Cross-study comparison of Automation in Packaging study

Packaging equipment manufacturers are a relatively small group doing highly specialized work. Almost every product has different requirements for packaging, and the equipment used to manufacture, fill, seal, convey and pack it. Many packaging projects are totally customized, and processes are becoming increasingly automated.

12/01/2008


Packaging equipment manufacturers are a relatively small group doing highly specialized work. Almost every product has different requirements for packaging, and the equipment used to manufacture, fill, seal, convey and pack it. Many packaging projects are totally customized, and processes are becoming increasingly automated.

Why are the packagers not using all the automation features offered on packaging machinery they have purchased?

OEMs

Integrators

Knowledge level of workforce

77%

78%

Automation features exceed client needs

57%

71%

Features too complicated to operate

39%

47%

Lack of compatibility with existing systems

38%

29%

Packagers understaffed

18%

12%

Not sure

14%

10%

Slows operations

11%

10%


Flexible packaging systems should be better leveraged to improve time to market

Study 1 Packagers

Study 2 OEMs

Study 3 Integrators

Completely agree

40%

38%

67%

Somewhat agree

47%

50%

29%

Somewhat disagree

10%

10%

4%

Completely disagree

3%

2%

0%


Main reasons to automate packaging processes

Study 1 Packagers

Study 2 OEMs

Study 3 Integrators

Multiple choices allowed na = data not available

Control labor costs

81%

77%

80%

Flexibility (handles various sizes/configurations)

45%

na

16%

Gain production efficiencies

74%

52%

55%

Gain competitive edge

49%

28%

29%

Reliability

47%

23%

18%

Machine flexibility (easily changed packaging types)

38%

27%

8%

Machines are outdated, need to be updated

34%

22%

33%

Price

34%

19%

8%

Reduce material waste

na

9%

6%

Energy management

na

6%

16%

Sustainability

34%

11%

6%

Footprint (size of machine)

18%

3%

2%


Which of the following automation and control product features are most important when deciding which components to include or deciding which vendors to use?

Study 1 Packagers

Study 2 OEMs

Study 3 Integrators

Multiple choices allowed na = data not available

Reliability (e.g. performance)

71%

54%

55%

Quality/durability (e.g. long lasting)

63%

33%

39%

Price

61%

42%

18%

Easy to use, install and maintain

57%

31%

31%

Price-to-performance value

52%

35%

45%

Compatibility with existing systems

48%

32%

27%

Long term cost of ownership

41%

14%

18%

Product specifications

35%

19%

24%

Products performed well during in-house testing

37%

16%

4%

Lot tracking/tracing capabilities

na

5%

2%

Enhances speed of line changeover

36%

6%

10%

Scalability

16%

3%

10%

Offers development tools

12%

5%

2%

Other

3%

3%

2%


For other results, also see:

Automation helps packagers: Webcast, research, 3-part article series

.





No comments
The Top Plant program honors outstanding manufacturing facilities in North America. View the 2013 Top Plant.
The Product of the Year program recognizes products newly released in the manufacturing industries.
The Engineering Leaders Under 40 program identifies and gives recognition to young engineers who...
The true cost of lubrication: Three keys to consider when evaluating oils; Plant Engineering Lubrication Guide; 11 ways to protect bearing assets; Is lubrication part of your KPIs?
Contract maintenance: 5 ways to keep things humming while keeping an eye on costs; Pneumatic systems; Energy monitoring; The sixth 'S' is safety
Transport your data: Supply chain information critical to operational excellence; High-voltage faults; Portable cooling; Safety automation isn't automatic
Case Study Database

Case Study Database

Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Plant Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.

These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.

Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.

Maintaining low data center PUE; Using eco mode in UPS systems; Commissioning electrical and power systems; Exploring dc power distribution alternatives
Synchronizing industrial Ethernet networks; Selecting protocol conversion gateways; Integrating HMIs with PLCs and PACs
Why manufacturers need to see energy in a different light: Current approaches to energy management yield quick savings, but leave plant managers searching for ways of improving on those early gains.

Annual Salary Survey

Participate in the 2013 Salary Survey

In a year when manufacturing continued to lead the economic rebound, it makes sense that plant manager bonuses rebounded. Plant Engineering’s annual Salary Survey shows both wages and bonuses rose in 2012 after a retreat the year before.

Average salary across all job titles for plant floor management rose 3.5% to $95,446, and bonus compensation jumped to $15,162, a 4.2% increase from the 2010 level and double the 2011 total, which showed a sharp drop in bonus.

2012 Salary Survey Analysis

2012 Salary Survey Results

Maintenance and reliability tips and best practices from the maintenance and reliability coaches at Allied Reliability Group.
The One Voice for Manufacturing blog reports on federal public policy issues impacting the manufacturing sector. One Voice is a joint effort by the National Tooling and Machining...
The Society for Maintenance and Reliability Professionals an organization devoted...
Join this ongoing discussion of machine guarding topics, including solutions assessments, regulatory compliance, gap analysis...
IMS Research, recently acquired by IHS Inc., is a leading independent supplier of market research and consultancy to the global electronics industry.
Maintenance is not optional in manufacturing. It’s a profit center, driving productivity and uptime while reducing overall repair costs.
The Lachance on CMMS blog is about current maintenance topics. Blogger Paul Lachance is president and chief technology officer for Smartware Group.