SEARCH Archives
Loading
Sponsored by:

Dennis Brandl: How to fold an IT project

Manufacturing IT projects contain more than just software. Knowing how to salvage manufacturing IT project components is key for intellectual capital preservation.

10/08/2009


It's important to know when to fold a manufacturing IT project, but it is equally important to know what to do when you fold a project. Many manufacturing IT projects do not finish, not necessarily because they failed, but because of changing requirements, changing business conditions, company mergers, or changes in products and processes.

A manufacturing IT project contains more than just software. Any project, whether it's a PLC program, DCS program, MES system, SCADA system, HMI system, integration project, or a combination of these, will have: requirements, designs, test plans, test cases, common libraries, documentation and coding standards, and other project artifacts. The project artifacts still have value because they represent the intellectual capital invested in the project that can be captured and made available for future projects.

Typically, most project artifacts are kept only on desktop systems. At some stage in the project, these artifacts are copied to the target system or to a configuration management system. This is a risky approach because information will then be lost when the project is stopped. This is especially true if the project work is performed by contractors. As they will start looking for the next consulting opportunity once the announcement is made that the project is cancelled. Getting their attention and time to correctly document and save all of their work will be difficult, if even possible. For many projects, once the announcement is made, all outside contractors will be off the site by the end of the day.

The best rule for any project is to capture all project artifacts in common storage and, if possible, place the artifacts in a controlled configuration management system. If you are following the approach of engineers and programmers working in a local sandbox with daily check-in of work and multiple shared versions (daily build, distributed beta, final test, and final build), then you will have all of the artifacts captured.

Capturing folded project artifacts allows you to reuse those artifacts on future projects. For example, most requirements are well reviewed and agreed-to documents and these requirements may still be valid on the next project. Many of the non-functional requirements, such as performance, up-time, and security, may not significantly change from project to project.

Other examples of reusable artifacts include: error handling methods, event logging methods, standard HMI faceplates, standard control module elements (PLC or DCS code), standard interfaces, test strategies, test frameworks, test cases, and standard templates for requirements, code, and tests. Each of these artifacts may have their own requirements, design documents, and code. These documents should be added to a knowledge base and made available to future project teams.

Another important action to take when stopping a project is to generate a set of lessons learned documents. Each document should define a single aspect of the project and if it was completed above, at, or below expectations.

When something worked really well, identify the participants so they can be called in on future projects to share their knowledge. When something did not work, don't identify the participants because the goal of the documents is not to assign blame. Instead when identifying something that did not work, document why it didn't work, what the early symptoms were, and what could be tried instead.

In poker it's important to know when to hold 'em and know when to fold 'em. For manufacturing IT projects, it's also important to know how to fold 'em.

Author information : Dennis Brandl is president of BR&L Consulting in Cary, NC, www.brlconsulting.com. His firm focuses on manufacturing IT. Contact Dennis at dbrandl@brlconsulting.com.

 





No comments
The Top Plant program honors outstanding manufacturing facilities in North America. The 2012 Top Plant winners have been named.
In 2012, Plant Engineering's Product of the Year program will celebrated its 25th anniversary. Read about the 2012 winners and nominate for 2013.
The Leaders Under 40 program features outstanding young people who are making a difference in manufacturing. View the 2012 Leaders here.
Find the fake! Counterfeit electrical equipment a clear and present danger
Investment in excellence: One plant's improved productivity and quality was repaid when their company expanded the facility
Strategic uptime, Increased capacity goes right to the bottom line
Case Study Database

Case Study Database

Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Plant Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.

These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.

Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.

Alarm management tips, Power management, Building automation
Estimating data center PUE, Design tips for cost savings, Networked controls, NFPA 70E
Attacking Energy Costs: Strategies for showing financial return on energy management investments

2012 Salary Survey

In a year when manufacturing continued to lead the economic rebound, it makes sense that plant manager bonuses rebounded. Plant Engineering’s annual Salary Survey shows both wages and bonuses rose in 2012 after a retreat the year before.

Average salary across all job titles for plant floor management rose 3.5% to $95,446, and bonus compensation jumped to $15,162, a 4.2% increase from the 2010 level and double the 2011 total, which showed a sharp drop in bonus.

2012 Salary Survey Analysis

2012 Salary Survey Results


Poll of the Week

What category most helps you select new products?
Recommendation from colleagues
Product of the Year winners
Supplier information
Trade show visit


Click Here for Poll Archives
Sponsored by:

About Us | Contact Us | Advertise | Subscribe to Magazine | Site Map | Privacy Policy
Home | Channels | New Products | Media Library | Connect | Industry News | Events and Awards | Newsletters | Blogs | Magazine
Control Engineering | Plant Engineering | Consulting-Specifying Engineer
All content copyright © 2010-2013 CFE Media. All rights reserved.