Engineering passion, OEE ideas

Ticket into engineering My ticket into the engineering profession was my dad. He would help me with middle school math and science homework, but would use about 10 pages of clipboard paper, ultimately taking everything back to first principles. On occasion, I was allowed to borrow his Texas Instruments 8-digit LED calculator to check my work.

02/01/2008


Ticket into engineering

My ticket into the engineering profession was my dad. He would help me with middle school math and science homework, but would use about 10 pages of clipboard paper, ultimately taking everything back to first principles. On occasion, I was allowed to borrow his Texas Instruments 8-digit LED calculator to check my work.

Dietrich Schilberg, Sr. Process Control Engineer
Calvert City, KY

Thank you very much for sharing your thoughts with us, Dietrich. Like many readers who responded to our “Closing the Skills Gap” article (January 2008 issue), parents or relatives played an instrumental role in forging an early passion for Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM.) Some of the organizations mentioned in the article — such as US FIRST — also offer programs for grade school students. For more information on early education programs, visit www.usfirst.org and mouse over the “what we do” link on the menu. Better still, Google “STEM education” and check out the comprehensive list of programs available. But remember… inspiration starts at home. Be sure to keep your kids and grandkids interested in what you’re working on and the fascination will follow.

Marc Moschetto, marc.moschetto@reedbusiness.com

A wheel without an axle?

The Dec. 4, 2007, entry of the “Standard profits: Make2Pack and ISA88” blog (accessible via the homepage on www.controleng.com ) says, in part: “The Make2Pack effort does not want to reinvent the wheel. It does want to provide a formalized and repeatable way to connect wheels together to improve the construction of the desired end result, a wagon say or even a car? How about manufacturing automation!”

Today there is an automation standard that in my mind describes a lot of great wheels and how to make wheels for any need: the IEC 61499 standard on function blocks. Without these wheels, the axle is of little use except to bash things into submission, which often is the approach used in automation today.

Make2Pack intends to leverage the 61499 standard as a core part of creating a formalized and standard way to connect the 61499 wheels. The 61499 standard, like the S88 standard from ISA, identifies the need to organize and coordinate control elements to achieve the desired automation goal. Both these great standards leave a bit too much to the imagination as how to do this, and the results are very inconsistent from application to application. Taking the 61499 concepts and building a shell around the function block that can be used to manage the coordination of external connections in a formalized way is the approach being developed by the Make2Pack (M2P) effort.

David A. Chappell, Chairman, Make2Pack
www.controleng.com/blog.html

Grandpa’s idea?

I just saw your article “Not Your Grandfather’s Conveyor Line!” (Nov. 2007) and thought you might be interested in seeing how old this idea really is. Please take a look at these sites: www.innalytical.com/html/case_8.html and www.innalytical.com/html/case_9.html . Obviously there are differences, but the concept is the same. Thanks for your time.

Paul D. Terpstra P.E., President, Innalytical Solutions
www.innalytical.com , pterpstra@innalytical.com

This is an interesting and clever design. I’d bet that we could find even older designs if we looked. What makes the current era interesting is that we have a critical mass of automation hardware and software to take full advantage of such technology.

Charlie Masi, charlie.masi@reedbusiness.com

OEE explained further

You are more than welcome to quote my paper (in Back to Basics: Overall Equipment Effectiveness, January 2008). I would raise the caution, however, that there is no such “fact” that 85% is considered a “world-class rate.” In fact, when considering process flow in discrete manufacturing, you can have a balanced flow with an OEE considerably less that 50% and still be as productive as the process can ever be. Unfortunately, the purveyors of software, OEE devices, and many books and articles do not fully appreciate the nuances of OEE. The OEE calculation should ONLY be used to compare an equipment item performance to itself over time: Never to other, dissimilar equipment, nor aggregated for anything other than a single machine, equipment or discrete process.

Robert (Bob) Williamson, Strategic Work Systems, Inc.
www.swspitcrew.com





No comments
The Top Plant program honors outstanding manufacturing facilities in North America. View the 2013 Top Plant.
The Product of the Year program recognizes products newly released in the manufacturing industries.
The Leaders Under 40 program features outstanding young people who are making a difference in manufacturing. View the 2013 Leaders here.
The new control room: It's got all the bells and whistles - and alarms, too; Remote maintenance; Specifying VFDs
2014 forecast issue: To serve and to manufacture - Veterans will bring skill and discipline to the plant floor if we can find a way to get them there.
2013 Top Plant: Lincoln Electric Company, Cleveland, Ohio
Case Study Database

Case Study Database

Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Plant Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.

These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.

Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.

Bring focus to PLC programming: 5 things to avoid in putting your system together; Managing the DCS upgrade; PLM upgrade: a step-by-step approach
Balancing the bagging triangle; PID tuning improves process efficiency; Standardizing control room HMIs
Commissioning electrical systems in mission critical facilities; Anticipating the Smart Grid; Mitigating arc flash hazards in medium-voltage switchgear; Comparing generator sizing software

Annual Salary Survey

Participate in the 2013 Salary Survey

In a year when manufacturing continued to lead the economic rebound, it makes sense that plant manager bonuses rebounded. Plant Engineering’s annual Salary Survey shows both wages and bonuses rose in 2012 after a retreat the year before.

Average salary across all job titles for plant floor management rose 3.5% to $95,446, and bonus compensation jumped to $15,162, a 4.2% increase from the 2010 level and double the 2011 total, which showed a sharp drop in bonus.

2012 Salary Survey Analysis

2012 Salary Survey Results

Maintenance and reliability tips and best practices from the maintenance and reliability coaches at Allied Reliability Group.
The One Voice for Manufacturing blog reports on federal public policy issues impacting the manufacturing sector. One Voice is a joint effort by the National Tooling and Machining...
The Society for Maintenance and Reliability Professionals an organization devoted...
Join this ongoing discussion of machine guarding topics, including solutions assessments, regulatory compliance, gap analysis...
IMS Research, recently acquired by IHS Inc., is a leading independent supplier of market research and consultancy to the global electronics industry.
Maintenance is not optional in manufacturing. It’s a profit center, driving productivity and uptime while reducing overall repair costs.
The Lachance on CMMS blog is about current maintenance topics. Blogger Paul Lachance is president and chief technology officer for Smartware Group.