2008 ARC Awards entry rules


Please find an

official entry form here

. All information on the entry form must be completed. An entry fee payment of $200 must accompany each entry, in addition to the supporting materials listed below. Official rules are listed below. Please follow these rules carefully. In fairness to all entrants, exceptions will not be permitted. Completed entries are due Aug. 29, 2008.


  1. Entry form: All entries must be submitted online using an official entry form. All information requested on the entry form must be provided, unless not applicable, in which case, write N/A. An incomplete form or a form providing misleading or false information will result in disqualification.

  2. Eligibility: Entries must meet all of the following criteria:

    1. Projects must have been completed with a statement of occupancy between Aug. 1, 2007, and July 31, 2008.

    2. An authorized representative of the engineering firm in charge of the building project must check the entry form verifying the building project’s occupancy date and the accuracy of the information provided.

    3. Entries must be submitted by or on behalf of the building project engineer or engineering firm.

    4. Building projects must be of appropriate project types: commercial, institutional, or industrial.

  3. Categories: The ARC Awards program recognizes firms and engineers winning or placing in two categories: Most Innovative New Construction Project and Most Innovative Rehab/Reconstruction Project. Gold, silver, and bronze awards will be given in each category.

  4. Project types: Project types do not have to be identified, but projects that will be considered are commercial, institutional, and industrial.

  5. Supporting materials: To be complete, each entry must contain the $200 entry fee, the online entry form, 2 printed copies of all color photos and other illustrations, CD of all color photos, and 2 copies of the project description. Entry fee, entry forms, photos, illustrations, CD, and project descriptions must be submitted as a single package. Materials submitted separately from the entry form will not be accepted. Entry fee, submitted photos, and other materials will not be returned.

  6. Photos or other illustrations: Each entry must include a CD containing high-resolution (300 DPI in TIFF, JPG or EPS) photos for magazine reproduction. All photos or other illustrations must be in color prints, if applicable. All photos or other illustrations must be printed 2 times each. Photos must include:

    1. Building’s exterior and interior

    2. Building’s M/E/P systems, HVAC systems, fire/life-safety systems, electrical systems, and other specifically engineered systems

    3. Drawings, illustrations, diagrams, spreadsheets, supporting documents, project schedules, etc.

    4. Each photo must be accompanied with a 50-word caption.

  7. Project description: Submit two project descriptions with the application. The entire (see below) project description should not exceed 2,500 words. Please describe the uniqueness of the design, results in energy efficiency, system integration, and inventive solutions to various project challenges with regard to the following, which should each be 250 words:

    1. Project as a whole

    2. Building controls and automation

    3. Electrical distribution

    4. Fire protection

    5. HVAC

    6. Lighting

    7. Motors and Drives

    8. Plumbing

    9. Power and power systems

  8. Entry deadline : Entries must reach Consulting-Specifying Engineer editorial offices by Aug. 29, 2008. Mail completed entries to Amara Rozgus, ARC Awards, Consulting-Specifying Engineer, 2000 Clearwater Dr., Oak Brook, IL, 60523. In fairness to those entrants who make efforts to meet this deadline, it cannot be extended.

  9. Judging : All judging will be supervised and coordinated by members of the Consulting-Specifying Engineer magazine editorial staff. Their decisions are final. The judging panel will consist of members of the editorial advisory board, other engineers, industry experts, and CSE staff. Entries will be judged on the design of the buildings systems and other defining criteria that includes:

    1. The uniqueness of the building system

    2. State-of-the-art technologies

    3. Sustainability: energy efficiency, IAQ, water conservation, and comfort

    4. System and interdisciplinary integration and interaction

    5. Innovative solutions to various project challenges

    6. Challenges posted by architecture

Entrants may go online at www.csemag.com/arcawards and view the complete judging point system.

  1. Awards: Gold, silver, and bronze awards will be given in two categories: Most Innovative New Construction Project and Most Innovative Rehab/Reconstruction Project. Willing projects will be featured in Consulting-Specifying Engineer’s December 2008 issue and on the magazine’s Web site. Engineers and/or firms that submit winning projects will receive a plaque that is suitable for display in office headquarters, along with a congratulatory letter from the magazine’s chief editor. The letter may be used for issuing national press releases, posting on the winning project’s corporate Web site, and accompanying project RFQs.

  2. Entry fee: There is a $200 entry fee. Checks must be payable to Consulting-Specifying Engineer. Cash or purchase orders will not be accepted. The entry fee must accompany the supporting materials. Entry fees will not be refunded.

  3. Disqualification: Any entry that in the opinion of the judges or administrators that does not meet the letter or the spirit of this contest may be disqualified. The following specifically will be grounds for disqualification: Entries that do not comply with official rules, entries that are incomplete, entries with statement of occupancies outside of Aug. 1, 2007 and July 31, 2008, and entries that contain false information.

No comments
The Top Plant program honors outstanding manufacturing facilities in North America. View the 2013 Top Plant.
The Product of the Year program recognizes products newly released in the manufacturing industries.
The Engineering Leaders Under 40 program identifies and gives recognition to young engineers who...
A cool solution: Collaboration, chemistry leads to foundry coat product development; See the 2015 Product of the Year Finalists
Raising the standard: What's new with NFPA 70E; A global view of manufacturing; Maintenance data; Fit bearings properly
Sister act: Building on their father's legacy, a new generation moves Bales Metal Surface Solutions forward; Meet the 2015 Engineering Leaders Under 40
Cyber security cost-efficient for industrial control systems; Extracting full value from operational data; Managing cyber security risks
Drilling for Big Data: Managing the flow of information; Big data drilldown series: Challenge and opportunity; OT to IT: Creating a circle of improvement; Industry loses best workers, again
Pipeline vulnerabilities? Securing hydrocarbon transit; Predictive analytics hit the mainstream; Dirty pipelines decrease flow, production—pig your line; Ensuring pipeline physical and cyber security
Upgrading secondary control systems; Keeping enclosures conditioned; Diagnostics increase equipment uptime; Mechatronics simplifies machine design
Designing positive-energy buildings; Ensuring power quality; Complying with NFPA 110; Minimizing arc flash hazards
Building high availability into industrial computers; Of key metrics and myth busting; The truth about five common VFD myths

Annual Salary Survey

After almost a decade of uncertainty, the confidence of plant floor managers is soaring. Even with a number of challenges and while implementing new technologies, there is a renewed sense of optimism among plant managers about their business and their future.

The respondents to the 2014 Plant Engineering Salary Survey come from throughout the U.S. and serve a variety of industries, but they are uniform in their optimism about manufacturing. This year’s survey found 79% consider manufacturing a secure career. That’s up from 75% in 2013 and significantly higher than the 63% figure when Plant Engineering first started asking that question a decade ago.

Read more: 2014 Salary Survey: Confidence rises amid the challenges

Maintenance and reliability tips and best practices from the maintenance and reliability coaches at Allied Reliability Group.
The One Voice for Manufacturing blog reports on federal public policy issues impacting the manufacturing sector. One Voice is a joint effort by the National Tooling and Machining...
The Society for Maintenance and Reliability Professionals an organization devoted...
Join this ongoing discussion of machine guarding topics, including solutions assessments, regulatory compliance, gap analysis...
IMS Research, recently acquired by IHS Inc., is a leading independent supplier of market research and consultancy to the global electronics industry.
Maintenance is not optional in manufacturing. It’s a profit center, driving productivity and uptime while reducing overall repair costs.
The Lachance on CMMS blog is about current maintenance topics. Blogger Paul Lachance is president and chief technology officer for Smartware Group.