Energy Consumption Management

Engineers need to look at energy consumption management as a direct means to improve profitability and productivity, not simply as a cost cutting measure. The first step involves seeing energy in 3D.



As an operations manager, control engineer, or machine operator, you have always been measured by your ability to cut costs. You have made just about every money-saving effort possible to maximize throughput and minimize waste. With everything squeezed about as tight as it can be, where else can you turn to help improve profitability?

While energy use has the potential to be a new frontier in cost savings, it is one of the most elusive and hard-to-manage costs in manufacturing. Traditionally, industrial energy consumption was seen one-dimensionally as an unavoidable cost of doing business. But the fact is, managing energy is actually a three-dimensional challenge: less, cheaper, and optimal.

While some energy is used for facility operations such as heating, cooling, and lighting the building, the majority of energy coming into the plant is used to power machinery, convert raw materials into intermediate products, generate steam, or facilitate production. Through behavioral and programming changes, you can actually use less energy—for example, by using more efficient equipment, reusing waste heat in your processes, or scheduling production to minimize energy-intensive changeover procedures. You also can use cheaper energy by managing where, how, and when energy is used in order to harness it when it is least expensive, such as during off-peak times.

Finally, you can optimize energy use to achieve production goals in the least expensive, most profitable way while balancing the many variables inherent to manufacturing. This dimension will ultimately have the most impact on financial performance, because you can actively manage energy as one of many inputs to the overall production equation. Here's how.

The greenprint approach

The seven pillars of energy management outlined here can be leveraged independently or simultaneously to transform your energy management strategy into a holistic and strategic program. It is a blueprint — or as we call it, a greenprint — for using your existing automation and power control assets to begin saving energy more effectively, and investing it more intelligently.

Pillar 1: Facility monitoring. Before you can begin to manage your energy consumption, you have to gain visibility into your energy usage and quality patterns. Chances are you’re already measuring your energy consumption at some level. To expand that knowledge, an assessment of your manufacturing facility can help establish the scope of an energy savings effort, define key metrics, and help you get the necessary resources in place in order to take a holistic view of energy usage throughout the facility.

You also can monitor the facility’s metering infrastructure to collect data about all energy resources — water, air, gas, electricity, steam, or other sources — in relation to equipment usage and environmental conditions. This data can then be logged and time-stamped in an energy historian software program to establish trends, discrepancies, and benchmarks for improvement.

With this big picture view, you can identify and make operational changes to help reduce energy consumption and costs. These might include shedding loads or lowering power levels when the facility is approaching peak use. The information gathered at the facility monitoring level also can help you understand and manage power quality issues such as voltage sags or harmonics that can damage equipment and cause power factor problems on the electrical grid. As a result, you can better protect your equipment, and avoid incurring penalty fees from utility companies that might charge for correcting power factor issues.

Assessing and monitoring usage should be an ongoing effort in order to identify variables such as how seasons might affect production variables and whether previously implemented improvements are continuing to perform as planned.

Pillar 2: Production monitoring. To understand plant floor energy consumption, work with your automation solutions provider to identify useful data collection points across machines and lines, and program your information systems to store and analyze that data. Once a system is in place, you can separate plant floor consumption data from facility consumption data, and gain a clearer view of exactly how much of the company’s overall energy use is consumed by the manufacturing process versus operational functions such as data centers and HVAC.

By gaining a clearer understanding of energy consumption at the plant-floor level, you could modify your equipment effectiveness calculations to include energy efficiency as part of the equipment’s overall performance metrics and optimizing performance curves of output versus cost. Consumption data also can be applied to traditional Lean Six Sigma tools to optimize operations. For example, a North American packaging company used plant floor energy consumption data with traditional value stream mapping data to re-sequence production operations and reduce energy costs. The company saved $66,000 in one year by moving energy intense operations outside the demand window and storing lower cost energy for work in progress.

Pillar 3: Capturing energy on the production BOM. Once manufacturing energy consumption data is stored and analyzed in the information system, you can begin to see clear trends in how energy has been used in various historical events such as a specific product cycle or batch. You no longer have to guess what energy consumption will be for similar production runs in the future; you actually can begin to project it in advance. In doing so, you move to a new pillar of the energy management architecture in which energy requirements are included in resource planning and scheduling decisions in the same way that raw materials are considered an element on bills of material (BOM).

