Feedback, KPIs in the FDA’s total product lifecycle help manufacturing efficiency
U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is using total product lifecycle (TPLC) to show how feedback and key performance indicators (KPIs) can make manufacturing more efficient.
Knowledge acquired in the development, manufacture, and use of one generation of product can be applied to future generations that a company plans to market. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is using total product lifecycle (TPLC) to show how feedback and key performance indicators (KPIs) can make manufacturing more efficient, resulting in
Also read from Axendia, FDA-related white papers:
Providing a feedback loop between shop floor data and the design of the next generation product is indispensible in TPLC. Incorporating strategies such as robust design and designing for manufacturability enable product designers to take into consideration process capabilities. This could have a significant impact in increasing product quality while reducing manufacturing costs.
Build in quality
FDA also has been very proactive is in communicating its support for an industry-wide shift towards a focus on control theory and away from testing to document quality.
The agency defines the “desired state” as follows:
Product quality and performance achieved and assured by design of effective and efficient manufacturing processes;
Product specifications based on mechanistic understanding of how formulation and process factors impact product performance; and
Ability to effect continuous improvement and continuous “real time” assurance of quality.
To meet FDA’s stated “desired state,” manufacturers must attain real-time visibility into their processes to separate the wheat from the chaff. This requires deep knowledge of critical-to-quality variables and KPIs.
To move towards operational excellence, device manufacturers must identify “golden” (optimal) and “lead” (first) units, lots or batches and analyze key parameters that produced them. They must also compare and contrast such batches to identify parameters that are inconsequential to product quality. This approach can provide a deep understanding of the process to enable the development of KPIs to reduce variability, increase yields, and lower costs.
Also see April Control Engineering , "
Daniel R. Matlis is president of Axendia, a life-sciences and healthcare consulting and strategic advisory firm. www.axendia.com
- Edited by Mark T. Hoske , editor in chief
Control Engineering System Integration eNewsletter
Register here to select your choice of free eNewsletters .
Annual Salary Survey
After almost a decade of uncertainty, the confidence of plant floor managers is soaring. Even with a number of challenges and while implementing new technologies, there is a renewed sense of optimism among plant managers about their business and their future.
The respondents to the 2014 Plant Engineering Salary Survey come from throughout the U.S. and serve a variety of industries, but they are uniform in their optimism about manufacturing. This year’s survey found 79% consider manufacturing a secure career. That’s up from 75% in 2013 and significantly higher than the 63% figure when Plant Engineering first started asking that question a decade ago.