Cyber Report: Turning off security for speed

Data breaches and cyber attacks are on the rise and one thing is clear: Developing a strong security posture is mission critical. But what about speed?

09/20/2011


IT security personnel within large corporations are shutting off critical functionality in security applications to meet network performance demands for business applications, according to the results of a Crossbeam Systems survey.

This “security for speed” trade-off puts employees, customers, partners and other constituents at risk in order to meet business demands. The survey, which polled 500 network security, IT and C-level executives at global enterprises and service providers across all industry sectors, reveals the extent to which IT personnel are struggling to address the “speed vs. security” trade-off.

“The survey results are another proof-point for what has become a growing issue in the industry — the challenge of managing security performance,” said Chris Christiansen, program vice president, Security Products and Services, IDC. “The findings suggest the problem may be far greater than generally perceived, and it serves as a call to action for IT security personnel to take the time to test their solutions under real-world conditions, hold their security vendors accountable for the performance of their products, and gain a true understanding of their network requirements.”

Ninety percent of respondents admit to making a trade-off between security and throughput performance. Moreover, while a majority of respondents (67 percent) agree if forced to choose, security would trump performance when evaluating a security solution, 81 percent also admit to shutting off functionality in a security product because it was slowing down their network.

Other survey findings reveal major factors driving the security vs. performance challenge, including:

  • IT security personnel are not testing security products under real-world conditions with 42 percent of respondents saying they did not test the security solutions they were evaluating under real-world traffic loads. Among those that did conduct real-world tests, basic security functions such as intrusion prevention capabilities enabled with recommended policies, were not included.
  • Security vendor performance claims are misleading. More than 93 percent of respondents agree security hardware vendor data sheet performance metrics are misleading, with 58 percent affirming they simply do not trust the these performance metrics. The result of this market confusion means more than 60 percent of respondents admit they had to purchase additional hardware for a security solution to address the disparity between what vendors claimed their products could do and reality.
  • IT security personnel do not plan for the long term. Massive growth in data traffic demands, caused in part by the use of smartphones, tablets and other personal mobile devices to share multi-media, high-bandwidth content, is forcing IT personnel to anticipate their performance needs years in advance in order to build scalable and secure networks. Yet, survey results reveal a low number of IT personnel at major corporations are thinking beyond the short term. Just over half (51 percent) report they only evaluate their performance needs less than a year to 24 months in advance.
  • Security products are not getting full optimization. Security products have become more sophisticated and multi-layered in their defenses. While this has helped organizations prevent attacks and protect users, these products have also become more complex to manage. Next-generation firewalls promise to help IT security personnel achieve greater application visibility and control over their networks with a device that integrates functions such as advanced firewalls, intrusion prevention and application-awareness capabilities. However, the reality is most survey respondents are not using the full capabilities of their next generation firewall and are only using the minimum features.

- Edited by Chris Vavra, Plant Engineering, www.plantengineering.com 



No comments
The Top Plant program honors outstanding manufacturing facilities in North America. View the 2013 Top Plant.
The Product of the Year program recognizes products newly released in the manufacturing industries.
The Engineering Leaders Under 40 program identifies and gives recognition to young engineers who...
The true cost of lubrication: Three keys to consider when evaluating oils; Plant Engineering Lubrication Guide; 11 ways to protect bearing assets; Is lubrication part of your KPIs?
Contract maintenance: 5 ways to keep things humming while keeping an eye on costs; Pneumatic systems; Energy monitoring; The sixth 'S' is safety
Transport your data: Supply chain information critical to operational excellence; High-voltage faults; Portable cooling; Safety automation isn't automatic
Case Study Database

Case Study Database

Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Plant Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.

These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.

Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.

Maintaining low data center PUE; Using eco mode in UPS systems; Commissioning electrical and power systems; Exploring dc power distribution alternatives
Synchronizing industrial Ethernet networks; Selecting protocol conversion gateways; Integrating HMIs with PLCs and PACs
Why manufacturers need to see energy in a different light: Current approaches to energy management yield quick savings, but leave plant managers searching for ways of improving on those early gains.

Annual Salary Survey

Participate in the 2013 Salary Survey

In a year when manufacturing continued to lead the economic rebound, it makes sense that plant manager bonuses rebounded. Plant Engineering’s annual Salary Survey shows both wages and bonuses rose in 2012 after a retreat the year before.

Average salary across all job titles for plant floor management rose 3.5% to $95,446, and bonus compensation jumped to $15,162, a 4.2% increase from the 2010 level and double the 2011 total, which showed a sharp drop in bonus.

2012 Salary Survey Analysis

2012 Salary Survey Results

Maintenance and reliability tips and best practices from the maintenance and reliability coaches at Allied Reliability Group.
The One Voice for Manufacturing blog reports on federal public policy issues impacting the manufacturing sector. One Voice is a joint effort by the National Tooling and Machining...
The Society for Maintenance and Reliability Professionals an organization devoted...
Join this ongoing discussion of machine guarding topics, including solutions assessments, regulatory compliance, gap analysis...
IMS Research, recently acquired by IHS Inc., is a leading independent supplier of market research and consultancy to the global electronics industry.
Maintenance is not optional in manufacturing. It’s a profit center, driving productivity and uptime while reducing overall repair costs.
The Lachance on CMMS blog is about current maintenance topics. Blogger Paul Lachance is president and chief technology officer for Smartware Group.