Empirically tying energy consumption requirements to the production BOM helps you make proactive production decisions and better manage energy investments in a way that will generate a greater return. For example, by knowing that certain batches require more energy, you can move those batches outside peak windows. In addition, the unit-level energy consumption information becomes valuable input to your company’s sustainability reporting mechanisms.

Pillar 4: Modeling. Once you know how much energy is required to run a specific production cycle, you can leverage production simulation software tools to input variables such as peak and off-peak energy costs, raw material costs, labor, and projected emissions, and pre-test “what-if” scenarios to see how production outputs and costs will change as a result of modifications.

Within this pillar, you can optimize all production assets and forecast the most economical way to manufacture your products, using energy as one of the variables. You also can forecast the full sequence of production scheduling to optimize overall production.

Pillar 5: Controlling. With all the manufacturing applications and automation solutions on the plant floor generating data, the next pillar in the energy management architecture is to drive all data sets into a common automated solution that can identify, model, visualize and present control options, or automatically control production changes. While this might be beyond the scope of your day-to-day tasks, the modeling capability would automatically implement decisions without unnecessary intervention on your part. These decisions can extend past simple plant floor production variables to include additional variables that you are not directly measuring, such as last-minute staffing changes or urgent orders placed by key customers on short notice.

Pillars 6 & 7: Responding and scorecarding. Once you are confident about the energy management activities within the plant, your company can make external market and regulatory influences part of its overarching energy management strategy. It will then be possible to shift the perspective outside the facility and begin to focus on how to make intelligent economic decisions based on altering energy consumption in response to market fluctuation and regulatory demands.

Author Information

Phil Kaufman is business manager, power and energy management products; and Marcia Walker is program manager, sustainable production, for Rockwell Automation.

Greenprint white paper

The seven-pillar greenprint methodology is outlined in more detail in a white paper titled “Industrial Energy Optimization: Managing Energy Consumption for Higher Profitability” and is available as a free download on the Rockwell Automation Web site at: .


No comments
The Top Plant program honors outstanding manufacturing facilities in North America. View the 2013 Top Plant.
The Product of the Year program recognizes products newly released in the manufacturing industries.
The Leaders Under 40 program features outstanding young people who are making a difference in manufacturing. View the 2013 Leaders here.
The new control room: It's got all the bells and whistles - and alarms, too; Remote maintenance; Specifying VFDs
2014 forecast issue: To serve and to manufacture - Veterans will bring skill and discipline to the plant floor if we can find a way to get them there.
2013 Top Plant: Lincoln Electric Company, Cleveland, Ohio
Case Study Database

Case Study Database

Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Plant Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.

These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.

Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.

Bring focus to PLC programming: 5 things to avoid in putting your system together; Managing the DCS upgrade; PLM upgrade: a step-by-step approach
Balancing the bagging triangle; PID tuning improves process efficiency; Standardizing control room HMIs
Commissioning electrical systems in mission critical facilities; Anticipating the Smart Grid; Mitigating arc flash hazards in medium-voltage switchgear; Comparing generator sizing software

Annual Salary Survey

Participate in the 2013 Salary Survey

In a year when manufacturing continued to lead the economic rebound, it makes sense that plant manager bonuses rebounded. Plant Engineering’s annual Salary Survey shows both wages and bonuses rose in 2012 after a retreat the year before.

Average salary across all job titles for plant floor management rose 3.5% to $95,446, and bonus compensation jumped to $15,162, a 4.2% increase from the 2010 level and double the 2011 total, which showed a sharp drop in bonus.

2012 Salary Survey Analysis

2012 Salary Survey Results

Maintenance and reliability tips and best practices from the maintenance and reliability coaches at Allied Reliability Group.
The One Voice for Manufacturing blog reports on federal public policy issues impacting the manufacturing sector. One Voice is a joint effort by the National Tooling and Machining...
The Society for Maintenance and Reliability Professionals an organization devoted...
Join this ongoing discussion of machine guarding topics, including solutions assessments, regulatory compliance, gap analysis...
IMS Research, recently acquired by IHS Inc., is a leading independent supplier of market research and consultancy to the global electronics industry.
Maintenance is not optional in manufacturing. It’s a profit center, driving productivity and uptime while reducing overall repair costs.
The Lachance on CMMS blog is about current maintenance topics. Blogger Paul Lachance is president and chief technology officer for Smartware Group.