Faster tripping: Speed lowers energy, boosts arc-flash safety at Shell refinery
Vaasa, Finland -- Shell Canada is realizing improved operator safety at its Sarnia-based petrochemical refinery with an electrical arc protection system. The Vamp Ltd. system uses light and current sensing and protects the continuous-processing plant against costly nuisance trips.
Vaasa, Finland -- Shell Canada is realizing improved operator safety at its Sarnia-based petrochemical refinery with an electrical arc protection system. The Vamp Ltd.
Vamp Ltd.system uses light and current sensing and protects the continuous-processing plant against costly nuisance trips.
The upgrade, prompted by recent refurbishments, involved the increase in capacity of overhead electricity lines that feed the refinery, potentially taking the incident energy level at the air-insulated switchgear substation to more than 100 calories per square centimeter. Such a level would demand use of cumbersome personal protective equipment (PPE) and is above levels prescribed by Shell’s electrical safety policies in the area.
Shell Canada follows the NFPA 70E standard and, wherever possible, avoids live work on equipment with incident energy levels above 40 calories; live work is prohibited on equipment with energy levels beyond 100 calories. If levels are between 40 and 100 calories, then equipment should be scheduled for service during plant shutdowns. If not, live work can only be sanctioned following detailed hazard analysis that account for equipment age, maintenance history, access, and ability to perform required tasks wearing 100 calorie PPE.
The company sought a solution to optimize operator safety and minimize nuisance trips because the plant operates continuously, protected by a fail-safe, emergency shutdown system. Nuisance trips can result in financial loss, as they can initiate a sequence of controlled shutdowns that halt production, necessitating time-consuming controlled start-up.
Use of specialized arc light sensing technology meant that the system would trip within 7 milliseconds, providing faster, more efficient protection than stand-alone over-current relays or busbar differential devices, and reducing incident energy levels. Current sensing capability enabled safeguarding against nuisance trips that any single-sensing system might experience.
The system can be programmed to sense electric arc conditions using simultaneous light and current data, or light sensor information only, and operates less than a quarter of the time of traditional alternative technologies.
"The Vamp system has given us a simple add-on for the switchgear at this plant that minimizes risk in the event of an arc flash, while also positively contributing to plant reliability", said Phil Lasek, electrical reliability specialist at Shell Canada. "The system's modularity also gives me welcome flexibility for future expansion and improvements."
Lasek verified the system before installation with the aid of a high-voltage engineering consultant. The engineers could not verify the tripping speed to the finest accuracy, as they had no practical way of generating a true arc flash and fault simultaneously. But they devised a triggered flash bulb system and simulated fault current arrangement that could measure the response speed with a resolution that proved incident energy will not exceed 35 calories/cm2. Lasek believes that actual incident energy level would be considerably less, but to ensure operator safety he nevertheless protects the staff for the 35 level — using the next grade higher PPE equipment, rated to 42 calories. The multi-zone capability of Vamp 221
multi-zone capability of Vamp 221minimizes ongoing costs, and Lasek recently extended the system to protect a secondary busbar in facility substations.
For related reading, see:
Case Study Database
Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Plant Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.
These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.
Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.
Annual Salary Survey
In a year when manufacturing continued to lead the economic rebound, it makes sense that plant manager bonuses rebounded. Plant Engineering’s annual Salary Survey shows both wages and bonuses rose in 2012 after a retreat the year before.
Average salary across all job titles for plant floor management rose 3.5% to $95,446, and bonus compensation jumped to $15,162, a 4.2% increase from the 2010 level and double the 2011 total, which showed a sharp drop in bonus.