribe to Magazine | Site Map | Privacy Policy
Home | Channels | New Products | Media Library | Connect | Industry News | Events and Awards | Newsletters | Blogs | Magazine
Control Engineering | Plant Engineering | Consulting-Specifying Engineer
All content copyright © 2010-2013 CFE Media. All rights reserved.