Don't mistake power-supply MTBF for life expectancy
For machine system designers needing to evaluate which power supplies will best fit a specific machine design or application, it's standard practice to compare each unit's mean time between failures (MTBF) rating. Most people believe that MTBF is the number of operating hours that will elapse before a unit fails.
For machine system designers needing to evaluate which power supplies will best fit a specific machine design or application, it's standard practice to compare each unit's mean time between failures (MTBF) rating. Most people believe that MTBF is the number of operating hours that will elapse before a unit fails. In reality, MTBF is the total functional life of a system component divided by the number of failures - a measurement of reliability.
Examining reliability of a power supply is important because the MTBF can have a significant impact on overall system performance and efficiency. Yet, engineers and designers often make the mistake of assuming that MTBF can automatically be equated with a unit's life expectancy.
In reality, there is no direct correlation between MTBF and the actual operating life of a product. In fact, it's possible to find a power supply with extremely high MTBF but very low operating life span, depending on the types of components used and actual operating conditions.
The expected life of a power supply is often misunderstood, because operating life can be affected by many factors such as the average load rate, vibration and ambient temperature. A power supply's MTBF also is closely linked to the quality and life of a unit's internal electrolytic capacitors - the devices that store energy and filter out electrical variations.
Realistic picture of life expectancy
To get a better idea of the actual life span of a power supply, engineers and system designers evaluating different options examine which method the manufacturer uses to create its MTBF ratings. It's important to find out, for example, whether or not the power supply was rated at its full load.
Most manufacturers today rely on one of two standards to determine MTBF ratings: the Siemens-norm SN 29500 and the MIL-HDBK-217F prediction method. Because factors such as temperature and power load can have such a dramatic impact on capacitor life span, the SN 29500 can be particularly helpful for evaluating MTBF rating. The SN 29500 method takes into account the following key factors:
The number of components in a given design
The full power load that each component will carry
Actual operating temperature.
Component rating - a measure of how much voltage the unit can safely handle
Operating temperature - the hotter the operating conditions, the shorter the life
Size of capacitor - in general, the larger a capacitor's diameter, the longer the life.
Temperature and life span
To ensure the best possible MTBF, system engineers should look for power supply products that have been tested in a manner that fits with how the products will actually be used. For example, some manufacturers now test power supplies under replicated, customer-application conditions to accurately predict the life span of a power supply.
Heat generated by system components can significantly affect a power supply's life span. In fact, studies show that the life of a capacitor reduces 50 percent for every 10 degrees Celsius (50 degrees Fahrenheit). Some manufacturers are now using advanced testing methods in which thermocouples measure heat locally at each capacitor within a power supply.
Such measurements help the manufacturer calculate how long capacitors can function at different operating temperatures. In general, the higher the operating temperature of the equipment, the shorter its life expectancy is - depending on the type and size of capacitor.
Armed with a more complete range of data and life-span estimates, system designers can work to create applications and manufacturing environments designed to provide long-term reliability and efficiency. Such steps provide a more accurate look at MTBF and its true relationship to both product life span and system uptime.
<table ID = 'id3008831-0-table' CELLSPACING = '0' CELLPADDING = '2' WIDTH = '100%' BORDER = '0'><tbody ID = 'id3003156-0-tbody'><tr ID = 'id3001708-0-tr'><td ID = 'id3001871-0-td' CLASS = 'table' STYLE = 'background-color: #EEEEEE'> Author Information </td></tr><tr ID = 'id3008822-3-tr'><td ID = 'id3001864-3-td' CLASS = 'table'> Victoria Alia is a Product Manager for power supply products at Rockwell Automation, IEC Logic Components, in Milwaukee, WI. She has worked for Rockwell Automation for more than 10 years, with positions in marketing, new product development and application engineering. Victoria holds a BS in Industrial Engineering and an MBA. </td></tr></tbody></table>
MTBF ratings generally assume perfect manufacturing conditions and proper application of product - key factors that can drastically offset MTBF numbers. A better way to measure the MTBF of power supplies is to take a closer look at the electrolytic capacitors used in the product. Capacitors have a wear-out mechanism, meaning they generally have a limited life, and this can affect the power supply life span.
How long an electrolytic capacitor will last generally depends on three key factors:
- Events & Awards
- Magazine Archives
- Oil & Gas Engineering
- Salary Survey
- Digital Reports
Annual Salary Survey
Before the calendar turned, 2016 already had the makings of a pivotal year for manufacturing, and for the world.
There were the big events for the year, including the United States as Partner Country at Hannover Messe in April and the 2016 International Manufacturing Technology Show in Chicago in September. There's also the matter of the U.S. presidential elections in November, which promise to shape policy in manufacturing for years to come.
But the year started with global economic turmoil, as a slowdown in Chinese manufacturing triggered a worldwide stock hiccup that sent values plummeting. The continued plunge in world oil prices has resulted in a slowdown in exploration and, by extension, the manufacture of exploration equipment.
Read more: 2015 Salary Survey