Back to Basics: Finding, measuring the right product attributes

Tutorial: What characteristics of a product are most important, and how do you measure them? A recent Ask Control Engineering blog question dealt with finding a sensor that would be able to tell if the liquid flowing through a pipe was water or orange juice. This question brought up the larger issue of defining product attributes and finding an appropriate approach for measuring them. What kind of sensors should you use?

12/20/2010


A recent Ask Control Engineering blog question dealt with finding a sensor that would be able to tell if the liquid flowing through a pipe was water or orange juice. This question brought up the larger issue of defining product attributes and finding an appropriate approach for measuring them.

This case is relatively simple. It isn’t hard to tell the difference between orange juice and water. If you think about it, there are several obviously different characteristics that can be measured:

  • Color and opacity (using simple machine vision);
  • Acidity (using pH or conductivity);
  • Sugar content (using specific gravity); and
  • Thickness (using viscosity).

If you think long enough, there are probably others you could come up with. The question is to identify with the one of those that is the most positive and easiest to measure. In this particular case the suggested answer was conductivity.

Some applications like this one are fairly straightforward. Others are more subtle and harder to analyze. The issue has gained relevance in process industries over the last few years as manufacturers have had to deal with a growing level of variability in feedstocks. This was a discussion point in the article, Solving Process Instability (Control Engineering, June/July 2010). More companies are finding that their traditional supplies of raw materials and fuels may no longer be available or have become too expensive. The material that is substituted may not be the same, and that can cause instability in a process or change the characteristics of the final product.

The first challenge to solving the problem is to figure out exactly how the product is different. What attribute has changed? What is different about the chemical feedstock from Source B when compared to Source A? Or, how has your longstanding supplier changed its process?

Returning to our orange juice producer, let’s say the company normally buys concentrate from Florida, but, for whatever reason, decides to start buying from California. The resulting juice is a little different, and you have to determine what that difference is. Is it a slight change in acidity? More or less fructose? If you have to compensate for the change, even a very subtle change, you have to find a way to identify and quantify it, and that means finding the right kind of measuring device.

Your initial effort to identify the difference or differences may require the help of lab, but once you know what you have to look for, the choice of a sensor on a production level may be yours. Depending on the specificity of the attribute, there may be more than one option. To complicate things further, more than one attribute may be in play. Getting orange juice concentrate from Brazil may add another to the list. Imagine the number of factors that might be in play when evaluating a product as complex as crude oil.

This specificity of matching sensor and attribute is one of the reasons that there are occasional product contamination scandals. If you have no reason to expect that cyanide has been mixed into your orange juice outside of deliberate and malicious tampering, you probably aren’t going to look for it. Performing broad spectrum analysis to look for every conceivable contaminant is not practical on a day-to-day basis with every product. Unless the cyanide is capable of changing one of the other attributes, you may not realize it’s there. This has been the reason behind some recent incidents in the pharmaceutical industry. We’ll assume that the affected companies expanded their ongoing product testing procedures.

However complicated the situation is, it eventually comes back to basic analysis.

- Peter Welander, is content manager for Control Engineering. Reach him at pwelander(at)cfemedia.



No comments
The Top Plant program honors outstanding manufacturing facilities in North America. View the 2013 Top Plant.
The Product of the Year program recognizes products newly released in the manufacturing industries.
The Leaders Under 40 program features outstanding young people who are making a difference in manufacturing. View the 2013 Leaders here.
The new control room: It's got all the bells and whistles - and alarms, too; Remote maintenance; Specifying VFDs
2014 forecast issue: To serve and to manufacture - Veterans will bring skill and discipline to the plant floor if we can find a way to get them there.
2013 Top Plant: Lincoln Electric Company, Cleveland, Ohio
Case Study Database

Case Study Database

Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Plant Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.

These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.

Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.

Bring focus to PLC programming: 5 things to avoid in putting your system together; Managing the DCS upgrade; PLM upgrade: a step-by-step approach
Balancing the bagging triangle; PID tuning improves process efficiency; Standardizing control room HMIs
Commissioning electrical systems in mission critical facilities; Anticipating the Smart Grid; Mitigating arc flash hazards in medium-voltage switchgear; Comparing generator sizing software

Annual Salary Survey

Participate in the 2013 Salary Survey

In a year when manufacturing continued to lead the economic rebound, it makes sense that plant manager bonuses rebounded. Plant Engineering’s annual Salary Survey shows both wages and bonuses rose in 2012 after a retreat the year before.

Average salary across all job titles for plant floor management rose 3.5% to $95,446, and bonus compensation jumped to $15,162, a 4.2% increase from the 2010 level and double the 2011 total, which showed a sharp drop in bonus.

2012 Salary Survey Analysis

2012 Salary Survey Results

Maintenance and reliability tips and best practices from the maintenance and reliability coaches at Allied Reliability Group.
The One Voice for Manufacturing blog reports on federal public policy issues impacting the manufacturing sector. One Voice is a joint effort by the National Tooling and Machining...
The Society for Maintenance and Reliability Professionals an organization devoted...
Join this ongoing discussion of machine guarding topics, including solutions assessments, regulatory compliance, gap analysis...
IMS Research, recently acquired by IHS Inc., is a leading independent supplier of market research and consultancy to the global electronics industry.
Maintenance is not optional in manufacturing. It’s a profit center, driving productivity and uptime while reducing overall repair costs.
The Lachance on CMMS blog is about current maintenance topics. Blogger Paul Lachance is president and chief technology officer for Smartware Group.