Asset reliability drives Lean maintenance
Lean maintenance is the application of Lean philosophies, methods, tools and techniques to maintenance functions.
Lean maintenance is the application of Lean philosophies, methods, tools and techniques to maintenance functions. It has the same fundamental goals: eliminating wastes associated with labor, inventory, procedures and techniques, resulting in improved productivity and reduced costs.
Lean maintenance is not simply a “slash-and-dash” approach in eliminating jobs and cutting costs. This common approach of slash-and-dash doesn’t eliminate waste or cut costs. Lean maintenance philosophy reduces costs by eliminating wastes that can be defined as “anything that doesn’t add value to the product, process or service.”
Many of the tools used to implement Lean principles for manufacturing also apply to maintenance. They include: 5S, Kaizen, Just-in-Time, elimination of the seven deadly wastes, and so on. However, although this article does not discuss these Lean tools, it does emphasize using a CMMS or EAM as a tool to aid in accomplishing Lean maintenance goals.
Lean maintenance principles
Much has been written about Lean manufacturing principles. Many of them are directly applicable to Lean maintenance, which include:
Work flow %%MDASSML%% One of the common performance metrics is planned vs. unplanned work orders. The benchmark goal has been 90% planned (PM and other planned activities) and 10% unplanned corrective/breakdown maintenance. In reality, with most organizations, the ratio is anywhere from 10% - 30% planned maintenance to 70% - 90% unplanned. This is indicative of operating in a reactive mode, which contributes to waste, reduced equipment life and lost productivity.
A thorough understanding and analysis of maintenance work process flow makes it easier to identify and eliminate waste. The goal is not only to eliminate waste, but to develop an improved work process flow that is more effective and productive. As the flow is thoroughly reviewed and analyzed, the entire process flow becomes visible. Wasteful activities such as delays and unnecessary travel are easily identified (Fig. 1).
A typical maintenance work process flow can point out wasteful activities, which include:
Overproduction %%MDASSML%% In the maintenance environment, overproduction is doing any work that does not add value. Performing preventive and predictive maintenance tasks more often than is necessary and redoing jobs that were not done correctly the first time are examples
Waiting %%MDASSML%% Areas of wastes in this category include maintenance personnel waiting for equipment availability, job assignments, tools, parts, instructions, other crafts, permit approval, etc. Waiting is not a value-added activity and should be eliminated or reduced as much as possible
Transportation %%MDASSML%% Unnecessary travel is the result of ineffective planning and scheduling. Examples include traveling to the maintenance shop to get technical information (O/M manual, prints, etc.) and traveling to the storeroom for parts and tools. Although not always visible, poorly-designed PM routes also contribute significantly to waste
Process waste %%MDASSML%% When performing a breakdown repair, maintenance personnel are typically under tremendous pressure to fix the machine as soon as possible and return it to production. They are not given enough time to fix it properly. This results in poor repairs and recurring problems. Properly performed repairs would eliminate this process waste and save lost production time in the long term. Many organizations use CMMS or EAM systems. Processing wastes also occur when inefficiencies exist in these systems. Examples are poorly designed applications that require multiple entries of the same data, or material requisitioning processes that require redundant approvals
Defects %%MDASSML%% In maintenance, a defect can be defined as leaving an asset in an unreliable condition. Causes of defects in the maintenance environment are numerous. Defects due to poor workmanship arise from inadequate training, inadequate/outdated procedures and not having proper tools to do the job. Equipment/asset reliability can minimize defects. Machines that are reliable produce products that are within specification, less scrap and eliminate the cause of defect correction. Equipment must be ready to run when demand is presented
Root cause %%MDASSML%% Although breakdowns and failures are never planned, they still cause the loss of production and money. Finding the root cause of a failure provides an organization with a solvable problem. Once the root cause is identified, a fix can be developed and implemented, which %%MDASSML%% if properly documented %%MDASSML%% can prevent a recurring failure situation
Parts inventory %%MDASSML%% Examples of wastes in spare parts inventory management are obsolete inventory, excessive inventory and inadequate PM programs. Most storerooms contain a significant amount of obsolete inventory, which ties up capital and consumes management resources. It can easily amount to 10% to 20% of annual inventory dollars. Excessive inventory is not obsolete, but it is inventory maintained at unnecessarily high levels, also tying up capital and consuming management resources. Inadequate PM programs cause equipment failures, which in turn result in additional parts requirements (consuming working capital) and downtime.
