DuPont under fire by Federal investigators

Federal investigators said DuPont should examine "all facets of its safety culture" and that could have fixed problems that led to one worker's death at a plant in Belle, WV last year

09/20/2011


The U.S. Chemical Safety Board contrasted DuPont’s failures with its reputation as a company that sells workplace safety programs to other corporations.

“The events before and after the string of incidents in January 2010 suggest that the safety culture (at DuPont) has shifted,” the board wrote in a report. The company “is not operating as it has historically, and could benefit from an extensive examination of all facets of the safety culture, both within the facility and extending throughout the corporation.”

The chemical safety board faulted DuPont for maintenance, inspection and training deficiencies related to three chemical leaks discovered at the Belle plant during a 33-hour period in January 2010. The findings echoed those of the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration, which last year fined the company $43,000 and cited it for “serious violations” in relation to the leaks.

Internal company documents released by investigators showed even though DuPont engineers knew for decades the equipment at the Belle facility could be safer, the company failed to heed their recommendations.

DuPont did not have an immediate response.

The safety board described several near misses at the Belle facility, but focused on a Jan. 23, 2010, incident that led to the death of an employee who had worked at the plant for 32 years. The worker suffered exposure to phosgene — a World War I choking agent used in plastics and pesticides — leaking from a corroded hose.

The investigators learned on the same day as the accident, which occurred on a Saturday afternoon, plant employees noticed the outer lining of a phosgene hose in that area of the plant had frayed, but decided to wait until Monday to tell supervisors. The report said plant managers didn’t have a system in place for reporting near misses on weekends.

Investigators also said the braided steel hoses didn’t meet DuPont’s own specifications. As early as 1987, a company expert had suggested to colleagues the phosgene hoses at Belle should be made from a different metal, Monel, that would be more resistant to corrosion. “Admittedly, the Monel hose will cost more than its stainless counterpart. However … costs will be less in the long run and safety will also be improved,” the official wrote.

The safety board said it didn’t know why the Belle facility didn’t heed that advice.

DuPont also missed warning signs foreshadowing the other two accidents, though no workers reported exposure after those incidents, the safety board said.

One day before the fatal leak, employees at the Belle plant discovered a problem in a separate part of the plant: Methyl chloride, an herbicide ingredient that can be fatal in high concentrations, had been leaking into the atmosphere for five days. Workers had continued using the equipment despite alarms indicating a disc used to control pressure had burst. Previously, DuPont’s safety auditors had warned the alarm system for that part of the equipment activated too often, leading workers to dismiss alarms as a nuisance, the safety board said.

On the following morning, a cloud of sulfuric acid and steam released from of a corroded pipe in another part of the Belle facility. DuPont had identified problems with pipes in that part of the plant in 2009, yet it hadn’t followed through on a recommendation they schedule them for preventative maintenance, the safety board investigators found.

After two hazardous leaks in as many days, managers at the Belle plant decided to temporarily stop work at the entire facility. Supervisors began arriving around noon on Jan. 23 to start planning a “safety pause” during which they would evaluate what had happened and how to respond. That meeting had barely begun when, at 2 p.m., the group got word of yet another emergency. This time, a worker suffered from exposure.

- Edited by Chris Vavra, Plant Engineering, www.plantengineering.com 



No comments
The Top Plant program honors outstanding manufacturing facilities in North America. View the 2013 Top Plant.
The Product of the Year program recognizes products newly released in the manufacturing industries.
The Engineering Leaders Under 40 program identifies and gives recognition to young engineers who...
The true cost of lubrication: Three keys to consider when evaluating oils; Plant Engineering Lubrication Guide; 11 ways to protect bearing assets; Is lubrication part of your KPIs?
Contract maintenance: 5 ways to keep things humming while keeping an eye on costs; Pneumatic systems; Energy monitoring; The sixth 'S' is safety
Transport your data: Supply chain information critical to operational excellence; High-voltage faults; Portable cooling; Safety automation isn't automatic
Case Study Database

Case Study Database

Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Plant Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.

These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.

Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.

Maintaining low data center PUE; Using eco mode in UPS systems; Commissioning electrical and power systems; Exploring dc power distribution alternatives
Synchronizing industrial Ethernet networks; Selecting protocol conversion gateways; Integrating HMIs with PLCs and PACs
Why manufacturers need to see energy in a different light: Current approaches to energy management yield quick savings, but leave plant managers searching for ways of improving on those early gains.

Annual Salary Survey

Participate in the 2013 Salary Survey

In a year when manufacturing continued to lead the economic rebound, it makes sense that plant manager bonuses rebounded. Plant Engineering’s annual Salary Survey shows both wages and bonuses rose in 2012 after a retreat the year before.

Average salary across all job titles for plant floor management rose 3.5% to $95,446, and bonus compensation jumped to $15,162, a 4.2% increase from the 2010 level and double the 2011 total, which showed a sharp drop in bonus.

2012 Salary Survey Analysis

2012 Salary Survey Results

Maintenance and reliability tips and best practices from the maintenance and reliability coaches at Allied Reliability Group.
The One Voice for Manufacturing blog reports on federal public policy issues impacting the manufacturing sector. One Voice is a joint effort by the National Tooling and Machining...
The Society for Maintenance and Reliability Professionals an organization devoted...
Join this ongoing discussion of machine guarding topics, including solutions assessments, regulatory compliance, gap analysis...
IMS Research, recently acquired by IHS Inc., is a leading independent supplier of market research and consultancy to the global electronics industry.
Maintenance is not optional in manufacturing. It’s a profit center, driving productivity and uptime while reducing overall repair costs.
The Lachance on CMMS blog is about current maintenance topics. Blogger Paul Lachance is president and chief technology officer for Smartware Group.