Cycling through fan options

Owning and operating costs, noise, environment, availability, service duty, and power are but a few of the factors engineers need to consider when selecting a fan for a long and efficient life. Matching the best fan selection to use and performance is the primary goal. With new construction, the designer has time to design the air-moving system and select the best fan type for the use.

03/01/2008


Web Extra: Listen to a podcast with the author on this subject. Click here .


Owning and operating costs, noise, environment, availability, service duty, and power are but a few of the factors engineers need to consider when selecting a fan for a long and efficient life.

Matching the best fan selection to use and performance is the primary goal. With new construction, the designer has time to design the air-moving system and select the best fan type for the use. When a fan needs replacing, the schedule may not always allow a new “design” to take place without extensive system downtime.

Table 1 in Chapter 18 of the “2004 ASHRAE Systems and Equipment Handbook” shows different types of fans and fan design characteristics along with performance and usual applications. Fan manufacturers also have selection guidelines to aid in proper fan selection.

Fan service life ranges from 15 years for propeller fans to 25 years for centrifugal fans, according to studies published in Table 4 of Chapter 36 in the “2007 ASHRAE Applications Handbook.” Obviously, factors such as installation, environment, maintenance, and operating conditions affect the service life. In addition to these factors, what other considerations are there in the fan lifecycle selection? Figure 1 shows some items to consider.

Initial costs (owning) and power and maintenance cost (operating) are generally the primary selectors when choosing a fan. For a fan to last 20 years, proper maintenance must be provided, which includes designing adequate installation and maintenance space at new construction. The installation should allow fans to be inspected, disassembled, and greased.

Fans installed with proper duct inlet and outlet connections will lead to higher operating efficiency, less power use, and quieter operation. Fan bearing noise, vibration, and belt condition/slippage are items that should be inspected for regularly in an effective maintenance program.

Where floor space is not available, an inline type fan might be needed. Inline centrifugal fans generally are noisier and require sound attenuators that add to the initial cost life. Maintenance on a suspended fan also may be more difficult due to less-than-desirable access.

The need for flexibility in design, future air volume, and the fan's ability to operate at less than peak air volume (i.e., part-load efficiency) are additional parameters of fan lifecycle selection. The fan laws are mathematical formulas that predict fan performance and power requirements for a series of aerodynamically similar fans based on varying the fan size, fan speed, or air density given the volume or pressure are fixed. The fan laws and explanations for use are available in ASHRAE handbooks and in most manufacturers' fan catalogs. The fan laws also will help identify new performance characteristics of an existing fan to help determine if a more efficient fan of differing size and speed with a better lifecycle cost can be used.

Bigger may be better

Consider a fan operating continuously at 8,760 hours/yr at an energy cost of $0.15/kWh. Airflow is 5,000 cfm at a pressure of 1 in. of water. A manufacturer's catalog for centrifugal utility fan may show a reasonable selection for a 24-in. diameter fan requiring 0.9 bhp at 690 rpm, while a 20-in. diameter fan costing $300 less requires 1.25 bhp at 1,005 rpm.

It would appear that both fans require a 1.5 hp motor, but the larger diameter fan operating at a slower speed will require less power and potentially last longer with fewer bearing problems and operate more quietly, thus making the lifecycle cost more beneficial for the larger diameter fan. Installation and maintenance costs are assumed the same for both fans. The power required includes fan drive losses of 3% to 5%.

The energy cost is calculated by the following method:

number of hours/yr x power (bhp) x 0.746 kW/bhp x dollars/kWh

Using the formula, the energy costs are:

Fan size Energy cost

24 in. $882

20 in. $1,225

Annual savings: $343 (less than 1 year payback).

It is important to consider both the fan and system design when defining the fan lifecycle cost. The operational characteristics may be the driving factor in a long-term scenario, but if the fan cannot be (or is not) properly maintained, the energy performance may not be a factor as the fan may require early replacement. In this case, the fan lifecycle cost is limited to initial cost (owning) and energy cost (operating) for a shorter time period.


Author Information

Banse has spent the past 25 years in healthcare facility design and engineering. He is a member of CSE 's editorial advisory board.




No comments
The Top Plant program honors outstanding manufacturing facilities in North America. View the 2013 Top Plant.
The Product of the Year program recognizes products newly released in the manufacturing industries.
The Engineering Leaders Under 40 program identifies and gives recognition to young engineers who...
The true cost of lubrication: Three keys to consider when evaluating oils; Plant Engineering Lubrication Guide; 11 ways to protect bearing assets; Is lubrication part of your KPIs?
Contract maintenance: 5 ways to keep things humming while keeping an eye on costs; Pneumatic systems; Energy monitoring; The sixth 'S' is safety
Transport your data: Supply chain information critical to operational excellence; High-voltage faults; Portable cooling; Safety automation isn't automatic
Case Study Database

Case Study Database

Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Plant Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.

These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.

Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.

Maintaining low data center PUE; Using eco mode in UPS systems; Commissioning electrical and power systems; Exploring dc power distribution alternatives
Synchronizing industrial Ethernet networks; Selecting protocol conversion gateways; Integrating HMIs with PLCs and PACs
Why manufacturers need to see energy in a different light: Current approaches to energy management yield quick savings, but leave plant managers searching for ways of improving on those early gains.

Annual Salary Survey

Participate in the 2013 Salary Survey

In a year when manufacturing continued to lead the economic rebound, it makes sense that plant manager bonuses rebounded. Plant Engineering’s annual Salary Survey shows both wages and bonuses rose in 2012 after a retreat the year before.

Average salary across all job titles for plant floor management rose 3.5% to $95,446, and bonus compensation jumped to $15,162, a 4.2% increase from the 2010 level and double the 2011 total, which showed a sharp drop in bonus.

2012 Salary Survey Analysis

2012 Salary Survey Results

Maintenance and reliability tips and best practices from the maintenance and reliability coaches at Allied Reliability Group.
The One Voice for Manufacturing blog reports on federal public policy issues impacting the manufacturing sector. One Voice is a joint effort by the National Tooling and Machining...
The Society for Maintenance and Reliability Professionals an organization devoted...
Join this ongoing discussion of machine guarding topics, including solutions assessments, regulatory compliance, gap analysis...
IMS Research, recently acquired by IHS Inc., is a leading independent supplier of market research and consultancy to the global electronics industry.
Maintenance is not optional in manufacturing. It’s a profit center, driving productivity and uptime while reducing overall repair costs.
The Lachance on CMMS blog is about current maintenance topics. Blogger Paul Lachance is president and chief technology officer for Smartware Group.