Creative financing for energy management projects
VSDs and industrial motors
VSDs optimize the voltage and frequency input into an industrial motor to change its speed of operation, rather than the traditional method of “choking” constant speed motors. This greatly reduces consumption of electricity. Correctly designed VSD systems typically reduce energy consumption by up to 70%, depending on the application. The most receptive applications tend to be pumps, fans, and centrifugal compressors, although worthwhile savings may even be achieved on more demanding applications such as mixers, centrifuges, reciprocating compressors, and extruders.
In addition to providing substantial energy reduction, other VSD benefits include soft start-up of the equipment, reduced current on starting, reduced mechanical stress, and high power factor. VSDs are intelligent devices that can easily be integrated into energy management systems, and may also be a key component in dynamic power management by helping with rate management and demand reduction. Figures 2 and 3 show potential financial advantages of deploying VSDs—and using alternative financing methods for their purchase.
The gains to be made from installing VSDs should not be confused with the process of installing motors, which themselves are more energy efficient. Both activities—installing VSDs and replacing inefficient motors with more energy efficient models—will yield energy cost savings.
As far as industrial electric motors are concerned, legislative efforts have been underway in several countries for more than a decade to encourage the transition to more efficient electric motor driven systems. These include the implementation of Minimum Energy Performance Standards (MEPS) requiring that electric motors meet a certain efficiency level to enter the national market.
Governments have clear incentives for implementing these policies. Electric motor systems use approximately 40% of total global electricity, and their share in industrial electricity consumption is much higher, standing at 65% according to the International Energy Agency.
With the global cost of electricity on the rise, any equipment that results in energy savings constitutes a valuable investment. The case for energy efficiency becomes all the more compelling in the light of the fact that more than 95% of the lifetime cost of an industrial motor is the cost of the electricity it consumes.
Implementing VSDs in appropriate processes offers greater energy savings than simply upgrading to more energy efficient motors. Moreover, the full energy and cost-saving potential of VSDs is a long way from being realized. Globally, the penetration of VSDs (as a proportion of installed motors) is still low. Information in this area is limited, but evidence indicates that the highest levels have been achieved in the U.S., at nearly 20%. The UK and China are at a mere 10%, and figures suggest Europe stands at no higher than 15%. However, in Germany estimates show that 30% of industrial electric motors are currently sold with a VSD.
Quantifying savings from greater VSD implementation
In order to give an idea, country by country, of the level to which greater implementation of VSDs could offer cost savings to industry, Siemens has drawn on its data sources and customer experiences to create a financial model.
All aspects of this model are designed to be cautious and conservative, at each stage choosing the lower end of reported experiences to ensure that the resulting estimates are likely to understate the situation rather than exaggerate it.
The starting point is industrial energy consumption for the 10 countries studied. This number is published by a number of official sources, as is pricing for industrial electricity. The most complete, verified dataset for industrial electricity prices and consumption across these 10 countries is for 2010. Therefore, this data has been used for the model, factoring out escalating factors such as increased consumption and rising prices. This is the first point at which the model introduces a note of careful conservatism.
Next, a number of sources testify that, throughout the world, over 60% of industrial electricity is used to drive electric motors. However, in the countries studied, between 10% and 20% of industrial motors are controlled through a VSD. Therefore, industrial energy consumption must be reduced by this proportion, which is already energy efficient.
In addition, not all motors are applied to variable speed processes (i.e., where the motors do not run at constant speed all the time). Sources testify that at least 50% of industrial processes would benefit from variable speed drives, and that the proportion could be nearer 70%. The lower of these numbers has been used in the model.
Finally, what level of energy efficiency gains do VSDs typically enable, and how much can electricity costs be reduced? Most sources cite a range between 20% and 70%, depending upon the application. To ensure the model generates a conservative estimate, a low average savings level of 25% was used.
When this highly conservative model is applied to industrial electricity consumption in the 10 countries studied—USA, UK, France, Germany, Spain, Poland, Turkey, Russia, India, and China—the numbers shown in Figure 4 are revealed.
This is a careful estimate of the amount of money that industrial enterprises will potentially waste over the next five years, as a direct result of not implementing VSDs on all appropriate industrial processes.
The projected sums for the potential energy cost savings to be gained from full implementation of VSDs in industrial enterprises serve to illustrate what could be gained from just one of many possible energy efficiency initiatives that industrial enterprises adopt.
Appropriate financing arrangements are now available for industrial companies to employ. These financing tools provide an alternative to standard bank borrowing, offset equipment investment costs against energy cost savings, and effectively offer businesses a zero-net-cost method of acquiring energy efficient equipment. This not only saves on energy costs, but is often more productive than the equipment it replaces, and is less expensive to maintain and service than previous generation technology.
It appears that, with innovative financing methods now widely available, the outlook for energy efficiency investment is positive.
This article is an excerpt from a whitepaper titled “Turn Down the Power” written by Siemens Financial Services. Edited by Sidney Hill, Jr., contributing content specialist, CFE Media. For more information, visit finance.siemens.com.
Send IEM comments to controleng(at)cfemedia.com
This article is part of the Industrial Energy Management supplement for CFE Media publications.
See the links at the bottom of this article to read other articles in this supplement.
Case Study Database
Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Plant Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.
These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.
Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.
Annual Salary Survey
In a year when manufacturing continued to lead the economic rebound, it makes sense that plant manager bonuses rebounded. Plant Engineering’s annual Salary Survey shows both wages and bonuses rose in 2012 after a retreat the year before.
Average salary across all job titles for plant floor management rose 3.5% to $95,446, and bonus compensation jumped to $15,162, a 4.2% increase from the 2010 level and double the 2011 total, which showed a sharp drop in bonus.