Data center design: Energy efficiency

In the information age, data centers are one of the most critical components of a facility. If the data center isn’t reliable, business can’t be done. Energy efficiency and sustainability are key components.

01/27/2014


Kevin V. Dickens, PE, LEED BD+C, Mission critical design principal, Jacobs Engineering, St. Louis. Courtesy: Jacobs Engineering Terrence J. Gillick, President, Primary Integration Solutions Inc., Charlotte, N.C. Courtesy: Primary Integration SolutionsBill Kosik, PE, CEM, BEMP, LEED AP BD+C , Principal data center energy technologist, HP Technology Services, Chicago. Courtesy: HP Technology ServicesKeith Lane, PE, RCDD, NTS, RTPM, LC, LEED AP BD+C, President/CEO, Lane Coburn & Associates LLC, Bothell, Wash. Courtesy: Lane Coburn & AssociatesDavid E. Wesemann, PE, LEED AP, ATD, President, Spectrum Engineers Inc., Salt Lake City. Courtesy: Spectrum Engineers Inc.

Respondents


CSE: According to a recent poll conducted by Consulting-Specifying Engineer, the energy efficiency and sustainability requirements within a data center were the most complex issue. Do you agree? Why or why not?

Gillick: I agree. The operating costs of data centers are significant, so even the smallest gain in energy efficiency—even a 1% or 2% reduction in annual utility costs—yields significant savings. All the low-hanging fruit has been picked, and it’s becoming increasingly difficult and more costly to achieve those incremental reductions. Owners are analyzing the age and projected end-of-life of their capital systems and considering the benefits and costs of upgrades. 

Kosik: Maybe five years ago it was complex. With new products and standards as well as a better baseline understanding of energy and sustainability by our clients, we have been able to really push the envelope in coming up with novel design schemes.

Wesemann: I think it’s the issue that presents the most opportunities—solving challenges is the fun part of engineering. Manufacturers and engineers alike seem to be on board in developing new products and ideas to become more efficient.

Lane: Yes, new designs are driven by increases in efficiency. But, the key point is to increase efficiency without losing system reliability. One failure in a large data center can cost millions of dollars—far more than any savings from energy efficiency.

Dickens: Agree. The problem is that current sustainability and energy standards are aimed at buildings that are built for people, not process, and we have historically treated data centers as people buildings because of where they were and how they looked. Unfortunately, no clarity is on the horizon as ASHRAE concurrently tweaks Standard 90.1 to address data centers, and develops a new Standard 90.4P that will be specific to data centers. Doesn’t the fact that they are creating a new standard indict the current standard? What does a designer do in the mean time? That’s complex to say the least. 

CSE: With changing awareness of sustainability issues and increased number of products, has working on sustainable data centers become easier or more challenging?

Wesemann: The availability of products has definitely made it easier to select from more possibilities to meet energy-efficiency goals. As the newer products are implemented and get a track record, results (good or bad) can be shared in the industry, which helps everyone improve the next data center. 

Dickens: Both. The issue is easier to approach because the entire project team is aware of the challenge and in turn all can pull in the same direction with equal strength. But the products that we have at our disposal—the tools to measure success—are flawed and inappropriate for the application at hand. LEED v4 and the current version of ASHRAE 90.1 are tools that have been repurposed, but their adaptation is not consistently applicable. That’s why the goal should be to develop and use mission-centric goals and metrics instead of getting caught up in chasing plaques for the lobby. 

Kosik: It will always be challenging, no matter what. The challenge just shifts. Like right now, we are seeing clients requiring guaranteed PUE and energy performance. This ultimately becomes more of a financial and legal challenge than an engineering one, but it is a good demonstration of how energy efficiency is transforming the data center market from purely reliability-centered to energy efficiency and reliability focused.

Gillick: It has become more challenging—increasing the complexity of design review and lifecycle cost analysis, as well as the challenges associated with the integration, testing, and commissioning of the increasingly complex control systems for energy-efficient components, such as air-side economizer, photovoltaic, fuel cell, thermal storage, fuel oil, grey water, and mechanical systems. For example, it is not uncommon to defer testing and commissioning of the air-side economizer system for several months until outside air temperatures allow.

