Does "Performance Level" Really Replace "Category" For Machine Safety In The U.S.?

Over the next ten years picture a safety circuit with six safety certified components and four are certified to Performance Level (PLx) and the other two are certified to Cat.x! Is the outcome clear?


Over the next ten years picture a safety circuit with six safety certified components and four are certified to Performance Level (PLx) and the other two are certified to Cat.x! Is the outcome clear?

True, the European Machinery Directive has ruled that EN 954-1; 1996 will be fully replaced in December, 2011 by EN/ISO 13849-1; 2008. Therefore, the Category system is being replaced by the Performance Level system of hazard determination and mitigation. Ah, but you say – Categories are still covered in EN/ISO 13849-1; 2008 as a part of the PL analysis so are Categories really a thing of the past here in the U.S.?

First, the U.S. never adopted EN 954-1; 1996 as a normative/required compliance standard. In fact, ANSI’s Accredited Standards Committee has ruled that European standards will not be normatively referenced as a required compliance standard in the U.S.  Therefore, whether it’s an active standard or not in Europe is superfluous to the question. In reality, only pieces of EN 954-1; 1996 were written into U.S. standards, such as Categories. With that said, Categories are now a part of U.S. standards, are they not?

Secondly, I’m told by many Europeans that EN/ISO 13849-1; 2008 (as a part of the Machinery Directive) is primarily focused at the machinery manufacturer for designing and manufacturing machines. Yet in the U.S., OSHA is primarily focused at the end users in industry and our consensus standards reinforce OSHA but are also applied to the OEM and engineering firms building and retrofitting machines for end users. Do we have a focus discrepancy between ourselves and our European colleagues?

Thirdly, global safety component and automation manufacturers/suppliers are already transitioning their product safety certifications from SIL per IEC 61508 and Cat per EN 954 to SIL per IEC 61508 and PL per EN/ISO 13849-1. In my opinion, this transition in certifications will aggravate the situation in the U.S. because there isn’t a mandate to move from Cat to PL. So,  over the next ten years picture a safety circuit with six safety certified components and four are certified to Performance Level (PLx) and the other two are certified to Cat.x!

Has the hazard been fully mitigated to the intended and acceptable level?

Submit your ideas, experiences, and challenges on this subject in the comments section below.  Click on the following text if you don't see a comments box, then scroll down: Does “Performance Level” Really Replace “Category” For Machine Safety In The U.S.?

Related articles:

Trouble Implementing ISO 13849-1; 2006 per the European Machinery Directive


EN 954-1: 1996 - Five Years Of Cessation

EN ISO 13849-1; 2006 - Are We Ready? 

It's Official - EN 954-1:1996 Is Extended By The EU


Contact: for “Solutions for Machine Safety”.

No comments
The Top Plant program honors outstanding manufacturing facilities in North America. View the 2013 Top Plant.
The Product of the Year program recognizes products newly released in the manufacturing industries.
The Engineering Leaders Under 40 program identifies and gives recognition to young engineers who...
A cool solution: Collaboration, chemistry leads to foundry coat product development; See the 2015 Product of the Year Finalists
Raising the standard: What's new with NFPA 70E; A global view of manufacturing; Maintenance data; Fit bearings properly
Sister act: Building on their father's legacy, a new generation moves Bales Metal Surface Solutions forward; Meet the 2015 Engineering Leaders Under 40
Cyber security cost-efficient for industrial control systems; Extracting full value from operational data; Managing cyber security risks
Drilling for Big Data: Managing the flow of information; Big data drilldown series: Challenge and opportunity; OT to IT: Creating a circle of improvement; Industry loses best workers, again
Pipeline vulnerabilities? Securing hydrocarbon transit; Predictive analytics hit the mainstream; Dirty pipelines decrease flow, production—pig your line; Ensuring pipeline physical and cyber security
Upgrading secondary control systems; Keeping enclosures conditioned; Diagnostics increase equipment uptime; Mechatronics simplifies machine design
Designing positive-energy buildings; Ensuring power quality; Complying with NFPA 110; Minimizing arc flash hazards
Building high availability into industrial computers; Of key metrics and myth busting; The truth about five common VFD myths

Annual Salary Survey

After almost a decade of uncertainty, the confidence of plant floor managers is soaring. Even with a number of challenges and while implementing new technologies, there is a renewed sense of optimism among plant managers about their business and their future.

The respondents to the 2014 Plant Engineering Salary Survey come from throughout the U.S. and serve a variety of industries, but they are uniform in their optimism about manufacturing. This year’s survey found 79% consider manufacturing a secure career. That’s up from 75% in 2013 and significantly higher than the 63% figure when Plant Engineering first started asking that question a decade ago.

Read more: 2014 Salary Survey: Confidence rises amid the challenges

Maintenance and reliability tips and best practices from the maintenance and reliability coaches at Allied Reliability Group.
The One Voice for Manufacturing blog reports on federal public policy issues impacting the manufacturing sector. One Voice is a joint effort by the National Tooling and Machining...
The Society for Maintenance and Reliability Professionals an organization devoted...
Join this ongoing discussion of machine guarding topics, including solutions assessments, regulatory compliance, gap analysis...
IMS Research, recently acquired by IHS Inc., is a leading independent supplier of market research and consultancy to the global electronics industry.
Maintenance is not optional in manufacturing. It’s a profit center, driving productivity and uptime while reducing overall repair costs.
The Lachance on CMMS blog is about current maintenance topics. Blogger Paul Lachance is president and chief technology officer for Smartware Group.