Control system mounting options

In any machine control design, the designer is faced with choices regarding the mounting of individual components. Mounting options can be broken down into several basic categories: wall-mount, rail-mount, panel-mount, rack-mount, or cage-mount. Each type of mounting has unique attributes that designers must consider.

11/01/2008


In any machine control design, the designer is faced with choices regarding the mounting of individual components. Mounting options can be broken down into several basic categories: wall-mount, rail-mount, panel-mount, rack-mount, or cage-mount. Each type of mounting has unique attributes that designers must consider.

Wall-mounting is the direct attachment of devices to the walls of the control cabinet. Typically, wall-mounting is performed by drilling and tapping holes that match a hole pattern in the package of the device. Screws are then used to secure the device to the wall. Wall-mounting is very flexible, since holes can be drilled and tapped just about anywhere, but it is also labor-intensive, particularly when numerous devices must be mounted.

Rail-mounting is an improvement over wall-mounting. Instead of drilling and tapping holes for each device, holes are drilled and tapped only for the rail. The devices are then clipped onto the rail and can be positioned by sliding along it. The most common rail standard is the 35 mm DIN rail (EN50022)1. Two less widely used sizes are 15 mm (EN 50045) and 7.5 mm (EN50023).

On-machine controls can make use of wall, rail, panet, rack, and cage mounting systems. Source: Siemens Energy and Automation

On-machine controls can make use of wall, rail, panet, rack, and cage mounting systems. Source: Siemens Energy and Automation

Panel-mounting is used when devices must be accessed from outside of the cabinet while the wiring remains inside. Panel-mount devices are typically mounted in rectangular or circular cutouts in the cabinet. Most rectangular panel-mount devices adhere to standard cutout dimensions such as 1/32, 1/16, 1/8, and 1/4 DIN cutouts. Other standards exist for circular cutouts. The principal benefit of panel-mount components is the interface that they provide to the human. The principal drawback is the need to make cutouts in the cabinet.

Rack-mounting is typically used to mount major system components. The most common rack-mount standard is EIA 310-D, which defines the ubiquitous 19-in rack 2. Rack-mounting is frequently used to mount industrial computers and machine controllers. It is also widely used by IT departments to mount network and computing infrastructure components. In scientific applications, rack-mounting is commonly used to mount test equipment. Unsurprisingly, numerous industrial controls can be purchased in rack-mount form factors. Rack-mounting has enjoyed widespread use because it provides a number of benefits including ease of installation/removal and an organized and orderly appearance of the installed components. Its principal drawback is the additional cost of the rack and, in many cases, higher costs for rack-mountable components.

Cage-mounting is the mounting of cards (individual circuit boards or board stacks) within a card cage. The cards slide on rail guides and typically plug into a backplane. When used, a backplane carries both power and signals from one card to the next. Use of a backplane can eliminate a great deal of point-to-point wiring. The card cage itself may be rack, wall, panel, or even rail-mounted. Industry-standard and vendor-specific card cages exist. One of the more common card cage standards is the Eurocard standard (IEEE 1101.10)3.

The principal drawback of cage-mounting is the additional cost of the cage, and backplane. This additional cost is offset by reduced cost of individual modules, which need not include provision for power supplies, cooling airflow, inter-module connections, and protective enclosures. These supporting facilities are provided by the cage. For installations where several modules are needed, the overall installation cost can be lower for cage-mount systems than other solutions.

It is not uncommon for a machine design to use all of the above mounting techniques. How and where to use them depends on design constraints and designer preferences, with the driving factor being component cost, assembly cost, maintainability, availability of components, corporate or industry standards, or even aesthetics.


Author Information

Michael N. Thompson is principal development analyst for The Timken Company. Contact him at michaelthompson@graduatesoftware.com .




No comments
The Top Plant program honors outstanding manufacturing facilities in North America. View the 2015 Top Plant.
The Product of the Year program recognizes products newly released in the manufacturing industries.
The Engineering Leaders Under 40 program identifies and gives recognition to young engineers who...
2015 Top Plant: Phoenix Contact, Middletown, Pa.; 2015 Best Practices: Automation, Electrical Safety, Electrical Systems, Pneumatics, Material Handling, Mechanical Systems
A cool solution: Collaboration, chemistry leads to foundry coat product development; See the 2015 Product of the Year Finalists
Raising the standard: What's new with NFPA 70E; A global view of manufacturing; Maintenance data; Fit bearings properly
Special report: U.S. natural gas; LNG transport technologies evolve to meet market demand; Understanding new methane regulations; Predictive maintenance for gas pipeline compressors
Cyber security cost-efficient for industrial control systems; Extracting full value from operational data; Managing cyber security risks
Drilling for Big Data: Managing the flow of information; Big data drilldown series: Challenge and opportunity; OT to IT: Creating a circle of improvement; Industry loses best workers, again
Migrating industrial networks; Tracking HMI advances; Making the right automation changes
Understanding transfer switch operation; Coordinating protective devices; Analyzing NEC 2014 changes; Cooling data centers
Upgrading secondary control systems; Keeping enclosures conditioned; Diagnostics increase equipment uptime; Mechatronics simplifies machine design

Annual Salary Survey

After almost a decade of uncertainty, the confidence of plant floor managers is soaring. Even with a number of challenges and while implementing new technologies, there is a renewed sense of optimism among plant managers about their business and their future.

The respondents to the 2014 Plant Engineering Salary Survey come from throughout the U.S. and serve a variety of industries, but they are uniform in their optimism about manufacturing. This year’s survey found 79% consider manufacturing a secure career. That’s up from 75% in 2013 and significantly higher than the 63% figure when Plant Engineering first started asking that question a decade ago.

Read more: 2014 Salary Survey: Confidence rises amid the challenges

Maintenance and reliability tips and best practices from the maintenance and reliability coaches at Allied Reliability Group.
The One Voice for Manufacturing blog reports on federal public policy issues impacting the manufacturing sector. One Voice is a joint effort by the National Tooling and Machining...
The Society for Maintenance and Reliability Professionals an organization devoted...
Join this ongoing discussion of machine guarding topics, including solutions assessments, regulatory compliance, gap analysis...
IMS Research, recently acquired by IHS Inc., is a leading independent supplier of market research and consultancy to the global electronics industry.
Maintenance is not optional in manufacturing. It’s a profit center, driving productivity and uptime while reducing overall repair costs.
The Lachance on CMMS blog is about current maintenance topics. Blogger Paul Lachance is president and chief technology officer for Smartware Group.
This article collection contains several articles on the vital role that compressed air plays in manufacturing plants.