Exploring robotics for the factory of the future

Control Engineering Europe’s Suzanne Gill reports on a European Commission co-funded project that is testing the idea that industrial robot technology could provide a good base for machining, being both flexible and cost-efficient. Researchers are engineering robots to perform CNC operations.


The European Commission is co-funding an €8 million project as part of the European Economic Recovery Plan (EERP) adopted in 2008, which targets the use of industrial robots for high-end machining for cost-effective, flexible, and reliable manufacturing solutions for the “Factory of the Future.”

COMET project test execution: machining of the aluminum workpiece for a different robot configuration (DOE ½ Factorial Plan, 6 factors, 2 levels). Courtesy: COMET

The inaugural meeting of the European project was hosted in Spain in September 2010 by the coordinating partner of the project, Delcam. The COMET project sees 14 companies from industry, research institutes, and universities sharing and combining their manufacturing expertise with the aim of developing plug-and-produce COmponents and METhods for adaptive control of industrial robots for high-end machining to enable cost-effective, flexible, and reliable manufacturing solutions.

Mark Gadsden, product marketing manager at Delcam, explained more about the aims of the project: “The 30-month COMET project aims to overcome the challenges facing European manufacturing industries by developing innovative machining systems that are flexible, reliable, and predictable with an average of 30% cost-efficiency savings in comparison to machine tools.”

Because it is both flexible and cost-efficient, industrial robot technology could, from a conceptual point of view, provide a good base for machining. However, in real-life situations industrial robots have three critical limitations: a lack of absolute positioning accuracy, an inability to reject disturbances in terms of process forces, and a lack of reliable programming and simulation tools to ensure right-first-time machining when production commences. At the present time these limitations are preventing the use of robots in typical machining applications.

Four elements

The COMET project consists of four elements that, together, aim to overcome these limitations. These include:

1. A methodology for describing kinematic and dynamic models of industrial robots (KDMIR) to define accurately the static and dynamic behavior of any industrial robot, which then is represented by its unique signature.

2. An integrated programming and simulation environment for adaptive robot path generation for machining with industrial robots (PSIR), based upon the unique signatures.

3. An adaptive tracking system for industrial robots (ATIR) to detect deviations from the programmed robot path and to adaptively initiate real-time corrections via the robot controller to ensure the necessary machining accuracy.

4. A high dynamics compensation mechanism (HDCM) to accomplish an absolute accuracy better than 50 μm; significantly “beyond” the structural capability of the robot system on its own.

Noble aims indeed, but the project has some interesting challenges to overcome, as COMET partner TEKS points out. Robots are a compromise between a comparatively low dynamic accuracy, and unrivalled handling flexibility. This means that, while robots are very agile, this agility results in a reduced stiffness compared to conventional machine tools.

The TEKS robot cell is based at the Advanced Manufacturing Park (AMP) in Rotherham. The company, which has already co-hosted one of the regular general assembly meetings of the project, was the first with an operational cell to begin undertaking trials for COMET.

TEKS is in the process of developing its robotic cell and with consortium partner, Artis of Germany, it has conducted force measurement tests while machining aluminium. The forces generated by the cutting operation have been recorded in detail with an Artis prototype data acquisition solution, at a high sampling rate of 500 kHz.

Roland Krain, research and development manager at TEKS, explained the potential benefits of this approach: “Traditionally robots are used as handling solutions for assembly. If machining is required in a robotic line or cell, the robot typically would place the part in a conventional machine tool. Such tools range from the high tens of thousands pounds to several hundred thousand pounds. A robotic machining cell could provide a cost-effective machining solution. A secondhand robot can, typically, be purchased for £15k, along with a good quality high-speed spindle for £20k, giving the end user multi-axis machining capability for a fraction of the cost of a comparable conventional machine tool. Obviously the secondhand robot has to be in ‘as new’ condition, be well maintained, and have a compatible controller; otherwise, the accuracy required might not be achieved.”

“Today, customers generally opt for either a 5-axis machine or a handling robot. If we could bring the two things together, we would be able to make customers more productive and more competitive,” concludes Krain.

Setting up cells

Robot cells have now also been set up at a variety of partner facilities using robots from manufacturers such as Kuka, ABB, Motoman, and Comau. The cells will enable industrial tests to be performed on a range of parts, ensuring that all developments take into consideration the acceptability to end users in terms of time, cost, and reliability. Commenting on the COMET project to date, Dr. Ir. Jan Ramboer, research programme officer from the European Commission, said: “The COMET project is an ambitious and innovative project. I am pleased to see robots being used early on to perform physical tests which are relevant to applications in the European manufacturing industry. Everything is very clear and there is an excellent synergy between partners. Dissemination is good across all levels, in particular the use of social media for communicating the project objectives and developments.”

