Experts not required: Optimization tool offers easy way to measure true cost of carbon footprint
Companies can use Transportation Analyst 2.0 to determine the optimal size of their fleets, find opportunities for combining forward and reverse logistics, or decide on how often they should schedule deliveries to certain locations or customers.<br/>
For many manufacturers, optimizing transportation networks achieves the twin goals of lowering operating costs and reducing environmental impact.
Now supply chain optimization specialist ILOG has equipped the latest version of its transportation planning application with functionality for calculating the carbon footprint associated with various transportation strategies.
Companies can use this solution—called Transportation Analyst 2.0—to determine the optimal size of their fleets, find opportunities for combining forward and reverse logistics, or decide how often they should schedule deliveries to certain locations or customers.
Derek Nelson, an ILOG product manager, expects the solution to attract widespread interest partly because it doesn’t require an expert in optimization techniques—or even a professional transportation planner—to operate. “It allows the supply chain person or business professional to ask the kinds of questions they want to ask,” Nelson explains.
As the name implies, Transportation Analyst 2.0 is an upgraded version of an existing ILOG application. Nelson says this version allows companies to more than manage their own private transportation fleets.
Now users can analyze the trade-offs between using private fleets, commercial delivery services, and less-than-truckload shipping. They also can model consolidation and deconsolidation options to determine whether it’s more economical to go through a hub or to ship directly to a customer.
Transportation Analyst 2.0 also helps companies calculate their transportation-related carbon footprints. And as David Simchi-Levy, professor of engineering systems at Massachusetts Institute of Technology and chief science officer for ILOG, points out, carbon footprints and costs often go hand in hand.
“Why do we see more companies looking to reduce their carbon footprint?” Simchi-Levy asks. “In many cases, it’s driven by oil prices, which directly impact transportation costs. The point being that a high carbon footprint isn’t just a problem for the environment—it’s also a sign of an inefficient transportation system. So reducing your carbon footprint implies improving your transportation system—or vice versa. When you look at it this way, you realize there are specific benefits to be gained by focusing on reducing your carbon footprint.”
Case Study Database
Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Plant Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.
These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.
Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.
2012 Salary Survey
In a year when manufacturing continued to lead the economic rebound, it makes sense that plant manager bonuses rebounded. Plant Engineering’s annual Salary Survey shows both wages and bonuses rose in 2012 after a retreat the year before.
Average salary across all job titles for plant floor management rose 3.5% to $95,446, and bonus compensation jumped to $15,162, a 4.2% increase from the 2010 level and double the 2011 total, which showed a sharp drop in bonus.