2010 SUMMIT: How manufacturing can become more energy efficient

Manufacturers should consider energy as a cost component of manufacturing production, measure where and how energy is used, and create an implementation plan for using energy more efficiently.

03/31/2010


Consider energy as a cost component of manufacturing production, measure when, where and how it's used, and create an implementation plan for using energy more efficiently. Speaking at the Manufacturing / Automation Summit, March 28-30, 2010, hosted by Control Engineering and Plant Engineering magazines, a session with energy management experts advised about energy use and sustainability for manufacturers on March 29.
Offering advice on these topics were Rene Wolf, general manager, factory automation, Siemens; Carl Castellow, PE, industrial energy efficiency manager, Schneider Electric; Rod Ellsworth, vice president for global asset sustainability, Infor; and Marc Leroux, marketing manager for ABB's collaborative production.
Identify, evaluate, realize
Wolf advised:
- Key drivers behind industry's push toward energy efficiency are rising energy costs, corporate social responsibility, government regulations, and electrical reliability;
- Obstacles industry faced in its drive toward greater energy efficiency: incorrect perception of low return on investment (ROI; many don't understand that payback time can be quick), low costs versus low lifecycle costs (some don't always do calculations to see that higher initial cost is more than offset by energy savings), lack of measurement culture around energy consuming equipment, and side benefits (such as reliability, less downtime) are not considered;
- To understand this, companies need a comprehensive approach, where those involved identify, evaluate, and realize. (Identify energy flows to uncover hidden energy potential; evaluate potential savings by considering life cycle costs of investments; and realize efficiency gains to optimize equipment and processes).
Look at energy assets, create a plan
Castellow recommended:
- Consider energy assets. Manufacturers that make steam as part of their processes should consider that as an energy asset that might be sold back to the local utility;
- An energy action plan should buy a seat at the table for any major decision-making. The plan should be built into production and company-wide thinking, way beyond an energy audit, which so often sits on a shelf; and
- Integrate supply and demand, take a long-term approach, and use experiences to consider various options.
Mitigate cash, waste, risk
Ellsworth suggested:
- Because energy can be the largest cost of production for many manufacturers, best practices should be used to bring energy savings into plants to mitigate cash, waste, and risk;
- To better factor in energy and environmental impact, enable the ability to make the changes, aggregate the necessary resources, create visibility (more than 20% energy savings can be realized just by monitoring), use optimization and intelligence tools; and consider collaborative innovation; and
- Because energy efficiency requires integration of behavioral changes, continuous energy commissioning needs to become part of ongoing processes, related to all assets.
Measure and control energy use
Leroux said:
- To implement an energy management strategy, consider requirements, needs, and contracts related to external grid; local network and cogeneration possibilities; manufacturing operations; process automation; and hardware. Applying variable speed drives (VSDs), for instance, can save about 30% in related energy costs.
- Shed load as needed (one spike over a pre-determined peak can result in higher monthly charge for all electricity that month with some utilities), optimize processes, and look at energy optimization; and
- Assign costs to various production centers based on cost of operations according to time and processes, so real-time energy costs can be factored into cost of production.

 





No comments
The Top Plant program honors outstanding manufacturing facilities in North America. View the 2013 Top Plant.
The Product of the Year program recognizes products newly released in the manufacturing industries.
The Leaders Under 40 program features outstanding young people who are making a difference in manufacturing. View the 2013 Leaders here.
The new control room: It's got all the bells and whistles - and alarms, too; Remote maintenance; Specifying VFDs
2014 forecast issue: To serve and to manufacture - Veterans will bring skill and discipline to the plant floor if we can find a way to get them there.
2013 Top Plant: Lincoln Electric Company, Cleveland, Ohio
Case Study Database

Case Study Database

Get more exposure for your case study by uploading it to the Plant Engineering case study database, where end-users can identify relevant solutions and explore what the experts are doing to effectively implement a variety of technology and productivity related projects.

These case studies provide examples of how knowledgeable solution providers have used technology, processes and people to create effective and successful implementations in real-world situations. Case studies can be completed by filling out a simple online form where you can outline the project title, abstract, and full story in 1500 words or less; upload photos, videos and a logo.

Click here to visit the Case Study Database and upload your case study.

Bring focus to PLC programming: 5 things to avoid in putting your system together; Managing the DCS upgrade; PLM upgrade: a step-by-step approach
Balancing the bagging triangle; PID tuning improves process efficiency; Standardizing control room HMIs
Commissioning electrical systems in mission critical facilities; Anticipating the Smart Grid; Mitigating arc flash hazards in medium-voltage switchgear; Comparing generator sizing software

Annual Salary Survey

Participate in the 2013 Salary Survey

In a year when manufacturing continued to lead the economic rebound, it makes sense that plant manager bonuses rebounded. Plant Engineering’s annual Salary Survey shows both wages and bonuses rose in 2012 after a retreat the year before.

Average salary across all job titles for plant floor management rose 3.5% to $95,446, and bonus compensation jumped to $15,162, a 4.2% increase from the 2010 level and double the 2011 total, which showed a sharp drop in bonus.

2012 Salary Survey Analysis

2012 Salary Survey Results

Maintenance and reliability tips and best practices from the maintenance and reliability coaches at Allied Reliability Group.
The One Voice for Manufacturing blog reports on federal public policy issues impacting the manufacturing sector. One Voice is a joint effort by the National Tooling and Machining...
The Society for Maintenance and Reliability Professionals an organization devoted...
Join this ongoing discussion of machine guarding topics, including solutions assessments, regulatory compliance, gap analysis...
IMS Research, recently acquired by IHS Inc., is a leading independent supplier of market research and consultancy to the global electronics industry.
Maintenance is not optional in manufacturing. It’s a profit center, driving productivity and uptime while reducing overall repair costs.
The Lachance on CMMS blog is about current maintenance topics. Blogger Paul Lachance is president and chief technology officer for Smartware Group.