COMET project YouTube videos include these and several more, showing how robotics and machining combine. www.youtube.com/user/COMETproject  Courtesy: COMET, YouTube

Over the next six months almost all the technical tasks in the project will be active. To enable partners to plan and conduct robot machining experiments, a prototype of the high dynamics compensation mechanism (HDCM) will be available. The HDCM will help to accomplish an absolute accuracy better than 50μm—significantly beyond the structural capability of the robot system on its own. The integration of models together with the PSIR, ATIR, and HDCM will ensure that tests are performed in realistic end-user environments.

Jan Willem Gunnink from Delcam, coordinator of the project, said: “I have complete confidence that European manufacturing organizations will benefit from the combined knowledge of the COMET partners, which comes from industry, research institutes, and universities. Since the inaugural meeting in September 2010, partners have demonstrated their ability to work as a team, providing a good foundation for the COMET project to move forward and develop new and exciting robot technologies in 2011.”

Klas Nilsson, associate professor from COMET partner, the University of Lund in Sweden, also believes that the project will have major benefits. He said: “This type of project, where you bring together competencies from across Europe, will find new problems too! Together we are able to complement each other to find the best solutions to these problems.”

John Pandremenos from the University of Patras in Greece and dissemination manager of the project, said: “If the project achieves its objectives it will bring big innovations to the manufacturing sector in European industry. It will significantly reduce the cost of machining operations.”

A video about the project can also be viewed at www.youtube.com/user/COMETproject, or visit the project website at www.comet-project.eu.

- Suzanne Gill is editor of Control Engineering Europe. This article appeared originally appeared at www.controlengeurope.com and was edited for the Control Engineering International pages in the January 2012 North American edition of Control Engineering.



No comments
The Top Plant program honors outstanding manufacturing facilities in North America. View the 2013 Top Plant.
The Product of the Year program recognizes products newly released in the manufacturing industries.
The Engineering Leaders Under 40 program identifies and gives recognition to young engineers who...
The true cost of lubrication: Three keys to consider when evaluating oils; Plant Engineering Lubrication Guide; 11 ways to protect bearing assets; Is lubrication part of your KPIs?
Contract maintenance: 5 ways to keep things humming while keeping an eye on costs; Pneumatic systems; Energy monitoring; The sixth 'S' is safety
Transport your data: Supply chain information critical to operational excellence; High-voltage faults; Portable cooling; Safety automation isn't automatic
Case Study Database

Case Study Database

Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Plant Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.

These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.

Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.

Maintaining low data center PUE; Using eco mode in UPS systems; Commissioning electrical and power systems; Exploring dc power distribution alternatives
Synchronizing industrial Ethernet networks; Selecting protocol conversion gateways; Integrating HMIs with PLCs and PACs
Why manufacturers need to see energy in a different light: Current approaches to energy management yield quick savings, but leave plant managers searching for ways of improving on those early gains.

Annual Salary Survey

Participate in the 2013 Salary Survey

In a year when manufacturing continued to lead the economic rebound, it makes sense that plant manager bonuses rebounded. Plant Engineering’s annual Salary Survey shows both wages and bonuses rose in 2012 after a retreat the year before.

Average salary across all job titles for plant floor management rose 3.5% to $95,446, and bonus compensation jumped to $15,162, a 4.2% increase from the 2010 level and double the 2011 total, which showed a sharp drop in bonus.

2012 Salary Survey Analysis

2012 Salary Survey Results

Maintenance and reliability tips and best practices from the maintenance and reliability coaches at Allied Reliability Group.
The One Voice for Manufacturing blog reports on federal public policy issues impacting the manufacturing sector. One Voice is a joint effort by the National Tooling and Machining...
The Society for Maintenance and Reliability Professionals an organization devoted...
Join this ongoing discussion of machine guarding topics, including solutions assessments, regulatory compliance, gap analysis...
IMS Research, recently acquired by IHS Inc., is a leading independent supplier of market research and consultancy to the global electronics industry.
Maintenance is not optional in manufacturing. It’s a profit center, driving productivity and uptime while reducing overall repair costs.
The Lachance on CMMS blog is about current maintenance topics. Blogger Paul Lachance is president and chief technology officer for Smartware Group.