Active filter cleaning technologies extend filter life, improve efficiency
Indoor air quality: Active filter cleaning has evolved from passive filtration to more active methods like mechanical and reverse air methods
Early dust collection systems used passive filtration to separate dust from various airstreams. Filters inside a collector gradually loaded with dust and, over time, the pressure drop across the filter media increased until there was so much resistance the airflow through the system dropped below an acceptable level. The filter media then had to be removed, disposed of, and clean filter media installed in order to return the system to the original operating airflow conditions. Clean filters return a system to a lower pressure drop condition.
A key improvement in dust collection occurred when active cleaning was developed to recondition filter media that stayed in the collector. Over the years, various methods of active cleaning were applied to dust collectors, including both mechanical and reverse air methods. Each method provided filter cleaning with varying degrees of success. The objective in each method was to remove any built-up “dust cake” from the surface of the filter, thereby reducing the pressure drop across the filters and extending filter life, in effect extending the time between actual filter media changes.
Mechanical cleaning was introduced to the industry early as a low-technology form of active cleaning. Mechanical cleaning involved shaking or shocking filters to dislodge the built-up dust cake. This cleaning method allowed a portion of the built up dust to be removed periodically to extend filter life. Mechanical cleaning systems (See Figures 1 and 2) could be manual (i.e., a hand lever or foot lever to shake or bend the filters) or automated (motor-driven device to shake or vibrate the filters).
This was an improvement over passive cleaning but was still limited in effectiveness because it required the airflow through the system be shut off prior to cleaning. This pattern of shutting down the collector categorized it as an intermittent duty cleaning system; cleaning only occurred when the dust collector was shut off and all filters were cleaned at the same time. The airflow in the system would therefore show a pattern as pressure drop decreased after cleaning (airflow increased), then over time the pressure drop would climb again (airflow decreased). Overall, the performance of the cleaning system was very dependent on how often the collector could be shut down.
Reverse air cleaning
Reverse air cleaning introduced an airflow in the opposite direction of the filtered air (See Figure 3). The reverse airflow would penetrate the filter media from the clean filter side and knock the dust cake off the outer surface of the filter. Multiple methods were used to accomplish the reverse flow, including both fans and compressed air.
Low- to medium-pressure reverse air cleaning systems typically used a continuously running fan blowing a large volume of low-pressure air in the opposite direction of the filtered airstream (See Figure 4). The reversed airflow blew the dust cake off of the surface of the filter media during the cleaning process.
Typically, the reverse air fan was run continuously with only a few filters being cleaned at any given time. This method of cleaning produced what was considered a continuous duty system because the dust collector did not have to be shut down during the actual filter media cleaning process.
Pulse jet cleaning
The more common form of reverse air cleaning used in many collectors today is called pulse jet. This cleaning technique uses a stream of reverse air “pulsed” in the opposite direction of the filtered airstream. The pulse of cleaning air tends to expand the filter media, mechanically disturbing the dust cake on the filter and then blowing it from the filter.
The pulse air pressure can range from medium (generally less than 15 psig) to high (60-90 psig) depending on the specific cleaning system design (See Figures 5 and 6). Pulse jet cleaning is very effective at cleaning filter media and is also considered a continuous duty system.
Continuous duty, or “on-line” cleaning, provides an advantage by not disrupting the primary airflow during cleaning, allowing the dust collector to operate during the actual cleaning cycle. Only a few filters are cleaned at any given time, though the system will eventually clean all the filters.
Some cleaning systems will run 100% of the time, like the low-pressure reverse air systems. Others are dependent on the observed filter condition (pressure drop) and will not initiate cleaning until the pressure drop reaches a specific high setpoint. Over time, as dust loading increases on the filter media, the pressure drop-dependent cleaning systems may start to run more constant cleaning cycles due to the heavier dust loads or the filters reaching the end of their effective life.
Pulse jet cleaning has been refined for years in order to optimize the effectiveness of the cleaning system. Initially, a pulse of compressed air was just aimed at the filters, and the higher force of the compressed air increased the level of cleaning compared to a fan because a larger burst of energy pushed more dust off the filter media.
This process was improved again by the addition of a blow pipe (nozzle) or jet tube in the clean air plenum of the dust collector. The blow pipe was used to help concentrate or manage the pulse energy to direct it towards the filter.
Another improvement was the addition of a venturi in the clean air plenum (See Figure 7). The venturi affected how the compressed air flowed into the clean side of the collector, how air followed the pulse of cleaning air, and how the cleaning air passed into the clean side of the actual filter. The venturi directed the flow of compressed air into the filter and optimized the cleaning power.
Advanced pulse energy cleaning
Advanced pulse energy shaping represents the next advancement of pulse cleaning, first introduced with the addition of a compact, efficiently designed filter pack which allowed refinement of the pulse cleaning system. It results in a filter that handles heavy loading and recovers efficiently from system upsets.
One way this was accomplished was through a pulse accumulator that shaped the compressed air and optimized the pulse energy contacting the filter pack without restricting airflow or wasting energy (See Figure 8). Another technique is to control and optimize the direction of compressed air into the filter media using a zero-turn pulse design. The pulse flows with maximum cleaning energy in straight-line paths through the media (See Figure 9) allowing the dust to easily pulse out of the fluted channels.
The transition from passive filtration to active cleaning in the dust collection industry has produced a variety of cleaning systems used in dust collectors. On-line cleaning, pulse jet technology, and new filter designs have all led to improved cleaning systems. Filter cleaning optimization maximizes the life of the filter media while minimizing the amount of energy needed to achieve the best possible cleaning cycle—a win-win for dust collector owners and operators.
Karen Wear is a Torit product manager at Donaldson Company, Inc. (Karen.Wear(at)Donaldson.com).
Case Study Database
Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Plant Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.
These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.
Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.
Annual Salary Survey
In a year when manufacturing continued to lead the economic rebound, it makes sense that plant manager bonuses rebounded. Plant Engineering’s annual Salary Survey shows both wages and bonuses rose in 2012 after a retreat the year before.
Average salary across all job titles for plant floor management rose 3.5% to $95,446, and bonus compensation jumped to $15,162, a 4.2% increase from the 2010 level and double the 2011 total, which showed a sharp drop in bonus.