Dos and don'ts for making permanent process improvements

Making process improvements that stick within maintenance organizations is a long-term commitment that requires a cultural change with a specific plan and a strong mandate from management that encourages workers to keep making positive changes on all levels.


Making process improvements that stick within maintenance organizations is a long-term commitment that requires a cultural change with a specific plan and a strong mandate from management that encourages workers to keep making positive changes on all leveConsider this familiar scenario:

A team from headquarters has assessed a production facility's maintenance department and has a goal to bring all facilities in line with a comprehensive set of practices, procedures, and outcomes developed from industry benchmarks and current best practices.

Implementing significant process improvement in an organization, however, is difficult because changing people's work behavior in very specific ways is not easy. Literature on change management suggests up to 70% of all change initiatives fail.

The dos and don’ts of change

Those wanting to make a change in their organizations should consider the following tips:

Here are some dos and don’ts for organizations that want to implement change that sticks:


Don't allow politics and conflicting organizational issues to get in the way of implementing these changes. The implementation team should be working with area managers to counter these potential distractions.

Don't ignore the potential impact of a constantly changing management team if this happens to be the case for your organization. Offset this challenge with continuity that is established by written procedures, established routines, process champions, and "tribal knowledge" that is held within the workforce.

Don't confuse the organization with new names for well-known concepts. Change only what is necessary and leave the rest as a familiar context for the new ones.


Define in specific and measurable terms the desired outcomes of the planned implementation. Measure and communicate progress against these terms on a regular basis to everyone involved.

Make sure there is active, visible executive sponsorship or senior management support. Meaningful change in an entrenched culture is never easy. All levels of management have to be on board and rowing in the same direction. Senior management had to walk the walk just like everyone else.

Change should be mandated. When management commits to a change, the message must be that the change is not an option. There cannot be any misunderstanding. When people have the option not to change, they usually won't.

Appoint an effective change champion in the organization to support the change agents and the employees as they work through the implementation.

Create and follow a formal approach to planning and managing change. An unstructured approach will produce unsustainable and inconsistent results.

Get employees involved early in the change process so they have a chance to take ownership. Employees should be asked for their input when planning the change and they should be involved in determining the means. Management should ask for the employees' help in identifying the best way to make the changes happen.

Assign a dedicated implementation team of skilled change agents for the implementation duration if the process is going to be done entirely in-house. the success of change programs depends on the quality of the implementation teams. Free up the best staff for this task while ensuring that day-to-day operations don't suffer. If that isn't an option, get outside help from consultants or other resources within the company.

Understand the risks of in-house implementation. Day-to-day work demands may conflict with the effort, especially if the implementation team still has their original jobs to do. Without the proper approach, the organization risks breaking into factions "for and "against" the new changes. If this happens, the objective may switch from attaining the original goal to surviving the interpersonal and inter-departmental battles. That ends up damaging the culture and perhaps even company performance.

Institutionalize the change to make it the "[company name] way." This helps overcome any "flavor of the month" objections and make it easier for employees to get on board with the initiative.

Implement a process for continually testing the effect of the new behavior using the department's key performance indicators (KPIs) with employee feedback. This leads to a naturally continuous improvement program that fine tunes processes and procedures to help create and sustain new improvements.

Remember that reliability and maintenance improvement is a continuous process with no end point. It is not a fixed program with a hard stop at the end.

When organization change initiatives such as a maintenance improvement project fail, they make the next improvement effort more difficult because employees may feel betrayed or skeptical of management's ability to effect positive change. Getting it right is critical, which is why so many managers get anxious about making process improvement changes.

Change takes time. Large-scale changes within maintenance organizations can take a year or more. Give employees sufficient time to adapt and take ownership of the new work process. The more entrenched the culture and/or the more significant the planned change, the greater the need for all levels of management to act together to support implementation.

Steve Mueller is director of commercial operations for Daniel Penn Associates, LLC (DPALLC). He is responsible for project development, management, and delivery of results for the company's private sector and has over 30 years of consulting experience. Edited by Chris Vavra, production editor, CFE Media,

The Top Plant program honors outstanding manufacturing facilities in North America. View the 2015 Top Plant.
The Product of the Year program recognizes products newly released in the manufacturing industries.
Each year, a panel of Control Engineering and Plant Engineering editors and industry expert judges select the System Integrator of the Year Award winners in three categories.
Doubling down on digital manufacturing; Data driving predictive maintenance; Electric motors and generators; Rewarding operational improvement
2017 Lubrication Guide; Software tools; Microgrids and energy strategies; Use robots effectively
Prescriptive maintenance; Hannover Messe 2017 recap; Reduce welding errors
The cloud, mobility, and remote operations; SCADA and contextual mobility; Custom UPS empowering a secure pipeline
Infrastructure for natural gas expansion; Artificial lift methods; Disruptive technology and fugitive gas emissions
Mobility as the means to offshore innovation; Preventing another Deepwater Horizon; ROVs as subsea robots; SCADA and the radio spectrum
Research team developing Tesla coil designs; Implementing wireless process sensing
Commissioning electrical systems; Designing emergency and standby generator systems; Paralleling switchgear generator systems
Natural gas engines; New applications for fuel cells; Large engines become more efficient; Extending boiler life

Annual Salary Survey

Before the calendar turned, 2016 already had the makings of a pivotal year for manufacturing, and for the world.

There were the big events for the year, including the United States as Partner Country at Hannover Messe in April and the 2016 International Manufacturing Technology Show in Chicago in September. There's also the matter of the U.S. presidential elections in November, which promise to shape policy in manufacturing for years to come.

But the year started with global economic turmoil, as a slowdown in Chinese manufacturing triggered a worldwide stock hiccup that sent values plummeting. The continued plunge in world oil prices has resulted in a slowdown in exploration and, by extension, the manufacture of exploration equipment.

Read more: 2015 Salary Survey

Maintenance and reliability tips and best practices from the maintenance and reliability coaches at Allied Reliability Group.
The One Voice for Manufacturing blog reports on federal public policy issues impacting the manufacturing sector. One Voice is a joint effort by the National Tooling and Machining...
The Society for Maintenance and Reliability Professionals an organization devoted...
Join this ongoing discussion of machine guarding topics, including solutions assessments, regulatory compliance, gap analysis...
IMS Research, recently acquired by IHS Inc., is a leading independent supplier of market research and consultancy to the global electronics industry.
Maintenance is not optional in manufacturing. It’s a profit center, driving productivity and uptime while reducing overall repair costs.
The Lachance on CMMS blog is about current maintenance topics. Blogger Paul Lachance is president and chief technology officer for Smartware Group.
The maintenance journey has been a long, slow trek for most manufacturers and has gone from preventive maintenance to predictive maintenance.
Featured articles highlight technologies that enable the Industrial Internet of Things, IIoT-related products and strategies to get data more easily to the user.
This digital report will explore several aspects of how IIoT will transform manufacturing in the coming years.
Maintenance Manager; California Oils Corp.
Associate, Electrical Engineering; Wood Harbinger
Control Systems Engineer; Robert Bosch Corp.
This course focuses on climate analysis, appropriateness of cooling system selection, and combining cooling systems.
This course will help identify and reveal electrical hazards and identify the solutions to implementing and maintaining a safe work environment.
This course explains how maintaining power and communication systems through emergency power-generation systems is critical.
click me