Number of and type of labor resources (how many plumbers, carpenters, etc.)
Time estimates, so required manpower can be determined
Detailed job steps, including permit/safety requirements
Parts and tools requirements (pre-kit if necessary)
Clear job instructions, drawings, sketches, etc.
Job site walk down to determine the most efficient way of doing the job
Equipment availability coordination
Outside contractor requirements (if any).
CMMS/EAM enables the use of Lean principles by refining PM activities. For example, it allows users to define assets by size, type, subtype and location, as well as to customize PM to a specific asset. This way users can control and optimize PM frequencies for specific types of equipment. The ability of the CMMS/EAM to track and manage work requests, labor, planning and scheduling allows users to streamline the work process flow to cut wastes and improve productivity
With easy access to detailed asset information, maintenance planners are better equipped to schedule tasks, plan routes and estimate the materials required. For example, multiple assets that share similar requirements or are at the same location may be combined in a single work order, cutting maintenance labor costs
A CMMS/EAM can produce reports indicating overdue PM tasks. Performing PMs on time can contribute to higher equipment uptime resulting in higher overall productivity
A critical aspect of maintenance planning is the availability of real-time data. A CMMS/EAM can use the real-time information through mobile technology to allow usage-based scheduling of maintenance tasks as opposed to a fixed calendar base. For example, an air-handler PM might be scheduled on runtime hours instead of at monthly intervals
Real-time information allows users to set alarms based on condition monitoring. For example, if a temperature reading is outside of predefined range, the CMMS/EAM system can issue a work order automatically.
Asset reliability can drive Lean maintenance concepts. Maintenance can help eliminate a number of different causes of waste by maintaining assets to do what they are expected to do and when they are expected to do it. Done right, Lean concepts can lower maintenance cost and increase productivity.
<table ID = 'id2663119-0-table' CELLSPACING = '0' CELLPADDING = '2' WIDTH = '100%' BORDER = '0'><tbody ID = 'id2663639-0-tbody'><tr ID = 'id2663641-0-tr'><td ID = 'id2663643-0-td' CLASS = 'table' STYLE = 'background-color: #EEEEEE'> Author Information </td></tr><tr ID = 'id2663653-3-tr'><td ID = 'id2663655-3-td' CLASS = 'table'> Kris Bagadia is president of PEAK Industrial Solutions LLC, in Brookfield, WI. A consultant and educator, he has been active within the maintenance field for more than 20 years. He can be reached at (262) 783-6260 or at firstname.lastname@example.org </td></tr></tbody></table>
Delays must be avoided at all cost. Weekly scheduling must be done with daily fine-tuning as necessary. This level of detail and coordination is required to achieve a Lean and efficient maintenance operation (Fig. 2).
CMMS/EAM as a Lean tool
The CMMS/EAM can be looked upon as a tool that can help implement and support Lean maintenance in many different ways, which include:
A CMMS/EAM can monitor and control parts inventory. It keeps track of inventory items, vendor performance, parts receipts, issues and returns. In addition, CMMS/EAM can automate the parts purchasing process. Vendor-managed and stocked inventory can also drastically reduce parts quantity (stocked in the storeroom) and save money.
Condition monitoring usually involves the use of installed devices (gauges, meters, etc.) to monitor the operating conditions of equipment and other assets. An example is a pressure gauge on a chiller. Maintenance can establish operating limits for the conditions being monitored and trend the observed data.
If the observed data is outside of certain predefined range of values, some maintenance action may be required. This is referred to as condition-based maintenance and can be very effective and less expensive than periodic or fixed-frequency maintenance.
The planner/scheduler role is very important in a Lean maintenance environment. The goal is to optimize the use of available resources. Detailed job plans should be developed for all approved open work orders including:
Annual Salary Survey
After almost a decade of uncertainty, the confidence of plant floor managers is soaring. Even with a number of challenges and while implementing new technologies, there is a renewed sense of optimism among plant managers about their business and their future.
The respondents to the 2014 Plant Engineering Salary Survey come from throughout the U.S. and serve a variety of industries, but they are uniform in their optimism about manufacturing. This year’s survey found 79% consider manufacturing a secure career. That’s up from 75% in 2013 and significantly higher than the 63% figure when Plant Engineering first started asking that question a decade ago.