CSE: The U.S. Green Building Council recently released LEED v4, which includes more detailed information for efficient data centers. How do you think this will help with data center design?

Dickens: As an early adopter and advocate for LEED, I have been disappointed with the glacial pace of the revision process as it pertains to data centers. But we have to understand the challenges faced by the USGBC, especially because data centers are a niche market. Because I haven’t used it yet, I cannot speak to its efficacy, but overall it’s a positive development. There is a fear that the process of checking boxes and counting points may out muscle the intended goal of integrated sustainable design; but that’s a user issue, not a fault of the tool itself.

Gillick: Corporations will continue to seek LEED-certified design and commissioning of data centers, as it demonstrates their commitment to sustainability. However, I don’t anticipate that LEED v4 will make an appreciable difference in the MEP design of Tier III and Tier IV data centers due to their mission critical nature and associated utility requirements.

Wesemann: USGBC’s LEED process is well recognized in the industry as one way to score sustainability. Having data centers now as a category of LEED will most surely result in more discussions about energy efficiency during the design and ultimately lead to more sustainable data centers.

Kosik: Having been deeply involved in the development of the LEED credits written specifically around data centers, I know it will give designers more raw material to get the LEED process started for data centers, and not have to translate the commercial buildings credits so they can be used for data centers. Also, using the LEED rating system in conjunction with the ASHRAE 90.1 energy standard continues to build the industry’s tool kit for data center sustainability and energy efficiency.



No comments
The Top Plant program honors outstanding manufacturing facilities in North America. View the 2013 Top Plant.
The Product of the Year program recognizes products newly released in the manufacturing industries.
The Engineering Leaders Under 40 program identifies and gives recognition to young engineers who...
The true cost of lubrication: Three keys to consider when evaluating oils; Plant Engineering Lubrication Guide; 11 ways to protect bearing assets; Is lubrication part of your KPIs?
Contract maintenance: 5 ways to keep things humming while keeping an eye on costs; Pneumatic systems; Energy monitoring; The sixth 'S' is safety
Transport your data: Supply chain information critical to operational excellence; High-voltage faults; Portable cooling; Safety automation isn't automatic
Case Study Database

Case Study Database

Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Plant Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.

These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.

Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.

Maintaining low data center PUE; Using eco mode in UPS systems; Commissioning electrical and power systems; Exploring dc power distribution alternatives
Synchronizing industrial Ethernet networks; Selecting protocol conversion gateways; Integrating HMIs with PLCs and PACs
Why manufacturers need to see energy in a different light: Current approaches to energy management yield quick savings, but leave plant managers searching for ways of improving on those early gains.

Annual Salary Survey

Participate in the 2013 Salary Survey

In a year when manufacturing continued to lead the economic rebound, it makes sense that plant manager bonuses rebounded. Plant Engineering’s annual Salary Survey shows both wages and bonuses rose in 2012 after a retreat the year before.

Average salary across all job titles for plant floor management rose 3.5% to $95,446, and bonus compensation jumped to $15,162, a 4.2% increase from the 2010 level and double the 2011 total, which showed a sharp drop in bonus.

2012 Salary Survey Analysis

2012 Salary Survey Results

Maintenance and reliability tips and best practices from the maintenance and reliability coaches at Allied Reliability Group.
The One Voice for Manufacturing blog reports on federal public policy issues impacting the manufacturing sector. One Voice is a joint effort by the National Tooling and Machining...
The Society for Maintenance and Reliability Professionals an organization devoted...
Join this ongoing discussion of machine guarding topics, including solutions assessments, regulatory compliance, gap analysis...
IMS Research, recently acquired by IHS Inc., is a leading independent supplier of market research and consultancy to the global electronics industry.
Maintenance is not optional in manufacturing. It’s a profit center, driving productivity and uptime while reducing overall repair costs.
The Lachance on CMMS blog is about current maintenance topics. Blogger Paul Lachance is president and chief technology officer for Smartware Group.