Electrical product safety: Are testing labs needed or is a supplier's declaration enough?

European Commission asked OSHA to consider Supplier’s Declaration of Conformity (SDoC) as an alternative to third-party certification of electrical products; NEMA prefers nationally recognized testing laboratories (NRTLs) product-approval process, saying anything less could decrease worker safety. Will your company comment to OSHA about this by Jan. 20?

01/06/2009


Rosslyn, VA – European Commission asked OSHA to consider Supplier’s Declaration of Conformity (SDoC) as an alternative to third-party certification of electrical products; National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) and others prefer that

NEMA suggests to OSHA that nationally recognized testing labs do more for electrical product safety than supplier declarations.

Read the rest of NEMA's electrical product testing safety concerns in a related PDF.


NEMA and 17 other organizations have submitted a letter to Thomas M. Stohler, Acting Assistant Secretary for Occupational Safety and Health, delineating concerns about the consideration by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) of a proposal to adopt Supplier’s Declaration of Conformity (SDoC) as an alternative to third-party certification of electrical products in U.S. workplaces.
In October, at the request of the European Commission, OSHA published a Request for Information in the Federal Register on a proposal to permit use of an SDoC as an alternative to the nationally-recognized testing laboratories (NRTLs) product-approval process. In a response to Stohler, NEMA and its coalition allies stress safety benefits of using third-party certification for electrical products and commended the OSHA NRTL program as an efficient and cost-effective way to ensure the safety of workers.
NEMA plans to submit detailed comments on specific issues by Jan. 20, 2009, the deadline for filing individual responses.
The letter cautions, “At a time when the safety and competitive threats posed by substandard and counterfeit products in general are markedly rising, opening the door to uncertified products would seem to exacerbate this problem.”
According to the letter, “The U.S. electrical safety system, which is principally based on third-party certification, is regarded as one of the most effective systems in the world for successfully ensuring workplace safety, while at the same time allowing for free and open market access for products and services, with minimal cost to the taxpayer. Indeed, those who now wish to institutionalize SDoC must accept that the checks-and-balances of our current system have played a fundamental role in driving U.S. electrical products to be the safest in the world.”
Another contention of the group is that during a time of global toy, food, and financial concerns, such a change seems especially inappropriate.
NEMA president and CEO Evan R. Gaddis said, “We are hopeful that OSHA will not be influenced by false claims that international trade priorities necessitate replacing the well-established NRTL program with SDoC. It would be unwise to compromise the most successful electrical safety system in the world.”
Represented in the coalition are the Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers, the Consumers Union, the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, the National Electrical Contractors Association, and Underwriters Laboratories, to name a few.
NEMA provides the letter and list of coalition members in a PDF document .
Also

get a Control Engineering inside

.

– Control Engineering News Desk
Register here and scroll down to select your choice of eNewsletters free.





No comments
The Top Plant program honors outstanding manufacturing facilities in North America. View the 2013 Top Plant.
The Product of the Year program recognizes products newly released in the manufacturing industries.
The Leaders Under 40 program features outstanding young people who are making a difference in manufacturing. View the 2013 Leaders here.
The new control room: It's got all the bells and whistles - and alarms, too; Remote maintenance; Specifying VFDs
2014 forecast issue: To serve and to manufacture - Veterans will bring skill and discipline to the plant floor if we can find a way to get them there.
2013 Top Plant: Lincoln Electric Company, Cleveland, Ohio
Case Study Database

Case Study Database

Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Plant Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.

These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.

Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.

Bring focus to PLC programming: 5 things to avoid in putting your system together; Managing the DCS upgrade; PLM upgrade: a step-by-step approach
Balancing the bagging triangle; PID tuning improves process efficiency; Standardizing control room HMIs
Commissioning electrical systems in mission critical facilities; Anticipating the Smart Grid; Mitigating arc flash hazards in medium-voltage switchgear; Comparing generator sizing software

Annual Salary Survey

Participate in the 2013 Salary Survey

In a year when manufacturing continued to lead the economic rebound, it makes sense that plant manager bonuses rebounded. Plant Engineering’s annual Salary Survey shows both wages and bonuses rose in 2012 after a retreat the year before.

Average salary across all job titles for plant floor management rose 3.5% to $95,446, and bonus compensation jumped to $15,162, a 4.2% increase from the 2010 level and double the 2011 total, which showed a sharp drop in bonus.

2012 Salary Survey Analysis

2012 Salary Survey Results

Maintenance and reliability tips and best practices from the maintenance and reliability coaches at Allied Reliability Group.
The One Voice for Manufacturing blog reports on federal public policy issues impacting the manufacturing sector. One Voice is a joint effort by the National Tooling and Machining...
The Society for Maintenance and Reliability Professionals an organization devoted...
Join this ongoing discussion of machine guarding topics, including solutions assessments, regulatory compliance, gap analysis...
IMS Research, recently acquired by IHS Inc., is a leading independent supplier of market research and consultancy to the global electronics industry.
Maintenance is not optional in manufacturing. It’s a profit center, driving productivity and uptime while reducing overall repair costs.
The Lachance on CMMS blog is about current maintenance topics. Blogger Paul Lachance is president and chief technology officer for Smartware Group.