Bring TAB specs in line
For the best test and balance results, perform a specification checkup on each project.
Better test and balance (TAB) results are just a specification away. All too often, TAB specifications are not consistent with project specifics and modern TAB procedures. These disconnects can lead to confusion and frustration for both the design professional and the TAB firm.
When TAB supervisors prepare a price for a balancing project, they review the mechanical drawings, equipment submittals, and the TAB specification. What TAB supervisors often find are TAB specifications that:
* Are not project-specific
* Request non-TAB work or services
* Include irrelevant testing requirements.
Producing project-specific TAB specifications helps the TAB firm identify the true scope of the work. Often specifications detail requirements for equipment or systems not included in the project. For example, specifications might list hydronic data where no pumps exist. Also, ambiguous scope of work statements such as “calibrate controls,” “participate in commissioning,” or “perform opposite season testing” can result in inconsistent TAB pricing. Fear of the unknown will cause TAB firms to increase their estimate.
Most of today’s model specifications are editable. Using this capability to match the TAB specification with the project characteristics will significantly improve the final TAB product and promote competitive pricing.
Download a PDF example of TAB specifications .
TAB specifications work best when they cover the work that most TAB contractors routinely perform. Some TAB specifications assign tasks to the TAB provider that are best performed by other members of the construction team. Tasks might include calling for the TAB contractor to provide equipment start-up, motor or sheave replacement, or record refrigeration pressures.
Most TAB contractors do not have the proper licensing or equipment to access HVAC refrigeration systems. Assigning these items to mechanical service technicians is more appropriate. Also, avoid giving the TAB firm sole responsibility for control calibration. A better approach is to have it coordinated, and describe the calibration requirements in the control and TAB specifications.
Download a PDF example of a pre-TAB checklist .
One common specification requires measuring wet and dry bulb every two hours for two consecutive eight-hour days, in every occupied zone. This requirement is of little value because it provides data that are only slightly useful. The same specification, in its unedited state, also requires IAQ measurements that should be provided by an industrial hygienist.
It is a given that all design professionals want their designs to work correctly. Savvy designers know a TAB report provides tangible evidence that systems are performing as intended. Rather than load the TAB specification with unrealistic tasks, designers should consider specifying systems commissioning for a project. Commissioning promotes HVAC systems that are designed, installed, started, and balanced correctly.
Out-of-date or unrealistic TAB specifications cause confusion, frustration, and erratic TAB pricing. Avoiding the disconnects outlined in this article will yield better results. Moreover, if it is time to update your TAB specification, consider having a qualified commissioning supervisor include this service in the next project.
Case Study Database
Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Plant Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.
These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.
Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.
2012 Salary Survey
In a year when manufacturing continued to lead the economic rebound, it makes sense that plant manager bonuses rebounded. Plant Engineering’s annual Salary Survey shows both wages and bonuses rose in 2012 after a retreat the year before.
Average salary across all job titles for plant floor management rose 3.5% to $95,446, and bonus compensation jumped to $15,162, a 4.2% increase from the 2010 level and double the 2011 total, which showed a sharp drop in bonus.