Case study: Defining hospital loads

An example of developing the system architecture of the PSG system using a hospital campus project.


When developing the system architecture of the PSG system, it is important to understand the types of loads served and how they are segregated and configured. A hospital campus project will be used as an example of segregating and configuring loads. 

Figure 5: In this hospital example, a PSG system with aggregate generator and load buses is shown. Courtesy: JBA Consulting EngineersThe campus energy center and first four phases were developed by another engineering consultant. The project included a central standby generator system to serve all future phases. Another consulting firm was going through final testing of the system when JBA Consulting Engineers started the design for its phase of the project. There were challenges with the initial sequence of operations and closing the required number of generators onto the PSG generator bus to supply the life safety systems within the code-prescribed 10-sec timeframe.

The configuration of the downstream systems required all of the PSG feeder breakers to close within 10 sec because each radial feeder served several life safety ATSs via unit substations that also served critical, equipment, and optional ATSs. Each of the four radial feeders out of the PSG served, on average, four unit substations each rated at 1500 to 2500 kVA. This amounted to approximately 8 MW of total transformer inrush on the generators when each feeder breaker closed. If all of the generators were synchronized and closed into the bus, this was achievable, but not within the 10-sec requirement. Ten sec was not enough time to include the delays required to keep the generators that were currently synchronized from being subjected to excessive inrush current resulting in generator shutdown to protect them from damage.

Options for modifications to the PSG system were limited. Fortunately, the campus energy center had been provided with unit-mounted battery packs in all egress lighting and all life safety systems included integral battery backup. All of the life safety systems in the energy center were reclassified to the equipment system. The energy center was served entirely by one of the four radial feeders out of the PSG, and reprioritizing the energy center feeder to a lower priority enabled the balance of the system to meet the 10-sec timeframe. 

A more prudent approach for this system would have been an aggregate generator bus and separate load buses. This would have avoided the challenges experienced while also improving system reliability by reducing (and in the best case, eliminating) single points of failure. See Figure 5 for an example configuration. Initially, the system could operate as two separate systems to bring the life safety systems online within 10 sec. As more generators are synchronized and the two separate generator buses close together, the remaining ATSs can transfer load onto the system. With separation for the feeders between separate load buses, the generators are subjected to lower levels of transformer inrush current. 

Robert R. Jones Jr. is an electrical project engineer at JBA Consulting Engineers with more than 10 years of design experience. Jones has experience in market sectors including hospitality, commercial, medical, and government projects. He specializes in medium- and low-voltage distribution systems, emergency/standby power systems, renewable energy design and implementation, circuit analysis calculations, and equipment space planning.

See how generators and transfer switches are used for mission critical facilities below.

No comments
The Top Plant program honors outstanding manufacturing facilities in North America. View the 2013 Top Plant.
The Product of the Year program recognizes products newly released in the manufacturing industries.
The Engineering Leaders Under 40 program identifies and gives recognition to young engineers who...
A cool solution: Collaboration, chemistry leads to foundry coat product development; See the 2015 Product of the Year Finalists
Raising the standard: What's new with NFPA 70E; A global view of manufacturing; Maintenance data; Fit bearings properly
Sister act: Building on their father's legacy, a new generation moves Bales Metal Surface Solutions forward; Meet the 2015 Engineering Leaders Under 40
Cyber security cost-efficient for industrial control systems; Extracting full value from operational data; Managing cyber security risks
Drilling for Big Data: Managing the flow of information; Big data drilldown series: Challenge and opportunity; OT to IT: Creating a circle of improvement; Industry loses best workers, again
Pipeline vulnerabilities? Securing hydrocarbon transit; Predictive analytics hit the mainstream; Dirty pipelines decrease flow, production—pig your line; Ensuring pipeline physical and cyber security
Upgrading secondary control systems; Keeping enclosures conditioned; Diagnostics increase equipment uptime; Mechatronics simplifies machine design
Designing positive-energy buildings; Ensuring power quality; Complying with NFPA 110; Minimizing arc flash hazards
Building high availability into industrial computers; Of key metrics and myth busting; The truth about five common VFD myths

Annual Salary Survey

After almost a decade of uncertainty, the confidence of plant floor managers is soaring. Even with a number of challenges and while implementing new technologies, there is a renewed sense of optimism among plant managers about their business and their future.

The respondents to the 2014 Plant Engineering Salary Survey come from throughout the U.S. and serve a variety of industries, but they are uniform in their optimism about manufacturing. This year’s survey found 79% consider manufacturing a secure career. That’s up from 75% in 2013 and significantly higher than the 63% figure when Plant Engineering first started asking that question a decade ago.

Read more: 2014 Salary Survey: Confidence rises amid the challenges

Maintenance and reliability tips and best practices from the maintenance and reliability coaches at Allied Reliability Group.
The One Voice for Manufacturing blog reports on federal public policy issues impacting the manufacturing sector. One Voice is a joint effort by the National Tooling and Machining...
The Society for Maintenance and Reliability Professionals an organization devoted...
Join this ongoing discussion of machine guarding topics, including solutions assessments, regulatory compliance, gap analysis...
IMS Research, recently acquired by IHS Inc., is a leading independent supplier of market research and consultancy to the global electronics industry.
Maintenance is not optional in manufacturing. It’s a profit center, driving productivity and uptime while reducing overall repair costs.
The Lachance on CMMS blog is about current maintenance topics. Blogger Paul Lachance is president and chief technology officer for Smartware Group.