Consider third-party involvement when looking to replace CMMS

To make sure the computerized maintenance management system (CMMS) you choose has been thoroughly vetted before you sign the purchase order, consider a reputable third party to put it through a rigorous evaluation process first, in which the product’s capabilities are tested and verified against industry standards.

06/04/2014


Whether you’re shopping for a new maintenance management solution or replacing your incumbent system, there is no shortage of products out there to choose from. You scour the Internet, read product reviews, or ask for a recommendation. Once you’ve completed your search, you narrow down your choices to two or three candidates based on your requirements and sit in on product demonstrations to make your decision. Finally, you choose the winner.

But even after your due diligence, you’re still not home free. Implementation is taking longer than expected; equipment fields don’t match up to your information needs, adding documentation is limited, and your technicians say the system is too complicated and won’t close out their work orders.

To make sure the computerized maintenance management system (CMMS) you choose has been thoroughly vetted before you sign the purchase order, consider a reputable third party to put it through a rigorous evaluation process first, in which the product’s capabilities are tested and verified against industry standards.

Some certification processes require a CMMS vendor to participate in a demanding and time-consuming (with some taking months or longer to complete) evaluation by the software research firm.

One of the leading enterprise software research firms that review CMMS products is an outfit called the Technology Education Center (TEC). TEC analyzes hundreds of vendors and thousands of enterprise software features before narrowing down the worthiest choices for its clients. For CMMS evaluations specifically, TEC analysts review more than 60 product features.

CMMS vendors start the process by filling out detailed evaluation forms and spreadsheets, answering hundreds of questions about the software architecture, user interface and feature sets down to detailed granularity, plus add-on solutions, mobile versions, training and support services, and more. Fundamental to a TEC review is the user interface and whether it lives up to the “ease-of-use” promise for navigating maintenance processes from each screen.

The vendors must demonstrate the CMMS’ inherent functionality for maintenance and inventory management, as well as integration with external processes. They must show the CMMS’ ability to automate real-world business processes chosen by the TEC analyst, and show how its functionality stands up to known CMMS benchmarks.

The vendor might be asked to start by creating a record for a particular asset, including all components and associated serial numbers, define PMs by time and condition-based monitoring, track asset maintenance costs, including planned and unplanned downtime, and run reports showing asset location, maintenance costs, uptime, longevity, and other options.

Analysts look at how easy is it to navigate the CMMS through all maintenance processes, i.e., do all screens have the same look and feel regardless of the process? How easy is it to configure assets, parts, PMs and work orders? Is the product simple enough to use for technicians with less computer experience?

They can look at the CMMS’ work order capabilities, i.e., work order detail, labor time detail, cost, etc., and whether the work order includes a reporting function with tasks flowing around the work order? Do work orders become the central source of information to help maintenance managers make decisions about capital expenditures, team productivity, and contractor costs?

TEC is just one of many software research firms available to maintenance operations teams. But by understanding the research process of a high-quality firm, you may be able to leverage their results, coupled with your own methods, to select the best solution for your maintenance organization.



No comments
The Top Plant program honors outstanding manufacturing facilities in North America. View the 2013 Top Plant.
The Product of the Year program recognizes products newly released in the manufacturing industries.
The Engineering Leaders Under 40 program identifies and gives recognition to young engineers who...
The true cost of lubrication: Three keys to consider when evaluating oils; Plant Engineering Lubrication Guide; 11 ways to protect bearing assets; Is lubrication part of your KPIs?
Contract maintenance: 5 ways to keep things humming while keeping an eye on costs; Pneumatic systems; Energy monitoring; The sixth 'S' is safety
Transport your data: Supply chain information critical to operational excellence; High-voltage faults; Portable cooling; Safety automation isn't automatic
Case Study Database

Case Study Database

Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Plant Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.

These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.

Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.

Maintaining low data center PUE; Using eco mode in UPS systems; Commissioning electrical and power systems; Exploring dc power distribution alternatives
Synchronizing industrial Ethernet networks; Selecting protocol conversion gateways; Integrating HMIs with PLCs and PACs
Why manufacturers need to see energy in a different light: Current approaches to energy management yield quick savings, but leave plant managers searching for ways of improving on those early gains.

Annual Salary Survey

Participate in the 2013 Salary Survey

In a year when manufacturing continued to lead the economic rebound, it makes sense that plant manager bonuses rebounded. Plant Engineering’s annual Salary Survey shows both wages and bonuses rose in 2012 after a retreat the year before.

Average salary across all job titles for plant floor management rose 3.5% to $95,446, and bonus compensation jumped to $15,162, a 4.2% increase from the 2010 level and double the 2011 total, which showed a sharp drop in bonus.

2012 Salary Survey Analysis

2012 Salary Survey Results

Maintenance and reliability tips and best practices from the maintenance and reliability coaches at Allied Reliability Group.
The One Voice for Manufacturing blog reports on federal public policy issues impacting the manufacturing sector. One Voice is a joint effort by the National Tooling and Machining...
The Society for Maintenance and Reliability Professionals an organization devoted...
Join this ongoing discussion of machine guarding topics, including solutions assessments, regulatory compliance, gap analysis...
IMS Research, recently acquired by IHS Inc., is a leading independent supplier of market research and consultancy to the global electronics industry.
Maintenance is not optional in manufacturing. It’s a profit center, driving productivity and uptime while reducing overall repair costs.
The Lachance on CMMS blog is about current maintenance topics. Blogger Paul Lachance is president and chief technology officer for Smartware Group.