Ed Miller: Leverage engineering simulation across the enterprise

Manufacturers across a range of industries would be hard pressed to design products without simulation tools such as structural analysis, multi-body simulation, and computational fluid dynamics. Yet despite their importance, manufacturers typically do a poor job of managing analysis results and related work processes.

03/01/2008


Manufacturers across a range of industries would be hard pressed to design products without simulation tools such as structural analysis, multi-body simulation, and computational fluid dynamics. Yet despite their importance, manufacturers typically do a poor job of managing analysis results and related work processes.

Companies generally have no formal system in place for properly archiving and managing analysis results and information relating to how problems were set up, which analysis software was used, which analyses were executed, what decisions were made, who made approvals, and when changes were made. This information often is discarded, buried in disorganized filing systems, or stored only in the recollections of a few individuals.

Such information loss forces engineers and analysts to recreate data over and over. Problems are magnified when people in different locations work on the same simulation projects with no system for exchanging analysis data or standardizing and integrating work processes.

Recognizing the drawback here, leading-edge manufacturers are implementing programs to get their simulation data under control, and better manage their simulation process knowledge. This includes managing simulation data as part of their product life-cycle management (PLM) strategies as they have previously done with CAD files, technical specifications, change orders, and other data related to design engineering. Via a central repository of simulation-related data, people across the enterprise can collaborate and access the information they need, when they need it.

By following this approach, simulation can be transformed from a domain exclusively for specialists into a visible and accessible component of the product development process across the full product life cycle and throughout the extended enterprise. Simulation capabilities thus become available much more broadly throughout a company, from purchasing to sales, to make more informed and confident decisions. This can lead to faster responses to customer requests while improving design variation predictability, and leading to more accurate quotations and higher profitability.

Moreover, with engineering simulation and manufacturing operations tied more closely together, production quality and throughput undoubtedly benefit.

With simulation processes integrated with PLM as part of a company's business strategy, engineers can better utilize simulation tools in developing products to fit in with corporate goals. Time is saved, errors reduced, and collaboration facilitated because information is readily accessed, ideas shared, correct revisions used, and results archived.

Estimated measurable cost savings are stunning for companies implementing enterprise simulation management: 90-percent cost reductions in executing simulations through greater efficiencies and process management, 60-percent savings through increased analysis model reuse, 40-percent less expense for building and testing physical prototypes, and 40-percent savings in simulation technology budgets through consolidation of analysis tools and methods.

Companies committed to moving toward enterprise simulation management will have a significant competitive advantage in the coming years as the role of engineering analysis continues to grow in scope and importance within manufacturing companies.


Author Information

Ed Miller is president of CIMdata Inc. (




No comments
The Top Plant program honors outstanding manufacturing facilities in North America. View the 2013 Top Plant.
The Product of the Year program recognizes products newly released in the manufacturing industries.
The Leaders Under 40 program features outstanding young people who are making a difference in manufacturing. View the 2013 Leaders here.
The new control room: It's got all the bells and whistles - and alarms, too; Remote maintenance; Specifying VFDs
2014 forecast issue: To serve and to manufacture - Veterans will bring skill and discipline to the plant floor if we can find a way to get them there.
2013 Top Plant: Lincoln Electric Company, Cleveland, Ohio
Case Study Database

Case Study Database

Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Plant Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.

These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.

Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.

Why manufacturers need to see energy in a different light: Current approaches to energy management yield quick savings, but leave plant managers searching for ways of improving on those early gains.
Electric motor power measurement and analysis: Understand the basics to drive greater efficiency; Selecting the right control chart; Linear position sensors gain acceptance
Protecting standby generators for mission critical facilities; Selecting energy-efficient transformers; Integrating power monitoring systems; Mitigating harmonics in electrical systems

Annual Salary Survey

Participate in the 2013 Salary Survey

In a year when manufacturing continued to lead the economic rebound, it makes sense that plant manager bonuses rebounded. Plant Engineering’s annual Salary Survey shows both wages and bonuses rose in 2012 after a retreat the year before.

Average salary across all job titles for plant floor management rose 3.5% to $95,446, and bonus compensation jumped to $15,162, a 4.2% increase from the 2010 level and double the 2011 total, which showed a sharp drop in bonus.

2012 Salary Survey Analysis

2012 Salary Survey Results

Maintenance and reliability tips and best practices from the maintenance and reliability coaches at Allied Reliability Group.
The One Voice for Manufacturing blog reports on federal public policy issues impacting the manufacturing sector. One Voice is a joint effort by the National Tooling and Machining...
The Society for Maintenance and Reliability Professionals an organization devoted...
Join this ongoing discussion of machine guarding topics, including solutions assessments, regulatory compliance, gap analysis...
IMS Research, recently acquired by IHS Inc., is a leading independent supplier of market research and consultancy to the global electronics industry.
Maintenance is not optional in manufacturing. It’s a profit center, driving productivity and uptime while reducing overall repair costs.
The Lachance on CMMS blog is about current maintenance topics. Blogger Paul Lachance is president and chief technology officer for Smartware Group.