Energy a top-of-mind topic for manufacturing execs
But Johnson Controls/IFMA study finds barriers to action
Energy efficiency has never been more important, according to new research commissioned by Johnson Controls . The Energy Efficiency Indicator (EEI) survey, a research report targeting professionals responsible for energy management, revealed barriers to investing in energy efficiency include: limited funding, uncertainty about future energy prices, government incentives, and energy and climate legislation.
"These findings highlight the fact that business leaders across the U.S. are increasingly aware of the need for energy efficiency and its potential to reduce operating costs while cutting greenhouse gas emissions," said C. David Myers, president of Johnson Controls Building Efficiency division. "Economic and regulatory uncertainty, however, are inhibiting organizations from investing in proactive measures," added Myers.
Johnson Controls partnered with the International Facility Management Association to commission the survey of more than 1,400 North American executives who are responsible for managing, reviewing or monitoring energy use within their organizations. The majority of respondents were chief executive officers, vice presidents, general managers or facility directors.
According to the EEI results, 71% of business leaders are paying more attention to energy efficiency than they were one year ago. Another 58% responded that energy management was extremely or very important. Of the organizations making public carbon commitments, 45% identified energy efficiency in buildings as their top carbon reduction strategy. Sustainability continues as a focus for new construction projects as 38% are seeking green building certification, while 45% plan to incorporate green elements, but not certify their facilities.
"This research recognizes the important role workplace professionals play in controlling operational costs related to energy consumption and making strategic capital investments in high-performing building technologies," said Don Young, vice president of communications, IFMA. "Indications are that as the economy recovers we will see greater investments in energy reduction and sustainable initiatives."
The study revealed a likely 10% decrease from last year in the use of facility capital budgets to fund energy efficiency projects. It also revealed a 6% decrease in the number of respondents planning to make investments using their operational budgets.
When asked about the barriers to capture potential energy savings, limited capital availability for investments (42%) and unattractive payback (21%) were cited. Nearly 50% of executives who oversee energy efficiency investments expect a payback period that is less than three years.
Market uncertainty related to carbon policy, incentives and energy prices
The EEI research indicates that business leaders believe incentives from utilities or government will drive investment. Eighty-five% stated that legislation mandating energy efficiency and/or carbon reduction is likely within the next two years. This data supports a continual upward trend, increasing from 76% in 2008.
The study found 44% of executives said that incentives are very/extremely important as they make decisions on energy efficiency, up from 38% in 2008.
There doesn't seem to be a consensus among respondents about whether energy prices will decrease or increase.
"We see a wide distribution of views about what will happen to energy prices -- ranging from a 100% increase to a 60% decrease," according to Clay Nesler, vice president of Global Energy & Sustainability at Johnson Controls. "This uncertainty appears to be another reason business leaders are holding back on investments," said Nesler.
Survey participants also were asked about on-site renewable energy technologies. Leaders stated they were considering a range of technologies, including wind, solar thermal, solar electric and geothermal sources of energy. Forty-six% reported considering solar electric - an increase of 8% over the previous year. Geothermal energy also received a substantial increase in interest level, up by seven%.
More than 1,400 leaders at the front lines of energy management and efficiency were polled through an on-line survey, conducted in April 2009. For more information about these findings, please go to www.johnsoncontrols.com .
Case Study Database
Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Plant Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.
These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.
Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.
2012 Salary Survey
In a year when manufacturing continued to lead the economic rebound, it makes sense that plant manager bonuses rebounded. Plant Engineering’s annual Salary Survey shows both wages and bonuses rose in 2012 after a retreat the year before.
Average salary across all job titles for plant floor management rose 3.5% to $95,446, and bonus compensation jumped to $15,162, a 4.2% increase from the 2010 level and double the 2011 total, which showed a sharp drop in bonus.