Cap & trade: as fury begins, truth is elusive
For those not watching things in Congress, MBT blogger Roberto Michel is watching how the debate over the Waxman-Markey energy bill, centered around cap & trade, is evolving. Citing a Wall Street Journal blog from May 2009, he says there is plenty of partisan posturing around the bill. "This legislation matters to manufacturers, especially those in energy-intensive sectors who might exceed ...
For those not watching things in Congress, MBT blogger Roberto Michel is watching how the debate over the Waxman-Markey energy bill, centered around cap & trade, is evolving. Citing a Wall Street Journal blog from May 2009, he says there is plenty of partisan posturing around the bill. "This legislation matters to manufacturers, especially those in energy-intensive sectors who might exceed allowances if they use equipment such as coal-fired furnaces or boilers for their core processes. I've said here before that there would be a big political hubbub over this legislation, but something is likely to pass, given the Democrats' advantage in Congress, and the overall political will for serious change on energy policy."
The political posturing around cap & trade isn't surprising, says Michel. What's more surprising is just how hard it is to sort through the conflicting study results. A Heritage Foundation study cited by some Republican critics of cap & trade says Waxman-Markey would drive jobs from the U.S. economy to the tune of 844,000 per year. However, a study from The Pew Center on Climate Research says energy-intensive manufacturing sectors would face only modest competitive impacts under a cap-and-trade program. The EPA also has its analysis.
"I would tend toward the Pew Center's findings as more objective, but then again, the truth probably lies somewhere in the middle," says Michel. "Keep in mind these studies aren't always based on the same set of assumptions. There is also much political obfuscation going on with study numbers, such as the inaccurate claim that cap & trade amounts to a $3,100 tax on families.
For managers in the trenches, Michel advises monitoring what actually unfolds, and preparing by enhancing your company's ability to track and manage its carbon footprint.
Case Study Database
Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Plant Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.
These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.
Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.
2012 Salary Survey
In a year when manufacturing continued to lead the economic rebound, it makes sense that plant manager bonuses rebounded. Plant Engineering’s annual Salary Survey shows both wages and bonuses rose in 2012 after a retreat the year before.
Average salary across all job titles for plant floor management rose 3.5% to $95,446, and bonus compensation jumped to $15,162, a 4.2% increase from the 2010 level and double the 2011 total, which showed a sharp drop in bonus.